I believe being a Liberal means I accept another's existence unless they threaten me and mine--I have guns. Brusque and curt, that's it.
I support LGBTQ+ and people of all races even though I'm an old white straight married man. I'm 72. Never in my seven decades has a gay person or a trans person or a non white person ever ever come to me and hassled me for being who I am. I don't respect people who look like me and go up to "others" and hassle them.
In this new era tainted by orange mist, I will continue to advocate strongly for equal rights under the law for all. Such a 14A leitmotiv might appear in some of my posts. Back in the day that angered a few folks. Sometimes it'll be that way.
Here are quotes and the link to the article that prompted this post.
https://truthout.org/articles/idaho-rep ... -decision/Republican lawmakers in the Idaho state legislature have authored a resolution demanding that the U.S. Supreme Court overturn its 2015 decision recognizing marriage equality throughout the country.
House Joint Memorial 1 was introduced last week by the House State Affairs Committee. Although it is a nonbinding resolution, the legislation would make a formal declaration by the Idaho House of Representatives, calling for the Supreme Court to allow states once again to determine whether same-sex marriages should be recognized within their jurisdictions.
The resolution makes the false assertion that the court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges “causes collateral damage” to other constitutional rights, “including religious liberty” — a common refrain of right-wingers who believe their conservative beliefs should outweigh the personal freedoms of others.
“The Idaho Legislature rejects the Obergefell decision … [and] calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell and restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman,” the resolution states, citing errant and outdated beliefs regarding what constitutes a “natural” union.
This is how they are going to "show harm" that people being who they are can be made illegal. I reject their premise. >ptui< The article is in-depth and links out to important cases and rulings.
CDF