Thomas has always been more conservative than the other justices, no other justice joined his concurring opinion in this case. Kavanaugh in his concurring opinion states,
First is the question of how this decision will affect other precedents involving issues such as contraception and marriage—in particular, the decisions in Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965); Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U. S. 438 (1972); Loving v. Virginia, 388 U. S. 1 (1967); and Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015). I emphasize what the Court today states: Overruling Roe does not mean the overruling of those precedents, and does not threaten or cast doubt on those precedents.
Thomas might want to do it, but the Rule of 5 requires he have five votes and I don't see him getting them.
This decision doesn't preclude Congress from passing a law legalizing abortion nationwide, but I don't see Democrats ever having 60 votes to overcome a Senate filibuster. So there will be some states where surgical abortion is legal and some where it is not.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan