Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

26
BearPaws wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 8:48 pm
--snrps--

Because such abuse of residents' civil rights happens, it's perfectly reasonable that any person encountering police--whose job is to find reasons to arrest people, after all--would take self-protective actions, including recording EVERY encounter with any cop, knowing how to not answer any questions that don't need answering, etc. Too many of my marginalized neighbors have lost their lives because cops are so bad at de-escalation.

A cop ordering me to put my phone down is afraid of being held accountable for their actions (remember the saying "If you aren't doing anything wrong, you don't have reason to worry?"). Recording encounters with cops is a First Amendment and Fourth Amendment right, in my humble opinion. If a cop is acting as a cop, they are acting as a representative of the government, and have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

That you have had what are apparently universal good outcomes with cops of various agencies is marvelous. A privilege, frankly. People close to me have not had that good fortune. I believe in the lived experiences of my neighbors.
I, too, have never had a bad encounter with cops in my city. "But our cops are good!" Well, yeah. I'm an old, tall, white guy who doesn't do things cops hate. I agree that marginal communities like homeless folks in my town get treated differently from me. And I agree that the cop who protests being filmed with a phone is automatically suspect. Yet I also agree that those cops doing bad things to marginal communities are in the severe minority. I think most cops are good cops.

But people can be hinky. It's part of the messy business of our democracy that is comprised of "people". It's important to hold the bad eggs accountable. Which is messy. All's we can do is to keep at it and view things always with clear eyes.

CDF
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

29
BearPaws wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 8:48 pm Ylatkit, I could list half a dozen YouTube channels (including the one from Beau of the Fifth Column (https://www.youtube.com/@BeauoftheFifthColumn), an independent journalist whose workaholic tendencies got him close to burnout, and his wife is doing a lot of the videos now, and one from "That Dang Dad" (https://www.youtube.com/@ThatDangDad) who used to be a cop in the Los Angeles area and is now an advocate for abolition of policing as it is now done in this country, and any number of channels by civil rights advocates like https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer, and auditors' channels "Audit the Audit" and "The Lackluster Channel") that show how cops in lots of places abuse the Constitutional rights of the people they encounter. I could list books about how police "culture" abuses people (The Riders Come Out at Night, White Robes and Broken Badges and others), and research that shows that one is statistically more likely to die at the hands of a cop than of a mass shooter (https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/ ... -bx-uIOv7o). I could point to the DOJ decisions that hold departments (including the Louisville Metro Police Department, operating where I live) as exhibiting a pattern of behavior that abuses the rights of the community residents.

My point is that such abuse of the civil rights of residents of the communities happens. It's widespread. It's a feature of the police culture. It does not happen in a vacuum--it can ONLY happen if the command structure of the department encourages--or at the very least, tolerates--such behavior. One reads numerous news reports of alleged "good" cops who try to hold the bad cops accountable for such abuses, but who rapidly learn that they will not have backup if they are in trouble, so "go along to get along." That latter point is behind the saying that "if a department has thirteen hundred 'good' cops and twelve 'bad' cops, it actually has 1312 bad cops," with the 1312 indicating letters of the alphabet (1=A, etc.), suggesting that "All Cops Are Bad."

I mentioned that "Beau" lives in a rural area (northern Florida, if I recall correctly), and the video I cited earlier discusses how small-town cops have more incentive to not be jerks because, well, small towns. I'm not convinced, but whatever.

Because such abuse of residents' civil rights happens, it's perfectly reasonable that any person encountering police--whose job is to find reasons to arrest people, after all--would take self-protective actions, including recording EVERY encounter with any cop, knowing how to not answer any questions that don't need answering, etc. Too many of my marginalized neighbors have lost their lives because cops are so bad at de-escalation.

A cop ordering me to put my phone down is afraid of being held accountable for their actions (remember the saying "If you aren't doing anything wrong, you don't have reason to worry?"). Recording encounters with cops is a First Amendment and Fourth Amendment right, in my humble opinion. If a cop is acting as a cop, they are acting as a representative of the government, and have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

That you have had what are apparently universal good outcomes with cops of various agencies is marvelous. A privilege, frankly. People close to me have not had that good fortune. I believe in the lived experiences of my neighbors.
You are quoting the experience of far too many racial minorities, especially Black people, in this country. It's unfortunate that some people don't want to accept that bad police behaviour is far too common, until it starts happening to them. That's why yes, it's important to record everything that happens, every part of any encounter, with the police. Usually that's one of these modern cell phones, due to their ubiquity. And because the police might further violate your rights by confiscating your cell phone by force, inlcuding at gunpoint, it's equally important that you use full-disk encryption on your cell phone if at all possible. Many phones don't have that by default, but some do.

I'm glad that a Native American like Ylatkit has not yet had a bad experience with the police. Unfortunately, there are too many George Floyds, Julian Alexanders, and Brionna Taylors out there who have.
"SF Liberal With A Gun + Free Software Advocate"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/
Image

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

31
From what I am reading here the major issue is the collateral damage and there a smaller issue about if the cops should have fired in the first place.

Cops fired if I got it right 9 shots at close range and struck 4 people. The fare jumper seems to have had a weapon and was unresponsive to being hit by tasers. If the cops then should have fired I am not sure since I have not seen the video. But in any case at what is likely close range they should not have missed so many times.
Seems like they need more practice in their marksmanship.
In a nearby county to mine in NW FL an acorn hitting a car resulted into 2 cops opening fire on a car containing a handcuffed citizen. In another incident, officer knocks on a door but hiding himself form being viewed from the peep hole viewer, shoots a resident holding a gun pointed down at the floor.
I have no good answers.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest