Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.

8
Stiff wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 8:05 am If each state can’t arbitrarily restrict the right to bear arms, it can’t arbitrarily restrict the right of a woman to conduct medical procedures on her own body.
You expect logic, consistency, fairness, and "Stare Decisis" from the Six?????????

"States' Rights" has always been inconsistently applied, always in favor of the WORST policies--like slavery--and violated in favor of the WORST policies--the Fugitive Slave Act.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.

12
sikacz wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 8:55 am
CDFingers wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 7:23 am Do we want to trade a woman's right to choose for the right to carry a gun?

Case decided in the fall.

CDFingers
The two issues are not a trade. Neither restriction is acceptable.
Thanks sikacz for a twaddle-free answer.
I: ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED
II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY
III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET
IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET AND WHAT'S BEHIND IT

Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.

13
featureless wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 9:20 am
sikacz wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 8:55 am
CDFingers wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 7:23 am Do we want to trade a woman's right to choose for the right to carry a gun?

Case decided in the fall.

CDFingers
The two issues are not a trade. Neither restriction is acceptable.
Bingo!
I fear this court.

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eyed Jack

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests