'Congress Must Act,' Says Cori Bush as Supreme Court Ends Eviction Moratorium

1
Millions of people across the U.S. are once again at imminent risk of losing their homes after the conservative-dominated Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the Biden administration's eviction moratorium, siding with a coalition of landlords and real estate companies that challenged the critical lifeline.

In an unsigned opinion, the 6-3 conservative majority ruled (pdf) that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not have the authority to implement the eviction moratorium, the latest version of which was put in place earlier this month in response to pressure from progressive lawmakers and activists.

Writing for the three dissenting liberal justices, Stephen Breyer slammed the high court's conservatives for rushing their massively consequential decision on the eviction ban without a "full briefing and argument." The moratorium on evictions for non-payment of rent was originally intended to run through October 3.

"The public interest strongly favors respecting the CDC's judgment at this moment, when over 90% of counties are experiencing high [coronavirus] transmission rates," Breyer wrote, noting that the real estate coalition's earlier argument against the eviction moratorium—that Covid-19 infections were trending downward—no longer holds.

The high court's ruling came just a day after the U.S. Treasury Department released figures showing that 89% of rental assistance funds approved by Congress have not yet been distributed—a problem that some critics have attributed to the faulty design of the federal aid program.

Housing experts and advocates estimate that total rental debt in the U.S. currently amounts to around $21.3 billion, with households that are behind on rent owing $3,300 on average.

Congress has approved $46.5 billion in emergency rental assistance.

In a statement late Thursday, Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) called the Supreme Court's ruling "disastrous" and said that "Congress must act immediately to prevent mass evictions."

Earlier this month, Bush and other progressive lawmakers camped out on the steps of the U.S. Capitol building to protest the expiration of a previous CDC eviction moratorium. Days after the demonstration began, the CDC authorized a new eviction ban that covered around 90% of the country.

"We are in an unprecedented and ongoing crisis that demands compassionate solutions that center the needs of the people and communities most in need of our help," Bush said Thursday. "We didn't sleep on those steps just to give up now... I urge my colleagues to reflect on the humanity of every single one of their unhoused, or soon-to-be unhoused, neighbors, and support a legislative solution to this eviction crisis."

While some cities and states still have moratoria in place, the Supreme Court's decision means that millions of renters who are behind on payments are set to lose their last remaining protections, setting the stage for a wave of evictions as coronavirus infections surge across the country.

"This is cruel and wrong," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "If the public health crisis hasn't ended, then the relief to survive it shouldn't either. We must immediately do everything possible to keep people in their homes. This is a matter of life and death."

According to a recent analysis by Eviction Lab, U.S. neighborhoods with the highest eviction filing rates typically have the lowest levels of vaccination against Covid-19. In some Southern states, landlord-friendly laws and procedures allow evictions to be fast-tracked, meaning the consequences of the high court's decision could be felt in the very near future.

Diane Yentel, president and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, warned that "the tragic, consequential, and entirely avoidable outcome of this ruling will be millions of people losing their homes this fall and winter, just as the Delta variant ravages communities and lives."

"Evictions risk lives and drive families deeper into poverty," said Yentel. "During a pandemic, evictions further burden overstretched hospital systems, and make it much more difficult for the country to contain the virus. Evictions have been shown to increase spread of, and potentially deaths from, Covid-19. For families and individuals, evictions are profoundly traumatizing and destabilizing. For the country, evictions are expensive. The tragic consequences of this decision will reverberate for years."

It is not yet clear what specific steps the White House and Congress—which is currently on recess—intend to take in response to the Supreme Court's ruling. In a statement, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the Biden administration was "disappointed" by the decision and urged "all entities that can prevent evictions—from cities and states to local courts, landlords, cabinet agencies—to urgently act."

Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), chair emeritus of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, argued late Thursday that "Congress should immediately come back into session and extend the moratorium."

"The Supreme Court blocking the eviction moratorium while the pandemic is killing 1,000 people a day is appalling," said Pocan.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/ ... moratorium

These unsigned SCOTUS opinions need to stop. The Justices need to sign their opinions and take the heat for their actions. Also they need to give the reasons in an opinion that brought them to the decision.

Stephen Breyer needs to retire while there is a could chance that Biden would be able to appoint another liberal to the court.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: 'Congress Must Act,' Says Cori Bush as Supreme Court Ends Eviction Moratorium

2
Not surprising, Biden stated he didn't feel an extension of the eviction moratorium was legal, it had already been to SCOTUS. Pelosi and House Democrats pushed it, so he did it and he was right. The Common Dreams gives a one sided view.
Thursday's decision was all but written in June when the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, allowed an earlier moratorium issued by the CDC to stand. At that time, Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the majority but wrote that he did that because the moratorium was set to expire in just a few weeks on July 31.

Back then, Kavanaugh, who cast the fifth and deciding vote, also wrote that he voted not to end the eviction program, "because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution" of the funds that Congress appropriated to provide rental assistance to those in need due to the pandemic.

But Kavanaugh said that in his view Congress would have to pass new and clearer legislation to extend the moratorium past July. And despite a last-minute effort in Congress to do that, lawmakers didn't have the votes.
Congress has approved nearly $50 billion to help people pay back rent and avoid eviction. But while in some states and counties that's been working well, in many others the help hasn't reached the vast majority of renters who need it.

By one estimate, 15 states still haven't managed to get even 5% of those federal dollars out the door to renters facing eviction.
With the Delta variant of COVID surging in many parts of the country, the CDC issued a more limited eviction moratorium through Oct. 3.
https://www.npr.org/2021/08/26/10246685 ... moratorium


What these Congress critters should be pushing temporary revision of the welfare law that Bill Clinton signed long ago. There is a lifetime limit of 2 to 5 years for adults and those who have used it up, can't access it any longer if they have no unemployment benefits to draw on. And they should start working on their states to free up funds already allocated for rental assistance.

I see a lot of help wanted signs all over in my rural area.
Last edited by highdesert on Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: 'Congress Must Act,' Says Cori Bush as Supreme Court Ends Eviction Moratorium

4
Nobody knows how many people are effected. Many have kept up their payments as they knew they would eventually have to pay the piper, and asking the landlords (especially the small scale) to subsidize the pandemic isn't fair-although I don't mind SIL Jarod having to eat a few late payments. But as a large scale landlord, he has a team of lawyers who have nothing else to do.

Re: 'Congress Must Act,' Says Cori Bush as Supreme Court Ends Eviction Moratorium

5
At least in the Food restaurant business, those help wanted signs are paying minimum wages or just above minimum wage. That’s why they are still looking for help. In the DFW area housing is in short supply and as soon as leases are up the landlord or management company are almost doubling the rent in some areas. All are increasing it a large amount. A one bedroom apartment in the middle of the pack, not the best or the worst is renting for $1400 a month in Dallas. Try to buy a house and they are being bought up buy corporations at over the limiting price by sometimes $10s of thousands of dollars or more. I can understand the business side of the evictions but there is also the humanitarian side we need to look at. With the minimum wage or just above it a family with two working adults can’t even afford the deposit much less the rent in most areas.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TrueTexan and 2 guests