I live in Podunk (in Montana, 150,000 sq miles with just over 1M people). Yeah, in the boonies there will probably always be a need for personal transportation. But in urban areas of nearly any size from postage stamp up to Mexico City we should design spaces differently. Sure, trains and subways are great but so are bikes and good old shoes. I wrecked my shoulder in March and do PT a block from my home but it's almost necessary to drive there to avoid being killed in the intersection. In the Netherland you can find cities with four or five grocery stores on each block plus mixed residential and business buildings. It's pretty easy in other parts of the world to walk or bike without getting killed. And it's very easy to rent a car that you need for two hours a month vs having one 24/7/365 that will be parked 99.2% of the time.
I own a Subaru (kind of the official vehicle of the Montana resident). Everyone in America seems to think cars are freedom, but are they? Aside from being an extremely inefficient way to move one person a few miles it's also a pretty big expense. There's the payment, the insurance, and the fuel. Then there's the parking when you get there and the need to park it when you're not driving it (which is most of the time). Sure, it's "freedom" in the sense of just being able to survive but you're a slave to the car, and that's not freedom. And what about the lower income classes that can't afford a car? It's not really freedom so much as another master.
Re: Pete Buttigieg busts Fox News over uninformed question on electric cars
51"Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians." Geoffrey Boothroyd

