Re: Trump in 2020

751
Jesus, these people...happily being suckered by the long con.

If justice prevails, this fat fuck will spend several years in Sing-Sing or Attica, dying alone in his cell from something excruciating...like a well placed shiv.
People want leadership, and in the absence of genuine leadership they'll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone.”Aaron Sorkin/Michael J Fox The American President
Subliterate Buffooery of the right...
Literate Ignorance of the left...

Re: Trump in 2020

752
rolandson wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 3:33 pm Jesus, these people...happily being suckered by the long con.

If justice prevails, this fat fuck will spend several years in Sing-Sing or Attica, dying alone in his cell from something excruciating...like a well placed shiv.
Sing Sing would really be Karmic, as his Briarcliff club is in the Town of Ossining (the prison is also in the village of Ossining). Trump has been trying to cheat the Town for years, claiming his Westchester International Club should only be assessed for a value of $1.5 million! I grew up in that area and that land, 140 acres, with a 75,000' club house has got to be worth at LEAST $100 to $150 million.

So for him to end up back in Ossining, the town he's trying to cheat, in its maximum security prison, would be very sweet!
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Trump in 2020

754
I would have thought cockroaches had better morals and cleanliness to be red hats. In any case, the pic depicts them for what the human red hats truly are in the scheme of things.
"Being Republican is more than a difference of opinion - it's a character flaw." "COVID can fix STUPID!"
The greatest, most aggrieved mistake EVER made by USA was electing DJT as POTUS - TWICE!!!!!

Re: Trump in 2020

755
Man, this is even better. The Clown Car Posse has a reputation for not buying up domain names. So, of course, when the hapless bunch launched One America News Network, they did not buy the all the appropriate domain names.

Hilarity ensues. From About Us
We are a far-right, pro-Donald Trump cable channel that goes out of our way to damage democracy with lies and amateur reporting. When we started this network, we realized nobody would take us seriously, so, we doubled down and put our efforts into supporting the large melted candle in chief.
https://www.oannetwork.com/

The grift won't even stop on Dec. 18, when the call will be for funds for 2024. Nor on Jan 20, when the grift will shift to the legal defense fund.

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: Trump in 2020

756
Speculation is about that Trump will either buy or buy into OANN or Newsmax or maybe both and have a regular daily spot like Hannity and Carlson on Fox and the oldest Limbaugh, to spew his usual garbage and become the alt-WH. He'll lose the title POTUS from Twitter and Facebook when he leaves office and needs to stay in touch with his base.

The Lincoln Project is turning itself into a media company, so can't wait to see what they come up with in their war against Trump and Trumpism.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Trump in 2020

758
I think like all ex-Presidents his relevancy will fade much more rapidly. None of the former Presidents of our lifetime, with the exception of Jimmy Carter, have been particularly relevant. Even Obama doesn't yet shine like Carter has, who built a whole, new magnificent career that won him a Nobel Prize. Only William Howard Taft had a post-POTUS career that outdoes Carter--as Chief Justice of the SCOTUS for 9 years.
What did the ex-Presidents of my lifetime achieve? I can't answer that but:

Hoover--died when I was a young child in 1964. He figured FDR would fail so miserably, that, like Cleveland, the country would turn back to him.

Truman--left office highly unpopular and I'm not much aware of anything significant he did afterward. He died when I was in HS in 1972.

Eisenhower--He actually was called in by JFK for advice after he had completely fouled up the Bay of Pigs travesty. Apparently Ike dressed him down about mis-using advice and advisors, and Kennedy took it to heart. Ike died in the spring of 1969--I was in middle school.

LBJ: Died just 3 years after leaving the White House, also in 1972.

Nixon: Managed to completely sabotage his whole attempt to rehabilitate his reputation when his interview with lightweight David Frost went totally thermonuclear "If the President does it, it's not illegal" Oops. He did, however, negotiate a truce between Ford and Carter when all 3 were sent to represent Reagan at Sadat's funeral. Unlike Trump, Nixon really was a skilled and talented deal-maker. He died in 1994 when he had left "do not resuscitate" instructions.

Ford: Strained for relevancy in the Republican Party with the one last gasp being a 2nd run at VP with Reagan, only to be cast aside for Bush. I give him credit for pushing HARD to bring his party back from fanaticism and obstructionism, and to recognize that Democrats ARE just as "patriotic" simply with the "wrong" policies to help the nation. Unfortunately, we all know he failed at that. He died in 2006.

Carter: Habitat for Humanity here in the USA, and the Carter Center as the ONE American NGO trusted to monitor suspicious elections abroad. If Trump and the GOP TRULY believed the election was going to be "rigged" they should have called on the Carter Center! Naturally, since it was all bullshit, they couldn't afford the risk...oops! President Carter is now very frail, and I wish him a recovery and many more years!

Reagan: His post-presidency was inconsequential, other than, in 1994, while he was still relatively lucid, announcing to the world that he had Alzheimer's and was withdrawing from public life. He died in 2004. Nancy Reagan became quite the activist for stem cell research into causes and cures for Alzheimer's going against the Party. Then there' Ron Reagan "Avowed Atheist, not afraid of going to Hell"!

Bush I: Became involved with some rather shady investment groups, and advised his son to use tried-and -true advisors: Cheney and Rumsfeld. Didn't work out so well. But he did successfully shepherd 2 sons to becoming governors and one to the Presidency (if you think that's a positive). He died 2 years ago.

Clinton: Not sure what Clinton has himself achieved since leaving office.

Bush II: Paints, has made it clear he does NOT approve of Trump, but generally stays out of the limelight.

Obama: He would have stayed working on quiet charities, but the vulgar boor, totally violating all precedents NOT to criticize predecessors, has blamed EVERYTHING that has gone wrong on Obama, even things that didn't go wrong, has taken credit for anything that has gone right, has accused Obama falsely of "the greatest crime in our history", namely, properly, and appropriately, investigating Trump's ties to Putin. This has forced Obama to come out and openly fight back at the slanderous garbage and work hard for Biden. Who Knows what he'll do going forward?

Which brings me back to Trump. He'll make noise, whine, complain that Biden's "incompetent" for not being able to fix what Trump DELIBERATELY has broken and keeps on breaking, but not being nearly as sharp as Limbaugh, or even Hannity, he'll be more like Alex Jones--and he WILL get sued for slander, unprotected by being POTUS, because he just cannot stop telling lies about people. Presuming, of course, he's not in prison.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Trump in 2020

759
Sleep tight and dream a dream of Trump resigning and Pence pardoning him and nominating him for a Federal Judgeship and McConnel ...
To be vintage it must be older than me!
The next gun I buy will be the next to last gun I ever buy. PROMISE!
jim

Re: Trump in 2020

760
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:06 pm I think like all ex-Presidents his relevancy will fade much more rapidly. None of the former Presidents of our lifetime, with the exception of Jimmy Carter, have been particularly relevant. Even Obama doesn't yet shine like Carter has, who built a whole, new magnificent career that won him a Nobel Prize. Only William Howard Taft had a post-POTUS career that outdoes Carter--as Chief Justice of the SCOTUS for 9 years.
What did the ex-Presidents of my lifetime achieve? I can't answer that but:

Hoover--died when I was a young child in 1964. He figured FDR would fail so miserably, that, like Cleveland, the country would turn back to him.

Truman--left office highly unpopular and I'm not much aware of anything significant he did afterward. He died when I was in HS in 1972.

Eisenhower--He actually was called in by JFK for advice after he had completely fouled up the Bay of Pigs travesty. Apparently Ike dressed him down about mis-using advice and advisors, and Kennedy took it to heart. Ike died in the spring of 1969--I was in middle school.

LBJ: Died just 3 years after leaving the White House, also in 1972.

Nixon: Managed to completely sabotage his whole attempt to rehabilitate his reputation when his interview with lightweight David Frost went totally thermonuclear "If the President does it, it's not illegal" Oops. He did, however, negotiate a truce between Ford and Carter when all 3 were sent to represent Reagan at Sadat's funeral. Unlike Trump, Nixon really was a skilled and talented deal-maker. He died in 1994 when he had left "do not resuscitate" instructions.

Ford: Strained for relevancy in the Republican Party with the one last gasp being a 2nd run at VP with Reagan, only to be cast aside for Bush. I give him credit for pushing HARD to bring his party back from fanaticism and obstructionism, and to recognize that Democrats ARE just as "patriotic" simply with the "wrong" policies to help the nation. Unfortunately, we all know he failed at that. He died in 2006.

Carter: Habitat for Humanity here in the USA, and the Carter Center as the ONE American NGO trusted to monitor suspicious elections abroad. If Trump and the GOP TRULY believed the election was going to be "rigged" they should have called on the Carter Center! Naturally, since it was all bullshit, they couldn't afford the risk...oops! President Carter is now very frail, and I wish him a recovery and many more years!

Reagan: His post-presidency was inconsequential, other than, in 1994, while he was still relatively lucid, announcing to the world that he had Alzheimer's and was withdrawing from public life. He died in 2004. Nancy Reagan became quite the activist for stem cell research into causes and cures for Alzheimer's going against the Party. Then there' Ron Reagan "Avowed Atheist, not afraid of going to Hell"!

Bush I: Became involved with some rather shady investment groups, and advised his son to use tried-and -true advisors: Cheney and Rumsfeld. Didn't work out so well. But he did successfully shepherd 2 sons to becoming governors and one to the Presidency (if you think that's a positive). He died 2 years ago.

Clinton: Not sure what Clinton has himself achieved since leaving office.

Bush II: Paints, has made it clear he does NOT approve of Trump, but generally stays out of the limelight.

Obama: He would have stayed working on quiet charities, but the vulgar boor, totally violating all precedents NOT to criticize predecessors, has blamed EVERYTHING that has gone wrong on Obama, even things that didn't go wrong, has taken credit for anything that has gone right, has accused Obama falsely of "the greatest crime in our history", namely, properly, and appropriately, investigating Trump's ties to Putin. This has forced Obama to come out and openly fight back at the slanderous garbage and work hard for Biden. Who Knows what he'll do going forward?

Which brings me back to Trump. He'll make noise, whine, complain that Biden's "incompetent" for not being able to fix what Trump DELIBERATELY has broken and keeps on breaking, but not being nearly as sharp as Limbaugh, or even Hannity, he'll be more like Alex Jones--and he WILL get sued for slander, unprotected by being POTUS, because he just cannot stop telling lies about people. Presuming, of course, he's not in prison.
Time will tell. Trump has tasted real power and all the trappings of the presidency and he wants it back, preferably permanently. All the slimebags like Cruz, Rubio, Cotton, Pompeo...are just salivating over the votes Trump won while still losing the election. They're trying to figure out how to grab Trump voters for themselves while not alienating Trump.

I really hope that Trump voters just get on with their lives and sideline Trump and this election. It's not going to happen quickly if they're still listening to right wing media, but Fox might slowly disengage from Trump and start focusing on other candidates for 2024.

Harry Truman was a huge contrast to FDR, he wasn't college educated and didn't have the patrician background of the Roosevelts. Yet he accomplished a lot and is probably more appreciated now than when he left office. When he left the WH he went back to Independence, MO his home. Known for his plain speaking, his daily "constitutions" and of course referring to his wife Bess as The Boss. Politics was LBJs life, he really had no hobbies and he didn't adjust well to retirement. Doubtful that Trump will retire and paint landscapes and only come out for the occasional fund raiser, like W.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Trump in 2020

761
President Donald Trump on Sunday spoke with Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo -- his first TV interview since the election. The conversation was riddled with lies and conspiracy theories. "This election was a fraud; it was a rigged election." Trump told Bartiromo. In response, the Fox anchor reflected the president's anger, saying, "This is disgusting and we cannot allow America's election to be corrupted."

The interview highlighted that Trump is "unable or unwilling to accept reality," CNN's Chief Media Correspondent Brian Stelter said on "Reliable Sources" Sunday. In addition to Trump's unwillingness to acknowledge Joe Biden won the election, Bartioromo's unchallenged acceptance of Trump's false narrative also presents a danger to American democracy, said CNN's Senior Media Reporter Oliver Darcy on "Reliable Sources." "News organizations — and I think Fox claims to be one — have a responsibility," Darcy said. "The president of the United States is trying to overturn the election. ...Frankly, there is not much daylight between Maria and [Infowars conspiracy theorist] Alex Jones."
Trump's disinformation campaign about the election is less a cohesive strategy and more about throwing spaghetti at the wall in the hope that something sticks, said Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution said, "What he's running right now is a classic Russian-style disinformation campaign," Rauch said. He added that Trump's intention is to "flood the zone" and "confuse people" by pushing out conspiracy theories, lies and half-truths.

The fact that his conspiracy theories have gained so much traction shows that Trump's strategy has been effective at gaining support from Republicans -- if not for overturning the election result. When it comes to Trump's skills in this area, Rauch said, "I think he's better than Putin."

Rauch added that President-elect Joe Biden has done a good job of "not rising to the bait of every single conspiracy that's thrown out there."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/29/media/ba ... index.html
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Trump in 2020

762
I don’t believe Trump wants to “win it back”. That would imply he feels like he has a chance to avoid the plethora of legal and personal challenges that face him upon losing the cloak of office. Sad Trump pics show he realizes he will have to be fighting, not for the privileges of office again but, for sheer survival come January. Megalomania will have him see all this as vindictive persecution rather than the result of his failed choices in life. But no, Trump will not see a path back to the White House. His ticker will give out soon under the weight of his challenges and his addiction to fast food. His last words something akin to, “It’s not fair...”

Meanwhile, a large portion of America refusing to accept his “untimely death”, will continue to report Trump sightings in Memphis and throughout the South, the kind of places Trump felt nothing but derision for when he was alive.
"It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of non-violence to cover impotence. There is hope for a violent man to become non-violent. There is no such hope for the impotent." -Gandhi

Re: Trump in 2020

763
sig230 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:26 pm Sleep tight and dream a dream of Trump resigning and Pence pardoning him and nominating him for a Federal Judgeship and McConnel ...
Nah, he'd simply condemn everyone to death, and be overturned on every decision. Besides, he'd have to work too hard, and actually have to read the briefs...and he can't read. My dream is Mike Pence is SUPPOSED to pardon Trump...and doesn't, maybe even starts investigations into Trump before the 20th! :roflmao: Because THAT would poison Trump's 2024 chances!
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Trump in 2020

764
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:35 pm
sig230 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:26 pm Sleep tight and dream a dream of Trump resigning and Pence pardoning him and nominating him for a Federal Judgeship and McConnel ...
Nah, he'd simply condemn everyone to death, and be overturned on every decision. Besides, he'd have to work too hard, and actually have to read the briefs...and he can't read. My dream is Mike Pence is SUPPOSED to pardon Trump...and doesn't, maybe even starts investigations into Trump before the 20th! :roflmao: Because THAT would poison Trump's 2024 chances!
But then McConnell would threaten Pence with impeachment and conviction.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Trump in 2020

765
TrueTexan wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:52 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:35 pm
sig230 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:26 pm Sleep tight and dream a dream of Trump resigning and Pence pardoning him and nominating him for a Federal Judgeship and McConnel ...
Nah, he'd simply condemn everyone to death, and be overturned on every decision. Besides, he'd have to work too hard, and actually have to read the briefs...and he can't read. My dream is Mike Pence is SUPPOSED to pardon Trump...and doesn't, maybe even starts investigations into Trump before the 20th! :roflmao: Because THAT would poison Trump's 2024 chances!
But then McConnell would threaten Pence with impeachment and conviction.
No, he wouldn't. McConnell can count to 67. And why would Nancy Pelosi bring an impeachment up in the House for that?
Remember: The House impeaches, the Senate rules on Impeachment, and conviction takes 2/3s--67 votes.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Trump in 2020

767
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:21 pm
TrueTexan wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:52 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:35 pm
sig230 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:26 pm Sleep tight and dream a dream of Trump resigning and Pence pardoning him and nominating him for a Federal Judgeship and McConnel ...
Nah, he'd simply condemn everyone to death, and be overturned on every decision. Besides, he'd have to work too hard, and actually have to read the briefs...and he can't read. My dream is Mike Pence is SUPPOSED to pardon Trump...and doesn't, maybe even starts investigations into Trump before the 20th! :roflmao: Because THAT would poison Trump's 2024 chances!
But then McConnell would threaten Pence with impeachment and conviction.
No, he wouldn't. McConnell can count to 67. And why would Nancy Pelosi bring an impeachment up in the House for that?
Remember: The House impeaches, the Senate rules on Impeachment, and conviction takes 2/3s--67 votes.
But remember Vladimir McConnell only follows the rules when it serves him. Otherwise he is of the opinion that he rules and makes the rules.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Trump in 2020

768
TrueTexan wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 5:42 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:21 pm
TrueTexan wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:52 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:35 pm

Nah, he'd simply condemn everyone to death, and be overturned on every decision. Besides, he'd have to work too hard, and actually have to read the briefs...and he can't read. My dream is Mike Pence is SUPPOSED to pardon Trump...and doesn't, maybe even starts investigations into Trump before the 20th! :roflmao: Because THAT would poison Trump's 2024 chances!
But then McConnell would threaten Pence with impeachment and conviction.
No, he wouldn't. McConnell can count to 67. And why would Nancy Pelosi bring an impeachment up in the House for that?
Remember: The House impeaches, the Senate rules on Impeachment, and conviction takes 2/3s--67 votes.
But remember Vladimir McConnell only follows the rules when it serves him. Otherwise he is of the opinion that he rules and makes the rules.
But, he NEVER (AFAIK) breaks the Law (at least not in Senate). As obnoxious and hypocritical as he is, he always plays by the Senate's official rules. Even when they are suspended, he does it according the Senate's rules. That's why he's so much more brilliant that Trump--he plays the rules the way Itzhak Perlman plays the strings of his violin.

Besides, once Trump's power is broken, MoscowMitch will drop him -- all he worships is power.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Trump in 2020

770
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:31 pm
But, he NEVER (AFAIK) breaks the Law (at least not in Senate). As obnoxious and hypocritical as he is, he always plays by the Senate's official rules. Even when they are suspended, he does it according the Senate's rules. That's why he's so much more brilliant that Trump--he plays the rules the way Itzhak Perlman plays the strings of his violin.

Besides, once Trump's power is broken, MoscowMitch will drop him -- all he worships is power.
He makes the rule about no president can appoint Federal Judges close to a presidential election. So Obama can’t appoint Garland. Now how many has he pushed through in the last six months.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: Trump in 2020

772
TrueTexan wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:37 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:31 pm
But, he NEVER (AFAIK) breaks the Law (at least not in Senate). As obnoxious and hypocritical as he is, he always plays by the Senate's official rules. Even when they are suspended, he does it according the Senate's rules. That's why he's so much more brilliant that Trump--he plays the rules the way Itzhak Perlman plays the strings of his violin.

Besides, once Trump's power is broken, MoscowMitch will drop him -- all he worships is power.
He makes the rule about no president can appoint Federal Judges close to a presidential election. So Obama can’t appoint Garland. Now how many has he pushed through in the last six months.
Those aren't laws or Senate rules. They are merely bullshit justifications for whatever his raw power play of the moment is. Most Republicans have been that way for decades--Orren Hatch and Chuck Grassley, especially, now Graham, Cruz, Rubio, et al. None of it breaks laws, or the Senate rules even though it's immoral, unethical, and dishonest.

Sure, he's a lying, hypocritical, cold-blooded reptilian piece of excrement who deserves to burn in the Hell I don't believe in who is, actually, far more dangerous to our Democratic Republic than Trump. But that doesn't mean he doesn't abide by Law and Senate Rules. That's why he's so dangerous. Graham may well face an ethics investigation for interfering in the Georgia election, but McConnell's far too smart for that. He's waiting to see which way the wave breaks and then you can be sure he'll be riding it, expertly.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Trump in 2020

773
Meant to post this earlier, Jennifer Mercieca is a professor of historical political rhetoric at TAMU and she wrote a book "Demagogue for President: The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump" She talks about all the techniques Trump uses and what makes him different.

C-SPAN interview
https://www.c-span.org/video/?470529-1/ ... -president

She was also on Lincoln Project TV which was a more relaxed interview. She talks about Biden and QAnon. (20:20 to 43:00).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfXW8QYCz5I
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: Trump in 2020

774
Update: The Coup-o-meter has moved one notch toward democracy today. Many of our updates focus on specific events, but today we're looking at a combination of factors that point to increasing momentum for a peaceful transition of power. At the same time, Trump's continued insistence on pushing the false story that the election was rigged has further eroded American's faith in our democratic system, a development that could mean long term harm to the country.
https://isthisacoup.com/

CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eye Jack

Re: Trump in 2020

775
President Donald Trump told a crowd of supporters in October that if he really wanted to overcome Joe Biden’s fundraising supremacy, he could call the heads of any major company and they would come to his aid. “All I have to do is call up the head of every Wall Street firm, head of every major company, the head of every major energy company, ‘Do me a favor, send me $10 million for my campaign.’ Yes, sir,’” Trump told the crowd of supporters in Arizona in October.

However, new Federal Election Commission records, tracking fundraising from Oct. 15 to Nov. 23, show that wealthy GOP financiers largely did not help Trump in the final weeks of the bruising battle with Biden as he dropped in the polls or parachute in millions toward his current legal fight.

It’s the latest sign that many executives could be ready to work with President-elect Biden. In the case of the legal fight, some of the leading party donors had previously maxed out to the campaign and Republican National Committee, leaving Trump’s political team unable to turn to them for financial assistance.

The Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee, his two joint fundraising committees and the president’s leadership committee, Save America, raised over $200 million since Election Day. Save America will likely be used to fund any political initiatives Trump is planning after he leaves the White House, including possibly running for president again in 2024. Trump’s fraud pitch, while apparently not moving many business leaders, appears to be resonating with small-dollar donors, who may be convinced that their money is going expressly to the fraud fight, and likely provided much of the money raised in the period.

Steve Schwarzman, the CEO of private equity behemoth Blackstone, and a longtime Trump confidant, did not contribute to any pro-Trump groups in recent weeks, according to election filings. Instead, he gave $15 million in November to the Senate Leadership Fund, a super PAC aligned with Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
As CNBC reported, Schwarzman was one of the many Wall Street executives who walked away from helping Trump in the final stretch of the election. Schwarzman said in late November that, after supporting the president for the past four years, he’s now ready to move on to “help President-elect Biden and his team as they confront the significant challenges of rebuilding our post-Covid economy.”

Since Election Day on Nov. 3, the Trump campaign has initiated dozens of legal fights in states where Biden has been deemed the winner, including in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia. Trump and his allies have lost or withdrawn essentially every court case related to the election, failing to invalidate any votes for Biden.
But Reuters reported last month that large chunks of contributions are, in fact, not going toward efforts to overturn the election results and instead are going to Save America or the Republican National Committee. The fine print on the Trump election defense fund donation page says that “75% of each contribution [goes] first to Save America, up to $5,000,” suggesting that a majority of contributions to the legal matter actually go to Trump’s committee for other purposes.
Trump donor Dan Eberhart told CNBC that many Republican business leaders were not interested in investing in a candidate that had flailing public poll numbers in the final weeks of the election or his next moves in politics. By Election Day, a Real Clear Politics national polling average had Biden up by seven points.

“Only the crazies still believe,” Eberhart told CNBC when discussing who is still giving to Trump. “This is grassroots, true believers,” he added.
Of the top Republican big-money donors that, combined, gave over $500 million throughout the 2020 election cycle to Trump and other GOP campaigns, only a handful gave to entities supporting the commander-in-chief over the six-week period from mid-October to late November.

Those few Republican megadonors that did spend heavily for the president in the final weeks of the election include casino magnates Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, who contributed a combined $15 million to the pro-Trump PAC Preserve America. Bernard Marcus, a co-founder of Home Depot, gave a $5 million contribution to the same PAC. That PAC is currently not involved with the president’s legal battle, and records show that those big donations came in the final two weeks of October.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/04/trump-g ... laims.html
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest