"Misinformation on Number of School Shootings Fueled by Inconsistent Reporting"

1
Different definitions of “school shooting” are contributing to misinformation about the issue. There are several efforts to track the number of school shootings in the U.S. One of them counted 346 school shootings in 2023. The other counted 37. Both have been cited in media reports – the larger one, more often – but the discrepancy is rarely explained. How could they be so different? The Violence Project, an independent operation run by data scientist David Riedman, has a “K-12 School Shooting Database.” The tracker includes any incident in which "a gun is brandished, is fired, or a bullet hits school property for any reason, regardless of the number of victims, time, or day of the week." It counted 346 incidents in 2023, and counted nine in the first 12 days of 2024.

EducationWeek (Center bias), a news organization, uses more limited criteria. It counts incidents “where a firearm was discharged, where any individual, other than the suspect or perpetrator, has a bullet wound resulting from the incident, that happen on K-12 school property or on a school bus, and that occur while school is in session or during a school-sponsored event.” This tracker counted 37 incidents in 2023. Everytown, an activist group that pushes for gun safety, has its own tracker, which includes “every time a firearm discharges a live round inside or into a school building or on or onto a school campus or grounds, as documented by the press.” As of Jan. 12, it counted one incident in 2024– the shooting at Perry High School in Iowa.

When the average person reads about the number of school shootings, they’re likely imagining a scenario closer to the one counted by EducationWeek or Everytown, in which people were injured or killed by gunfire at a school. But the K-12 Violence Project tracker is cited far more often in media reports. “Nearly 350 school shooting incidents occurred across the U.S. in 2023, data shows,” according to U.S. News and World Report (Lean Left bias). “There were 346 incidents in which a gun was brandished or fired at school or a bullet hit school property in 2023, according to the K-12 School Shooting Database. That was the highest of any year in the website's data, which goes back to 1966,” reported Reuters (Center bias).

“With a little less than two weeks remaining in the year, some 340 school shootings had been recorded as of Dec. 20 by the K-12 School Shooting Database,” reported K-12 Dive (not rated by AllSides). These reports mention the Violence Project tracker’s broad criteria, but don’t mention the other data sources. More extreme statistics get more clicks — a phenomenon known as media bias by sensationalism. In this case, using more dire numbers could also be a sign of negativity bias, in which reporters emphasize bad news — which is where the common adage “if it bleeds, it leads” comes from. Unfortunately, many modern media business models are built on this. Don’t let that prevent you from seeing the full picture. Read multiple sources and compare coverage to get a broader view and decide for yourself.
https://www.allsides.com/blog/misinform ... -reporting

That's advice the media reporters should take, read multiple sources don't use just one biased source.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Misinformation on Number of School Shootings Fueled by Inconsistent Reporting"

4
Definitely important to clarify the terms used. Someone shooting some pot shots at a sign on a high school parking lot in a rural town outside of school hours is not the same thing as an "active shooter" inside an occupied school, and those should not be lumped into the same category. It just does not make any sense.

For any kind of planned approach to achieve a desired outcome, you need accurate metrics so that you can determine if your approach is having any effect on the actual thing you are trying to modify, and you also need a way to ensure that any changes to the metric are the result of said approach and not due to random fluctuations in the data or other causes.

Re: "Misinformation on Number of School Shootings Fueled by Inconsistent Reporting"

5
I agree, definitions are very important because the doctored stats aren't often questioned by reporters or politicians.


In the political realm, Anonymously-Sourced Report Says Doug Emhoff ‘Forcefully’ Slapped Then-Girlfriend in 2012. Doug Emhoff is Kamala Harris' husband.
An October 2 report from The Daily Mail (Right bias) accused Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, of “forcefully” slapping his then-girlfriend in 2012. A spokesperson for Emhoff denied the allegations on October 3.

The Details: On October 2, the Mail reported speaking anonymously to three friends of the woman, who it says “is a successful New York attorney.” Emhoff reportedly “struck the woman in the face so hard she spun around” late at night after an event at the Cannes Film Festival in France. The Mail said the alleged victim declined to comment, and Emhoff did not respond to its request for comment. On October 3, a spokesperson for Emhoff told Semafor (Lean Left bias), “any suggestion that he would or has ever hit a woman is false.”

For Context: Last week, Emhoff was interviewed by MSNBC’s (Left bias) Jen Psaki, who said Emhoff has “reshaped the perception of masculinity” by being an “incredibly supportive spouse” to Harris. In early August, the Mail reported that Emhoff cheated on his first wife in 2008 with their babysitter and impregnated her. The Mail wrote that Emhoff “admitted” to the affair following the report.

How the Media Covered It: On October 2 and 3, the story was widely covered by the right, and some Center-rated outlets, most prominently Newsweek and NewsNation. AllSides did not initially find coverage from the left, until Semafor reported speaking to a spokesperson for Emhoff on October 3.
https://www.allsides.com/story/politics ... riend-2012
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Misinformation on Number of School Shootings Fueled by Inconsistent Reporting"

6
Alphabetic languages are designed to change. The meaning of a word is its use in the common speech. Meanings change depending on how often a certain meaning is used. It's natural. Younger people will carry their preferred meanings into their more mature years where those of us used to older meanings will be pushing up daisies.

Ideographic languages like Chinese do not change as quickly as do alphabetic languages. For example, their glyph for the sun is several thousand years unchanged. Well, that was fun.

That being said, how the press talks about "school shootings" is important. Such things must never be viewed as "normal." Such shootings are abnormal. While we're generally seeing less violence over all when compared to the past, we are seeing more high profile shootings of innocent folks. This is abnormal and is the result of conditions that were allowed to grow and metastasize. We can fix this, but we have to vote in a better Congress.

CDF
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest