"Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

1
The NYPD is investigating the chaos that unfolded after police opened fire at a subway station, leaving an officer, a suspect and two innocent bystanders shot. It happened shortly after 3 p.m. Sunday at the L Train platform at Van Sinderen and Sutter avenues in Brownsville. It started when police say the two officers followed a 37-year-old man up the stairs who hadn't paid his fare." The officers are asking him to stop. The male is refusing to stop at a certain point on the platform. The male, he mutters the words, 'I'm going to kill you if you don't stop following me,'" said NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey. That verbal threat became a physical one as the suspect pulled a knife from his pocket. Officers told the man to drop the weapon but the suspect told officers they would have to shoot him, Maddrey said.

The confrontation moved inside a train that had just pulled into the station and that's where police opened fire after tasering the suspect didn't work. The bullets that flew inside the car and onto the platform struck the suspect and two passengers - a 26-year-old woman and a 49-year-old man - as well as a 40-year-old officer. On Monday, the shot officer remained hospitalized at Brookdale University Hospital. It is unclear if the officer was hit by a bullet or fragment that came from his partner's gun. The 37-year-old suspect remains in critical condition at Kings County Hospital. The 49-year-old male bystander struck in the head is in critical condition and the 26-year-old woman, also a bystander, was grazed in the leg by a bullet and is stable.

An NYPD official estimated the suspect was about seven feet from the NYPD officers at the time they opened fire, well within their "zone of safety" of 21 feet. The NYPD Force Investigation Division will investigate. Several videos circulating on social media and internally in the police department show chaos as subway riders rush on the elevated subway platform to get away from the gunfire. Former NYPD Chief of Detectives Robert Boyce said he believes police bodycam video will tell the whole story. "The tactics are a little bit different in the subways, you have to understand , it's a very condensed environment with a lot of people," Boyce said. "People are carrying weapons onto the subway system and it has to be dealt with, but you act within your tactics and your instincts and your training and that's where this goes."
https://abc7ny.com/post/brooklyn-subway ... /15310417/

So in, you know, a few hours after the shooting, police officials got on stage at a news conference and said that police had not only shot Mickles [guy who didn't pay fare] but also shot two bystanders, a 49-year-old man in the head - that man is in critical condition - and grazed a 26-year-old woman. She's luckily in stable condition. They also shot a fellow police officer. Luckily, he's also in stable condition.

We actually got video of the aftermath of the shooting. It's been sort of floating around on social media. In the video, you can see at least two men lying inside two separate train cars. So we're asking questions. You know, why did enforcing fare evasion result in four people getting shot, including a police officer? How exactly did this play out, and why were two people shot in two separate train cars?
You know, policing the subways and policing fare evasion has been a huge focus for New York City mayor Eric Adams and the police department. They've spent over 150 million more dollars on officer overtime. They've flooded the transit system with over a thousand more cops every day. Police are issuing tens of thousands more criminal summons than they used to for people who don't pay their subway fare under our mayor and are making more arrests.

Actually, earlier this year, I analyzed data from every single subway station in New York City and found that at one station in Brooklyn - actually, the station right next to where this shooting took place - you're 40 times more likely to get arrested for not paying your ticket than the average station.
https://www.npr.org/2024/09/16/nx-s1-51 ... with-knife
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

3
sikacz wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 9:33 am Sometimes trying to stop a fare jumper shouldn’t lead to shots fired. Perhaps they should have let him go and alerted other stations.
Yup for a roughly $2.90 fare, 2 people are in critical condition shot in the head and 2 are stable. Train car shootings are something for TV and movies, too many innocent bystanders.

NYC Mayor Eric Adams and his inner circle are still being investigated by the FBI for bribery, the NYPD Commissioner resigned because he also faces investigation and his chief of staff quickly filed for retirement. Two retired NY Fire Department (FDNY) chiefs have been charged with accepting bribes. Don't know when the shoes will stop dropping.
Last edited by highdesert on Tue Sep 17, 2024 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

5
Countdown to the re introduction of the term "collateral damage" into our profit-oriented press publications. Like the new term "sane washing" re: the orange shit stain's demented ramblings, "collateral damage" would seek to normalize shooting all kinds of folks to protect a $2.90 corporate loss.

CDF

CDF
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

6
Silly me, sitting here thinking that cops had better training than that.

Well, no, not really. My actual thought is that there is NOTHING so trivial that it would not lead to multiple cops firing multiple rounds and killing at least one person and injuring others. Cops are terrible shooters, in the main, and many of them have zero business handling firearms.
Eventually I'll figure out this signature thing and decide what I want to put here.

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

8
"Zone of safety"?

Jesus christ. Now everyone is going to come to class thinking 21 feet has something to do with safety and the NYPD.

The Tueller Drill is already confusing and difficult to teach, as this article shows. Whoever wrote it doesn't understand it.

When a cop opens fire, assuming a good shoot, he or she is no longer dealing with the original allegation, and the reason he or she became involved no longer matters.
"When I have your wounded." -- Major Charles L. Kelly, callsign "Dustoff", refusing to acknowledge that an L.Z. was too hot, moments before being killed by a single shot, July 1st, 1964.

"Touch it, dude!"

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

9
BearPaws wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 6:20 pm Cops are terrible shooters, in the main, and many of them have zero business handling firearms.
True story:

"Why are wearing a vest? You never wear a vest."

"I'm teaching cops."

"Oh! I see."

I actually have a theory that because cops point weapons at people on a regular basis, they become desensitized to the safety rules.
"When I have your wounded." -- Major Charles L. Kelly, callsign "Dustoff", refusing to acknowledge that an L.Z. was too hot, moments before being killed by a single shot, July 1st, 1964.

"Touch it, dude!"

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

10
You may be right, Ylatkit!

I keep thinking of a couple of events.

One is the Miramar Shooting, during which at least one cop fired into the solid metal side of a UPS delivery vehicle. What was the target? The UPS driver was inside that box, how did the cop know he wouldn't hit the UPS driver, or did that even matter? The vehicle had GPS tracking, so it wasn't like they couldn't find a better place to set up an ambush. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Miramar_shootout

The other is closer to home. During the no-knock raid in which LMPD thugs killed Breonna Taylor (about ten miles from where I'm sitting as I type this), Brett Hankison dumped a mag through a patio door with curtains drawn behind it, thinking (using that term very loosely) he was firing at muzzle flashes from a gun pointed outward. Three of his rounds entered the apartment upstairs from Taylor's. Hankison was charged with endangering the neighbor. Side note: Hankison had done some off-duty "security" work at a tavern in a suburb, and faced a couple of complaints from women who said he imposed himself on them (SA).

If this country isn't going to defund the police, we must at the very least disarm them.
Eventually I'll figure out this signature thing and decide what I want to put here.

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

11
I don't have a non-paywalled linke to this article, but the headline really says what you need to know: "The NYPD Spent $150 Million to Catch Farebeaters Who Cost the MTA $104,000"

https://hellgatenyc.com/the-nypd-spent- ... ta-104000/

Combine this with the fact that the cop thought $2.90 was worth killing someone over and see just had bad the cops are in this.

Also, since 4 people were shot, I assume this will go into the mass shooting databases, right? Right?
109+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

15
Public transportation is treated ask a tax supported public good in many larger cities. It goes along with city-wide Wi-fi internet and primary education for all children. Something to consider when allocating resources wisely.
It looks like wisdom was sorely lacking in every level of organization that led to this situation IMHO.
"It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of non-violence to cover impotence. There is hope for a violent man to become non-violent. There is no such hope for the impotent." -Gandhi

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

17
BearPaws wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 9:52 pm You may be right, Ylatkit!

I keep thinking of a couple of events.

One is the Miramar Shooting, during which at least one cop fired into the solid metal side of a UPS delivery vehicle. What was the target? The UPS driver was inside that box, how did the cop know he wouldn't hit the UPS driver, or did that even matter? The vehicle had GPS tracking, so it wasn't like they couldn't find a better place to set up an ambush. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Miramar_shootout

The other is closer to home. During the no-knock raid in which LMPD thugs killed Breonna Taylor (about ten miles from where I'm sitting as I type this), Brett Hankison dumped a mag through a patio door with curtains drawn behind it, thinking (using that term very loosely) he was firing at muzzle flashes from a gun pointed outward. Three of his rounds entered the apartment upstairs from Taylor's. Hankison was charged with endangering the neighbor. Side note: Hankison had done some off-duty "security" work at a tavern in a suburb, and faced a couple of complaints from women who said he imposed himself on them (SA).

If this country isn't going to defund the police, we must at the very least disarm them.
It's not that we should defund the police. I've never believed in that. Rather, what we should do is *prosecute* the bad actors in the police department, the same way that you and I would be prosecuted were we to shoot people. This notion of "qualified immunity" really needs revamping, because it's much, much more difficult--in many cases, almost impossible--to get a conviction against a bad-actor police officer than a bad-actor who isn't a cop.

Also, it goes to who is allowed into the police academies and who precincts recruit. If there's any evidence of "aggressive personality", i. e. tends to display aggression, that should be an automatic disqualifier for the police forces. You want to be aggressive, there's a place for that, and it's called the Infantry or Special Forces, i. e. you're fighting against either invading foreign troops or you're sent to an overseas battlefield. The police are not the Army (or any other component of the DoD) and should not be treated or trained as such.
"SF Liberal With A Gun + Free Software Advocate"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/
Image

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

18
CowboyT wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 2:31 pm
It's not that we should defund the police. I've never believed in that. Rather, what we should do is *prosecute* the bad actors in the police department, the same way that you and I would be prosecuted were we to shoot people. This notion of "qualified immunity" really needs revamping, because it's much, much more difficult--in many cases, almost impossible--to get a conviction against a bad-actor police officer than a bad-actor who isn't a cop.

Also, it goes to who is allowed into the police academies and who precincts recruit. If there's any evidence of "aggressive personality", i. e. tends to display aggression, that should be an automatic disqualifier for the police forces. You want to be aggressive, there's a place for that, and it's called the Infantry or Special Forces, i. e. you're fighting against either invading foreign troops or you're sent to an overseas battlefield. The police are not the Army (or any other component of the DoD) and should not be treated or trained as such.
Agreed. Let's bring back accountability and being held responsible for our actions. Whether that be politicians, police, or anyone else. You do stupid shit that endangers others? Prosecution for you. Why are we always throwing babies out with the bath water?

VooDoo
Tyrants disarm the people they intend to oppress. Hope is not a Plan.

Dot 'em if ya got 'em!

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

19
CowboyT wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 2:31 pm

Also, it goes to who is allowed into the police academies and who precincts recruit. If there's any evidence of "aggressive personality", i. e. tends to display aggression, that should be an automatic disqualifier for the police forces. You want to be aggressive, there's a place for that, and it's called the Infantry or Special Forces, i. e. you're fighting against either invading foreign troops or you're sent to an overseas battlefield. The police are not the Army (or any other component of the DoD) and should not be treated or trained as such.
It is said that, in the US, cops don't become thugs. Thugs become cops to be worse thugs.

THAT has to change. As it is, there are enough thugs in blue uniforms that I can rightly assume that any cop who wants to interact with me is a thug, to the point that the first thing I do is start recording video with audio.
Eventually I'll figure out this signature thing and decide what I want to put here.

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

20
I have never met an SPD officer, or a King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, Tribal or State cop who was a thug. I don't think I've ever actually met any federal officers. If I did, I didn't know it.

I did meet one King County Jail dude I had questions about, but he ate his gun.
"When I have your wounded." -- Major Charles L. Kelly, callsign "Dustoff", refusing to acknowledge that an L.Z. was too hot, moments before being killed by a single shot, July 1st, 1964.

"Touch it, dude!"

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

21
Newly released video footage of New York City police officers opening fire on a knife-wielding man at a Brooklyn subway station did not quell anger over their inadvertent shooting of two bystanders, including one who was hit in the head during the burst of gunfire. The police made the edited, 17-minute video public on Friday amid substantial criticism of the shooting. The graphic footage, captured by cameras worn by the two officers and other cameras in the station and on a subway car, shows a confrontation that began with a man entering the system without paying and two officers forcing him to leave. That initial encounter ended with the man, Derrell Mickles, going out through the turnstile while holding what appears to be an open folding knife in his right hand while the officers follow him at a short distance, the video shows. A second encounter that began about 10 minutes later ended with Mr. Mickles, an officer and the two bystanders wounded.

The shooting, at the Sutter Avenue L station last Sunday, is being examined by the Police Department’s Force Investigation Division and the Brooklyn district attorney’s office. Police leaders and Mayor Eric Adams have said the shooting was justified under the department’s rules because Mr. Mickles had a weapon and threatened the officers with it. But critics have accused the police of overreacting in a dangerous way and escalating what began as the enforcement of the minor offense of fare evasion into unnecessary violence. The events that led to the shooting began at around 3 p.m. with Mr. Mickle’s first attempt at evading the fare, the footage shows. Two officers, Edmund Mays and Alex Wong, follow him into the station, and he leaves moments later with what appears to be a knife in his hand, the footage shows. (Just after he jumps the turnstile, two other people are seen entering without paying.)

Police officials have said that the officers asked him to leave, that he complied and that it was in connection with this interaction that they became aware he had the knife. The footage released on Friday does not make it clear when they made that realization. Minutes later, the footage shows, Mr. Mickles returns to the station, lingering near the emergency gate briefly before walking through it as someone comes out. The officers follow him through the gate and up the stairs to the platform. As he and Officer Wong follow Mr. Mickles down a narrow, nearly empty platform, they ask him repeatedly to drop the knife, which he appears to have in his right hand. He is combative, telling them to leave him alone while quickening his pace at times as the officers try to keep up. He continues to ignore their repeated commands, saying he will not drop the knife and challenging them more than once to shoot him.

An L train pulls into the elevated station, and Mr. Mickles backs away from the officers and onto one of the cars. They follow him and demand again that he drop the knife as several passengers look on. When he continues to refuse, they fire their Tasers. The devices fail to subdue him, and he leaves the car onto the platform while pulling Taser prongs out of his shirt. The footage shows Mr. Mickles rushing down the platform toward Officer Mays before stopping and turning to face Officer Wong. He appears to be standing still when the two officers begin firing, the video shows. Officer Wong fired six shots, and Officer Mays fired three, the video says. Mr. Mickles stumbles toward an open train car and falls in with the knife still in his hand, the footage shows. Shouts can be heard from people sitting in the car as they run. “I’m shot, I’m shot,” Officer Mays yells, his gun still extended. He and Officer Wong continue to yell at Mr. Mickles to drop the knife. An officer kicks it away, and another man can be seen picking it up. (The police said they recovered it later.) John Chell, the Police Department’s chief of patrol, defended the officers’ actions at a news conference on Wednesday. He said they had followed department guidelines, which allow the use of deadly force when officers believe their lives or the lives of others are in danger.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/20/nyre ... video.html
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

23
Ylatkit wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 11:56 pm I have never met an SPD officer, or a King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, Tribal or State cop who was a thug. I don't think I've ever actually met any federal officers. If I did, I didn't know it.

I did meet one King County Jail dude I had questions about, but he ate his gun.
Beau of the Fifth Column did a video a year or two ago discussing how small-town cops were (sometimes) less asinine than big-city cops, because they knew they were known by a bigger percentage of the community (or something like that. It's not a perfect comparison (there are small-town cops that are absolute jerks PERIOD), but in larger departments, I'll still hold to the "thugs become cops" position.

In any event, there are enough thugs who have sought out jobs as cops that it's reasonable for me to assume that ANY cop I encounter is going to be a problem, and record accordingly.
Eventually I'll figure out this signature thing and decide what I want to put here.

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

24
BearPaws wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:53 pm In any event, there are enough thugs who have sought out jobs as cops that it's reasonable for me to assume that ANY cop I encounter is going to be a problem, and record accordingly.
I would suggest that there is also enough good guys with badges to assume the opposite. I would further suggest that the majority of most agencies is good, not bad.

Therefore, my conclusion (purely for my own use, although anyone is welcome to copy it) is that when folks automatically assume the cop walking up to their car is an asshole, it doesn't reflect on the cop.

It's the flip side of cops judging you because of the clothes you're wearing, the car you're driving or the history of the neighborhood you happen to be standing in. (Or, you know, the fact that you're recording them.) Yeah, all those assumptions have bases in "logic" that are at least as valid as your assumptions.

I wouldn't accept an automatic assumption from a cop, so I reject if from you, too.

P.S. I've never heard of Beau of the Fifth column. What are his credentials? Does he live in a city?

P.P.S. What will happen if the cop orders you to put your phone down? Can you think of any valid reason why he would do that?
"When I have your wounded." -- Major Charles L. Kelly, callsign "Dustoff", refusing to acknowledge that an L.Z. was too hot, moments before being killed by a single shot, July 1st, 1964.

"Touch it, dude!"

Re: "Chaos breaks out at subway station after 4 shot when NYPD opens fire in Brooklyn"

25
Ylatkit, I could list half a dozen YouTube channels (including the one from Beau of the Fifth Column (https://www.youtube.com/@BeauoftheFifthColumn), an independent journalist whose workaholic tendencies got him close to burnout, and his wife is doing a lot of the videos now, and one from "That Dang Dad" (https://www.youtube.com/@ThatDangDad) who used to be a cop in the Los Angeles area and is now an advocate for abolition of policing as it is now done in this country, and any number of channels by civil rights advocates like https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer, and auditors' channels "Audit the Audit" and "The Lackluster Channel") that show how cops in lots of places abuse the Constitutional rights of the people they encounter. I could list books about how police "culture" abuses people (The Riders Come Out at Night, White Robes and Broken Badges and others), and research that shows that one is statistically more likely to die at the hands of a cop than of a mass shooter (https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/ ... -bx-uIOv7o). I could point to the DOJ decisions that hold departments (including the Louisville Metro Police Department, operating where I live) as exhibiting a pattern of behavior that abuses the rights of the community residents.

My point is that such abuse of the civil rights of residents of the communities happens. It's widespread. It's a feature of the police culture. It does not happen in a vacuum--it can ONLY happen if the command structure of the department encourages--or at the very least, tolerates--such behavior. One reads numerous news reports of alleged "good" cops who try to hold the bad cops accountable for such abuses, but who rapidly learn that they will not have backup if they are in trouble, so "go along to get along." That latter point is behind the saying that "if a department has thirteen hundred 'good' cops and twelve 'bad' cops, it actually has 1312 bad cops," with the 1312 indicating letters of the alphabet (1=A, etc.), suggesting that "All Cops Are Bad."

I mentioned that "Beau" lives in a rural area (northern Florida, if I recall correctly), and the video I cited earlier discusses how small-town cops have more incentive to not be jerks because, well, small towns. I'm not convinced, but whatever.

Because such abuse of residents' civil rights happens, it's perfectly reasonable that any person encountering police--whose job is to find reasons to arrest people, after all--would take self-protective actions, including recording EVERY encounter with any cop, knowing how to not answer any questions that don't need answering, etc. Too many of my marginalized neighbors have lost their lives because cops are so bad at de-escalation.

A cop ordering me to put my phone down is afraid of being held accountable for their actions (remember the saying "If you aren't doing anything wrong, you don't have reason to worry?"). Recording encounters with cops is a First Amendment and Fourth Amendment right, in my humble opinion. If a cop is acting as a cop, they are acting as a representative of the government, and have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

That you have had what are apparently universal good outcomes with cops of various agencies is marvelous. A privilege, frankly. People close to me have not had that good fortune. I believe in the lived experiences of my neighbors.
Eventually I'll figure out this signature thing and decide what I want to put here.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest