'Serious constitutional concerns': Dems back GOP bill that could trigger 'diplomatic crises'

1
All but nine Senate Democrats recently joined all Senate Republicans to push a new immigration bill forward for further debate. Should it pass, experts are warning that it could cause a major blow to international diplomacy.

In a Friday essay for Slate, legal analyst Mark Joseph Stern argued that the Laken Riley Act — which the House of Representatives has already passed — goes much further than its stated goal of allowing the government to detain undocumented immigrants accused of crimes. Stern called that a "gross mischaracterization" of the bill, and asserted that the "sweeping changes" in the legislation would create "serious constitutional concerns."

"It would penalize immigrants who live and work in the U.S. legally, subjecting them to indefinite detention without being convicted or even charged with a crime. And it would transfer a massive amount of power to state attorneys general and district court judges, who could effectively wrest control over immigration enforcement from the executive branch," Stern wrote. "These judges could, upon a state’s request, ban the issuance of allvisas to residents of entire countries like India."

"Under the Laken Riley Act, courts could prevent every resident of these countries from obtaining a visa," he added. "That includes visas for skilled workers, students, medical treatment, business travel—all of it would be shut down, likely setting off diplomatic crises that the president would have little leeway to resolve."

And as Aaron Reichlin-Melnick recently told New Republic writer Greg Sargent, the Laken Riley Act would transfer significant power to far-right state attorneys general that previously belonged to the federal government. He pointed out that under the bill's language, a Republican attorney general could theoretically "block a Democratic president’s grant of parole to migrants fleeing the war in Ukraine."

“Imagine Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton bringing a lawsuit seeking to end all H1-B visas from India and China because those countries refuse to accept deportations of those nationals living in Texas,” Reichlin-Melnick said. “This could allow any state A.G. to threaten an international incident.”
https://www.alternet.org/dems-laken-riley-act/

Ken Paxton would have a field day, if this bill was passed into law.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: 'Serious constitutional concerns': Dems back GOP bill that could trigger 'diplomatic crises'

2
The bill passed the US House and it's likely that there will be enough Democratic votes in the US Senate to defeat any filibuster, even Schumer has come around. US media has abandoned investigating and reporting events and people, they are now in the speculation game which gets them more clicks and more revenue.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: 'Serious constitutional concerns': Dems back GOP bill that could trigger 'diplomatic crises'

3
The more money one has, the more cowardly one becomes in an effort to keep it.

In their year between 20 and 21, they should have worked up to a seven day fast at the end of the year so they could know actual hunger. But they didn't, so they don't. Luigi will teach them, which is most unfortunate. I'm pretty sure that's the only thing our system can offer, which is also most unfortunate.

CDF
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: 'Serious constitutional concerns': Dems back GOP bill that could trigger 'diplomatic crises'

4
Senate Majority Leader John Thune notched his first big win Friday by clearing the filibuster on the Laken Riley Act. It'll almost certainly pass Monday with ease. It's a specific, popular, bipartisan bill. But it also hands Thune a chance to prove he's serious about promises made during the GOP leadership election. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) told Axios: "What we can feel good about is we're having a lot more conversations about what we're doing." Scott ran against Thune for leader. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) told Axios that Thune "says what he means and means what he says when he talks about having a more open amendment process." Lee wants a more open process and backed Scott in November.

Thune spent days haggling with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer over the bill, which requires ICE to detain immigrants charged with or convicted of theft. Thune and Schumer agreed Wednesday to allow two votes on amendments. One passed, which would require ICE to detain immigrants who attack law enforcement. Senators will vote Monday on another amendment from Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) that would add to the detention list immigrants who commit crimes resulting in death or bodily injury. It's likely to pass. Because of the change, the House will have to pass the bill again before it reaches President-elect Trump's desk. Nearly a quarter of Senate Dems proved they're willing to help break a filibuster for GOP priorities.

Schumer privately told Democrats they were free to engage with the GOP on the bill, before he publicly opposed it once it was clear that substantive changes weren't happening. His defectors included new Sens. Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan [both just elected in November 2024]. Schumer also lost Georgia's Jon Ossoff, Arizona's Mark Kelly, Michigan's Gary Peters, Nevada's Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen, and New Hampshire's Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen.
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/17/thune- ... st-big-win

Trump will sign this into law with a lot of fanfare. A lot of pragmatic Democratic senators in purple states know how the winds are blowing, Jon Ossoff of GA, Gary Peters of MI and Jeanne Shaheen of NH are up for reelection in 2026. Trump won back Georgia and Michigan in 2024. Republicans have more senators up for reelection in 2026, but most are in solidly red states.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: 'Serious constitutional concerns': Dems back GOP bill that could trigger 'diplomatic crises'

5
The Senate passed the Laken Riley Act on Monday, with 12 Democrats joining all Republicans to vote for the amended immigration bill. The measure, which would mandate the detention of more undocumented immigrants charged with crimes, now goes to the House, which passed a similar but not identical bill earlier this month. The final Senate tally was 64-35. The House is expected to take up the measure later this week, likely Wednesday or Thursday. It would then land on President Donald Trump’s desk, delivering him an early if modest bipartisan win on his signature campaign issue of illegal immigration.

The Democratic senators who backed it were Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), John Fetterman (Pa.), Ruben Gallego (Ariz.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Mark Kelly (Ariz.), Jon Ossoff (Ga.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jacky Rosen (Nev.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Elissa Slotkin (Mich.), Mark Warner (Va.) and Raphael Warnock (Ga.). The Laken Riley Act, named for a 22-year-old woman killed by an undocumented immigrant in Georgia last year, makes two major changes. Currently the Department of Homeland Security has discretion to detain only undocumented immigrants accused of serious crimes, like rape, domestic violence, murder and some drug offenses.

The bill would institute a mandatory requirement to detain those charged with smaller crimes. Because Riley’s murderer had absconded on a shoplifting charge, the initial bill included burglary, minor theft and larceny. Amendments from Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Joni Ernst expanded the list to include those charged with the assault of a law enforcement officer and causing death or serious bodily injury to another person.The measure also gives the green light to state governments to sue the federal government over certain immigration decisions and “alleged failures.” State attorney generals could file lawsuits, for instance, to have specific immigrants detained or to stop the issuance of visas to immigrants from countries that won’t accept deportees. DHS has said the bill would require billions of dollars in additional funding.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2 ... e-00199518
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests