Nancy Pelosi retained the speakership, the vote was 216 to 209.
The expected challenge by Republicans on Wednesday January 6th has divided the party.
While the chances of derailing Biden’s victory are virtually nonexistent — doing so would require the Democratic-controlled House, for instance, to reject electoral votes for Biden — the event provides a stage for Republican lawmakers seeking to court Trump loyalists, who may be influential in the GOP for years to come, by proclaiming their fealty to the president.
The conflict began Saturday evening, when a group of 11 Republican senators announced they would join Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in challenging the electoral tally of one or more states, making it clear the revolt would not be a minor affair but would involve more than one-fifth of Senate Republicans.
Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) responded in a blistering statement that the effort “directly undermines” Americans’ right to choose their leaders, and Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) called it an “egregious ploy.” Hawley shot back that Toomey and others were engaging in “shameless personal attacks.”
The back-and-forth spread throughout the party on Sunday as lawmakers returned to the Capitol for the swearing-in. Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), among the challengers, argued the effort was no different from Democratic objections to the 1969 and 2005 counts. In those instances, however, the losing candidate had long since conceded, and the dissent was marginal. “Our democracy is strong enough to handle conversations about electoral integrity issues,” Lankford said. Should the challenges be rejected Wednesday, Lankford said he would “absolutely” accept Biden as the rightful president. “Our goal is obviously to try to get the facts out, more than to be able to vote against the electors,” he added.
Both Lankford and Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), a former House member who was sworn in Sunday as a senator, said they were signing on to the challenge as a response to concerns from constituents worried about electoral improprieties.
But many Republicans appeared distraught that the move would put party members on record as fighting the clear outcome of a democratic election.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) said lawmakers had “a solemn responsibility to accept these electoral college votes that have been certified” by state officials. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) added, “I think the overwhelming weight of the evidence is that Joe Biden defeated my candidate, Donald Trump, and I have to live with it.”
Late Sunday, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) issued a statement saying that he shares the “concerns of many Arkansans about irregularities in the presidential election,” but that the Founders “entrusted our elections chiefly to the states—not Congress,” and that he therefore will not oppose the counting of certified electoral votes.
The rare open conflict was an embarrassing spectacle for McConnell, who has for weeks urged Republicans to refrain from disputing the electoral tally. McConnell fears it will force his members into a politically difficult choice of either defying Trump or rejecting the electorate’s verdict.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan