Re: Election results

726
lurker wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 6:13 pm december 14? he's going to claim he was cheated until he's in the ground and some of his fans will agree. and he IS and expert on cheating.
In his systematic evisceration of the Trump campaign-backed election contest in Nevada, a district judge in Carson City provided a handy guide for every conspiracy theory that fell flat. Judge James T. Russell wrote that Trump’s would-be electors “did not prove under any standard of proof” their baseless claims 25 times in his ruling.

Here is a guide to the campaign’s hypotheses, suppositions, allegations, rumors and all manner of lies that never got traction in Russell’s court.

--snp--

“Reasonable doubt is one based on reason, not mere possibility,” he added.

At least 10 variations of voter fraud theories were shot down in this manner.

--snp--

“Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any of Nevada’s election officials committed malfeasance,” the order states.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/a ... in-nevada/

And
LAS VEGAS (AP) — The Nevada state Republican Party promised Friday to appeal a judge’s refusal to overturn the results of the statewide presidential election and stop the state’s six Democratic presidential electors from voting for President-elect Joe Biden.

--snp--

“We disagree with the dismissal,” the Republican statement said.
https://apnews.com/article/election-202 ... 5eacc80a73

Fascist fucks.

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: Election results

727
“The contestants failed to meet their burden to provide credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any of the grounds set forth in (Nevada’s election contest statute) to contest the November 3, 2020 general election,” Russell wrote to close his 35-page order.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/poli ... e-2203811/


That was a good slapping down by the district judge and dismissal with prejudice. If the party appeals it would normally go to the NV court of appeals unless somehow they get to the NV supreme court.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

728
Because they keep losing in every possible way, a lot of ex-mil fucks are pressing the seditious idea that Trump should declare Martial Law, "invalidate" the Election, and have the military run a new "re-vote" that will, of course, implicitly exclude Democrats from voting for Biden. He's been replacing virtually every key civilian position in the Pentagon with equally seditious fucks who, if he orders them to engage in a coup d'état will happily do so. I expect him to fire key generals as well whom he THINKS would resist such illegal orders.

He may do it as soon as next week--on the 12th, 2 days ahead of the EC vote, there's a giant MAGA--Stop The Steal rally set for the Washington Monument. Any trouble could be the excuse he needs to invoke the Insurrection Act and use THAT to seize power. Leftist groups are TRYING to push their followers to stay far, far away, but I wouldn't put it past them to have, as they had in other cities, deliberate right-wing inciters vandalizing and attacking people--Trump's FINAL "Reichstag Fire". It's happened many times before, just not in America.

Does he have the guts and the brains to pull it off? He certain has the sadism and lack of any morals or ethic or loyalty to the nation to do it.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Election results

729
Bisbee wrote: Sat Dec 05, 2020 3:59 am Yay California! I’m glad to have worked in CA’s election if only as a symbolic gesture today to sit Biden in the WH.
Thank you, Bisbee. :beer2:

Re: Election results

730
The GOP Is the Party of Civil War

As President Donald Trump heads to Georgia for a campaign rally on Saturday, a menace is spreading across the country: a right-wing insurrection, led by the president and his supporters, to overthrow the 2020 election by intimidation or force. That threat is becoming a central issue in the Jan. 5 Georgia runoffs that will decide control of the U.S. Senate.

The insurrection has been boiling at pro-Trump rallies in the past few weeks. In Georgia, amid chants of “victory or death,” speakers have vowed to “remove” a new Democratic administration, arguing that it “doesn’t have the military on their side.” At a rally led by Donald Trump Jr., a speaker warned, “We’re getting ready to start shooting.” Last weekend in Michigan, a crowd cheered as a member of the Proud Boys declared, “We don’t want a civil war, but we’re already in one. And we’re in it to win it.” In Florida, rally leaders called the election result a “war on our homeland” and pledged, “We will not allow them to fire a man for doing his job perfect.” In Arizona, a speaker demanded the imprisonment of President-elect Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton. “We have to protect [Trump] at any cost,” he said. Another speaker denounced House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, calling for “rebellion” and adding, “I’d love to see half of these people hung by the neck.” The crowd shouted its approval.

Trump has endorsed these rallies and has advocated—and attempted—direct interference in the election. He demanded that states “stop the count.” He tweeted, contrary to some state laws, that “any vote that came in after election day will not be counted.” He said “hundreds of thousands” of votes for Biden should be nullified, or should “count toward us,” because they were tabulated outside the view of partisan Republicans. Through the intervention of Republican legislatures or the Supreme Court—three of whose members he has appointed—he insisted that “the results of the individual swing states must be overturned, and overturned immediately.”

Trump didn’t just complain. He fired the director of federal cybersecurity, Christopher Krebs, for refusing to support his lies about election fraud. He hounded the FBI and the Department of Justice—and pressured Attorney General William Barr in a face-to-face meeting—for failing to back him up. “Maybe they’re involved,” Trump said of DOJ and the FBI, in an ambiguous smear on Fox News. On Twitter, he threatened to bar or invalidate Biden’s presidency. “Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous ‘80,000,000 votes’ were not fraudulently or illegally obtained,” Trump wrote. He retweeted a declaration that absent such proof, Biden “cannot be considered ‘president’ ” and should be dismissed as an illegitimate “presidential occupant.”

In Georgia, Trump pressured Gov. Brian Kemp and other Republicans to “take charge,” invoke “emergency powers,” break a consent decree, “get tough” with Democrats, and “call in the Legislature” so Trump could “quickly and easily win the State.” He told Kemp, “Get it done!” When Ducey certified Biden’s victory in Arizona, Trump phoned in to a meeting of Republican legislators to attack the governor. He retweeted allegations that Ducey had run a “corrupt election,” “certified fraudulent election results,” and “betrayed the people of Arizona.”

The president’s legal advocates take the same hard line. On Nov. 19, in a press conference endorsed by Trump and the Republican National Committee, lawyers Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani demanded the nullification of hundreds of thousands of ballots. They denounced the FBI and suggested that “three-letter agencies”—apparently a reference to the CIA—were covering up election fraud because the agencies had used similar tricks to manipulate elections in other countries. On Wednesday, Powell repeated her conspiracy theories at a rally in Georgia with fellow pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood. Wood called the FBI “crooked” and urged Trump to fire CIA Director Gina Haspel. He called on the Republican-controlled Georgia legislature set aside Biden’s victory and authorize electors who would vote instead for Trump.

At times, Trump has praised, encouraged, or excused violence. On Nov. 5, he accused election workers of provoking Republican observers to “become somewhat violent.” On Nov. 14, he told police to crack down on left-wing assailants in street clashes, calling the culprits “Human Radical Left garbage.” The president instructed police, “Don’t hold back,” and he congratulated his supporters who “aggressively fought back” against “Antifa.” On Thanksgiving Day, after Georgia’s secretary of state, Republican Brad Raffensperger, refused Trump’s demands to intervene in the ballot count, the president branded him “an enemy of the people.”

Some conservative activists have joined Trump and his mobs in calling for muscle or violence. On Monday, right-wing radio host Eric Metaxas told Trump in an interview, “I’d be happy to die in this fight.” Joe diGenova, a Trump lawyer who shared the stage with Giuliani and Powell at the Nov. 19 press conference, said Krebs should be “taken out at dawn and shot.” On Tuesday, Wood, Powell, and Michael Flynn—the corrupt retired general who was pardoned by Trump last week—endorsed a statement calling for “limited martial law.” The statement urged Trump to “suspend the Constitution and civilian control of … elections” so that “the military” could administer “a national re-vote.” If Trump failed to get a re-vote, the statement said his supporters would “take matters into our own hands.”

Some zealots are already taking action. They’ve targeted election supervisors in several states, issuing death threats against officials in Vermont, calling for violence against the family of Arizona’s secretary of state, and orchestrating a hunt for a voting machine contractor who is now in hiding. On Monday, Gabriel Sterling, the Republican manager of Georgia’s elections, reported a death threat against an election worker, harassment of the worker’s family, and sexual threats against Raffensperger’s wife. “Stop inspiring people to commit potential acts of violence,” Sterling pleaded, addressing Trump at a televised briefing. “Someone’s going to get shot. Someone’s going to get killed.”

That night, on Twitter, Trump posted a video of Sterling’s plea. He dismissed it. He accused Raffensperger and Kemp of knowing about, and refusing to uncover, “massive voter fraud.” The next day, in a speech recorded at the White House, he denounced both men again. And at Wednesday’s rally in Georgia, Wood and Powell, accompanied by Flynn, joined the attack. Wood accused Sterling of conspiring with China to manipulate the election. He demanded that Kemp and Raffensperger be thrown in jail. “We’re going to slay Goliath, the communists, the liberals,” he vowed. “Joe Biden will never set foot in the Oval Office.”

The Republican Party and its Senate nominees in Georgia, David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, could have stood with democracy. They could have accepted Trump’s defeat and asked their supporters to unite behind the new president. Instead, they’ve embraced Trump’s lies and defiance. “We’re going to keep fighting until every illegal vote is thrown out,” Vice President Mike Pence pledged at a rally for Loeffler and Perdue in Georgia on Friday. He urged Republicans to “stand with” Trump in his challenges to the election, and he told the crowd—in a gesture of support for claims of Democratic cheating—“We’re on ’em this time.” This isn’t a party of law and order. It’s a party of civil war.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... l-war.html

They call themselves the Party of Law and Order. They are definitely not the party of law and order.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Election results

731
"party of law and order" is so yesterday that none of them remember it. "party of law and order" needs to just shut up and get in line behind "pro-life" and "party of family values". and "party of fiscal responsibility" too.
i'm retired. what's your excuse?

Re: Election results

732
lurker wrote: Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:55 pm "party of law and order" is so yesterday that none of them remember it. "party of law and order" needs to just shut up and get in line behind "pro-life" and "party of family values". and "party of fiscal responsibility" too.
A rename the GOP to the Party of Kooks and Idiots.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Election results

733
PKI has a nice ring to it !!
"Being Republican is more than a difference of opinion - it's a character flaw." "COVID can fix STUPID!"
The greatest, most aggrieved mistake EVER made by USA was electing DJT as POTUS - TWICE!!!!!

Re: Election results

734
lurker wrote: Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:55 pm "party of law and order" is so yesterday that none of them remember it. "party of law and order" needs to just shut up and get in line behind "pro-life" and "party of family values". and "party of fiscal responsibility" too.
Those tired only pillars of the GOP, their own president bashed them. They can't miraculously resurrect them, fiscal responsibility and family values are especially laughable. Not just the history making tax cuts and deficit but also going around congress to get funds to build his wall which will become like Shelley's poem Ozymandias.
I met a traveller from an antique land,
Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

735
i once shut up a trumpster (this was before i'd seen the Lincoln Project) at the range by pretending to be a traditional republican, pointing out that donald had hijacked the rep party with their consent. "where are the primaries?" i asked. "where are the other candidates?" "what about Webb, or Walsh, or Kasich?" "why don't we get to choose our candidate?"

he didn't even try to answer.
i'm retired. what's your excuse?

Re: Election results

736
George Santayana summed up our condition nicely
• Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.
• Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Election results

737
"We create our own reality."

The internet makes it easy to avoid contrary info.

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: Election results

738
The rest of the deadline dates in this election.

December 8th - "safe harbour" - deadline for states to resolve ballot disputes and certify their elections. CDF has a thread on it.

December 14th - Meeting of Electors in state capitols to vote for president and vice president. Some states celebrate it differently, in some all electors have lunch together before voting.
Each elector votes on his or her own ballot and signs it. The ballots are immediately transmitted to various people: one copy goes to the president of the U.S. Senate (who is also the vice president of the United States); this is the copy that will be officially counted later. Other copies go to the state's secretary of state, the National Archives and Records Administration, and the presiding judge in the district where the electors meet (this serves as a backup copy that would replace the official copy sent to the president of the Senate if it is lost or destroyed).
Note: If electors fail to vote for the candidate they are pledged to, they can be sanctioned by their state and in some states immediately replaced. This was upheld by SCOTUS as recently as July 6, 2020 in Chiafalo v. Washington. They are called "faithless electors".

December 23rd - Deadline for Receipt of Ballots - The electors' ballots must be received by the President of the US Senate, which is the Vice President of the US.

January 6th - Counting of the Electoral Ballots - The President of the Senate and Speaker of the House preside over a joint session of Congress. It's a formality, the votes have already been tallied and everyone knows the result. Occasionally a member objects, often is not recognized.

https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections ... llege.aspx
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

739
Here is a good thought.
Ousted cyber chief slams hypocrisy of elected GOPers: ‘They’ve accepted their outcomes and their races’

Former Department of Homeland Security official Chris Krebs on Sunday slammed Republican candidates who have accepted the outcomes of their elections but have refused to admit that President Donald Trump lost to President-elect Joe Biden.

Krebs, who is the former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, was fired by Trump after his group released a statement calling the 2020 election the most secure in U.S. history.

“Just 27 congressional Republicans have acknowledged Joe Biden’s victory,” CBS host Margaret Brennan told Krebs during a Sunday interview. “That’s 27 out of 249. Why are the majority of Republicans remaining silent on what you’re describing here as a security risk?”

“I can’t speak to what their motivations are,” Krebs noted. “The rest of them have to acknowledge that the system in place to conduct the election was legitimate. Particularly in the House, they’ve accepted their outcomes and their races. I don’t see any difference here between the presidential race.”

“It is well past the time where all leaders of the Republican Party need to accept the outcome of this race and move on and accept that Joe Biden is the president-elect,” he said.

Krebs argued that the point of elections is to “convince the losers they lost.”

“But to do that, you have to have willing participants that are honest brokers,” he explained. “And we’re just not seeing this right now. You know, every court case or filing has been rejected by the courts. And so any fraud claims, any security claims, any sorts of things along those lines, we’re just not seeing supporting evidence.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/12/ouste ... eir-races/

The Dems should demand that MoscowMitch’s election result be investigated by a third party cause we heard it from an unnamed government source that election was rigged. Offer Rudy enough money he might just take the case. :sarcasm:
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Election results

740
Georgia is set to recertify its presidential election results on Monday, which will again find Joe Biden as the winner following three counts of ballots, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said.

News of the recertification is a yet another blow to President Donald Trump, who has for weeks baselessly claimed a "rigged" election in the state and attacked election officials for not overturning the results in his favor. Monday's certification will lock in the state's results for Biden before the December 14 Electoral College vote, though Trump has continued to inveigh against Raffensperger, a Republican, and called for additional signature verification -- which is, at this point, procedurally impossible.

"We have now counted legally cast ballots three times and the results remain unchanged," Raffensperger said during a press conference Monday morning. "Whether it is the President of the United States or a failed gubernatorial candidate, disinformation regarding election administration should be condemned and rejected. Integrity matters. Truth matters."

He continued, "Today, the secretary of state's office will be recertifying our state's election results. Then the safe harbor, under the United States code to name electors, is tomorrow, and then they will meet on December 14 to officially elect the next President."
On Monday, a federal judge in Georgia dismissed two motions brought by attorney Sidney Powell aimed at reversing the election results in the state. "The plaintiffs do not have standing to bring these claims," Judge Timothy Batten ruled from the bench immediately following about an hour of arguments.

Batten also dissolved a temporary restraining order that stopped election officials from clearing the latest election data from Dominion voting machines in Cobb, Gwinnett and Cherokee counties. Election officials in Georgia have said the machines will be needed for early voting that starts next week ahead of the state's January 5 Senate runoff elections.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/07/politics ... index.html

Federal court cases remain active in Pennsylvania, but the general view among election law specialists is that the mere filing of a federal court lawsuit would not block a state's achieving safe harbor status, unless a judge had required the state to take steps that would delay its choice of electors.

"Assuming that the pending federal court litigation does not give the plaintiffs any of the remedies they are seeking, these federal cases should not affect safe harbor status, even if they go past Tuesday," said Edward Foley, an election law expert at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University.

Trump, his campaign, and Republican supporters have filed more than four dozen lawsuits since Election Day. But so far they have affected only a small number of votes in disputed state races. And no court has upheld any of the claims of fraud.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

741
The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth's election results, delivering a near fatal blow to the GOP's long-shot bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden's victory.

The Supreme Court's action is a crushing loss for Trump, who has frequently touted the high court's potential to overturn his election loss. Just hours before the court's order was released, Trump made a direct appeal to state officials and members of the Supreme Court to assist him in his efforts to subvert the will of voters, as he continually and falsely suggested there was massive voter fraud during the election.

"Let's see whether or not somebody has the courage, whether it's legislators or legislatures or a justice of the Supreme Court or a number of justices of the Supreme Court," Trump said. "Let's see if they have the courage to do what everybody in this country knows is right." Tuesday's one-line order was issued with no noted dissents or comment from any of the nine justices.
The quick action with no dissents is a signal the Supreme Court may not want to get involved in the ongoing Trump challenges, said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and University of Texas Law professor. "The fact that the justices issued a one-sentence order with no separate opinions is a powerful sign that the court intends to stay out of election-related disputes, and that it's going to leave things to the electoral process going forward," Vladeck said.

"It's hard to imagine a more quietly resounding rejection of these challenges from this court," Vladeck added. Tuesday marks the "safe harbor" deadline for the state under federal law. That means that when Congress tallies the electoral votes in January, it must accept electoral results that were certified before the deadline.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/08/politics ... index.html

Image
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

742
Better be a similar thing with the TX et al suit, I tell you what.

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: Election results

743
Sometimes, a terse decision can be a beautiful thing!
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Election results

744
Happy Safe Harbor Day!!!
"It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of non-violence to cover impotence. There is hope for a violent man to become non-violent. There is no such hope for the impotent." -Gandhi

Re: Election results

745
The Texas lawsuit engineered by Ken Paxton has no standing.
Few legal doctrines confound federal courts and litigants more than those governing the issue of standing. One of the requirements to bring a claim in federal court is the establishment of Article III standing—that is, a would-be plaintiff must establish at the outset of a case that he or she has suffered (or imminently will suffer) a concrete, particularized “injury in fact” to a legally protected interest, that the injury is fairly traceable to the defendant’s challenged action, and that a favorable judgment would likely redress the injury.
https://www.law.com/2019/09/18/standing ... 1108205552

The only injury he'll suffer is his "beloved president" won't be in the WH, it's all show.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

746
But they STILL cannot sue states other than their own in Federal Court--11th Amendment.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Election results

747
YankeeTarheel wrote: Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:02 pm But they STILL cannot sue states other than their own in Federal Court--11th Amendment.
:roflmao:

Forgot about that. Hehe.

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: Election results

748
An individual may not. A state may. The Supremes have original jurisdiction over interstate suits. Hence this.

IANAL. YMMV. TANSTAAFL. YOLO.

Re: Election results

749
The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday affirmed President-elect Joe Biden's victory in Arizona, upholding a lower court's finding that there was no misconduct, fraud or illegal voting in the general election. The ruling came hours before the so-called "safe harbor" cutoff, a federal deadline by which states must resolve election-related disputes in state courts to guarantee Congress will count their electors' votes.

Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward had initially filed the challenge in Maricopa County Superior Court, seeking to have a judge void Biden's 10,457-vote win in Arizona. In her claim, she questioned the signature verification process used by Maricopa Countyto authenticate mail-in ballots, as well as the duplication process election officials used to count ballots that tabulation machines couldn't read.

Ward brought the election contest under a state law that allows voters to dispute certified results if they suspect misconduct, illegal votes or an inaccurate count. But, over a day and a half of testimony and oral arguments, her team failed to prove anything beyond a handful of garden variety mistakes, Superior Court Judge Randall Warner said. In an order issued Tuesday after Ward appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed.

The court agreed Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results." "Elections will not be held invalid for mere irregularities unless it can be shown that the result has been affected by such irregularity," he wrote. "The validity of an election is not voided by honest mistakes or omissions unless they affect the result, or at least render it uncertain.

Noting the decision was unanimous, he concluded: "It is ordered affirming the trial court decision and confirming the election of the Biden Electors." Those 11 electors are scheduled to cast their presidential votes Monday.
While state courts resolved election contests by Tuesday evening, another challenge is pending in federal court.

That lawsuit, filed with the assistance of attorney and Trump advocate Sidney Powell, names Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and Gov. Doug Ducey as defendants.
U.S. District Court Judge Diane Humetewa heard preliminary arguments in the case Tuesday morning, after attorneys for state and county officials filed motions asking her to toss out the lawsuit.
"The election results were already certified. The governor has already transmitted the same to the United States archivist," Humetewa said. What makes this (case) different?" Haller acknowledged that there was "some overlap" with other election cases but said this lawsuit focused on Ducey and Hobbs, rather than Biden electors or county officials.
Humetewa said she would issue a ruling by Wednesday afternoon.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/po ... 487995002/

Kelli Ward the AZ Republican Chair is as wacko as Alex Jones.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Election results

750
much like Great Leader, they are desperately flailing. i wonder, from living in a Fox news/OAN thought bubble, are they surprised, having actually believed that their coman candidate was popular enough to get a clean win, or are they simply flinging poop at the wall? they certainly seem to have plenty of poop to fling. one could even say they're full of it.
i'm retired. what's your excuse?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest