A Small Piece of History

1
I'm an amateur student of ancient history, particularly focused on that ancient Rome. I don't know why it interests me so, I just know that it does. So I'm here to display something I just acquired which I think is pretty cool: a double denarius from the Roman Empired dated 215 - 255 CE
The following statement is true: the previous statement was a lie.
Attachments
20230910_165622.jpg

Re: A Small Piece of History

4
Eris wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:00 am Nice! I wish had some ancient coins like that.
I paid just under $75 for that one on Amazon, got it within 2 days. I would love to be able to afford something like this but that's merely fantasy at this point.
CDFingers wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:10 am Yes. Very cool. I wonder how many cups of mead that coin had bought over its lifetime.

CDFingers
It's exactly those questions which make something like this so interesting to me. The hands it passed through and the circumstances over the passed 1700 years. My wife calls me a nerd, but she's the one constantly going to the library 🙃
The following statement is true: the previous statement was a lie.

Re: A Small Piece of History

7
CDFingers wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:18 am I have an 1894 m91 Finn captured Mosin-Nagant from the Sestroryetsk arsenal. Imagine the tales it could tell.

CDFingers
That, too is a piece of history I could easily lose hours in examining and imagining.
highdesert wrote: Yes very nice. Do you know which emperor? That Nero coin is beautiful, very fine and it has the price to prove it.
I haven't yet taken the time to examine it in greater detail to see if I can translate any of the inscriptions but given the date range in which it was struck I doubt it was an emperor of any great import or note.
The following statement is true: the previous statement was a lie.

Re: A Small Piece of History

8
NonServiam wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:42 am
CDFingers wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:18 am I have an 1894 m91 Finn captured Mosin-Nagant from the Sestroryetsk arsenal. Imagine the tales it could tell.

CDFingers
That, too is a piece of history I could easily lose hours in examining and imagining.
highdesert wrote: Yes very nice. Do you know which emperor? That Nero coin is beautiful, very fine and it has the price to prove it.
I haven't yet taken the time to examine it in greater detail to see if I can translate any of the inscriptions but given the date range in which it was struck I doubt it was an emperor of any great import or note.
Yup there were many Roman Emperors in the early Common Era especially in the 215-255 CE range. They probably didn't have time to create new dies and strike coins with an image of the new emperor, so used the old ones. Even in modern times, the UK still has currency and coins with Queen Elizabeth II's image, those with King Charles III will start going into circulation later this year.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: A Small Piece of History

12
Took this thing into the QC room at work and used some inspection equipment to get a more detailed look and have determined this coin was struck using dies from the reign of Gordian III -- though due to his young age he was really emperor in name only. But I won't drone on with a history lesson here.
The following statement is true: the previous statement was a lie.

Re: A Small Piece of History

14
highdesert wrote:That's neat. Yes he was young and apparently died when he was 19, during the decaying years of the Roman Empire.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gordian-III
Yes it’s an artifact from an interesting time in the Roman Empire; right at the beginning of the “Crisis of the Third century.” A very destabilized era.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_o ... rd_Century


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests