Page 1 of 1

Arizona Supreme Court hands major pro-discrimination decision to anti-gay Christian conservatives

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 2:24 pm
by TrueTexan
The suit was a pre-emptive strike against LGBTQ people.
The Arizona Supreme Court has just ruled in favor of a calligraphy and wedding invitation company whose owners claim their religion forbids them to sell to same-sex couples. Brush & Nib Studio owners Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski are represented by Alliance Defending Freedom. ADF also wrote their business operating agreement, according to ABC 10, before filing the lawsuit on the couple’s behalf.

The court ruled 4-3 that the City of Phoenix “cannot apply its Human Relations Ordinance … to force Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski … to create custom wedding invitations celebrating same-sex wedding ceremonies in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs.”

This is a narrow ruling in that the court noted that its decision applies only to wedding invitations.

“We do not recognize a blanket exemption from the Ordinance for all of Plaintiffs’ business operations.”

“Duka and Koski’s beliefs about same-sex marriage may seem old-fashioned, or even offensive to some. But the guarantees of free speech and freedom of religion are not only for those who are deemed sufficiently enlightened, advanced, or progressive. They are for everyone. After all, while our own ideas may be popular today, they may not be tomorrow,” the court added.

At issue is the City of Phoenix’s six-year old anti-discrimination ordinance, which ADF attacked in court.

The lawsuit was first filed in 2016. The Duka and Koski are not suing because they have been accused of discrimination. They are preemptively suing for the “right” to reject lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender customers. The business owners lost a 2017 judgment and appealed in 2018.

The Southern Poverty Law Center includes the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) on its list of anti-gay hate groups. SPLC in 2017 reported Brush & Nib is also a vendor on Etsy, and “voluntarily and willingly agreed to the vendor terms of service for the site, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”

AZ Central notes that the state’s Supreme Court “has been packed by Gov. Doug Ducey with judges to his liking.” Ducey is a Republican.

Like many local non-discrimination ordinances, Phoenix’s bans discrimination “based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or disability,” AZ Central adds.

Next month the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in three cases of anti-LGBTQ discrimination. Their ruling will have historic effects.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/arizon ... ervatives/

Re: Arizona Supreme Court hands major pro-discrimination decision to anti-gay Christian conservatives

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:36 pm
by YankeeTarheel
The old "lunch counter defense". "I cannot serve Negros because my religious beliefs tell me races must not mix!"

Bullshit the, bullshit now.

Re: Arizona Supreme Court hands major pro-discrimination decision to anti-gay Christian conservatives

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 9:52 pm
by DavidMS
My own faith teaches me that opposing marriage for all is cruel as the companionship in marriage is a partial solution to loneliness. The good news is that decency will win in 20 years due to demographic and social change. However such decisions will cause incredible suffering in the meantime.

Re: Arizona Supreme Court hands major pro-discrimination decision to anti-gay Christian conservatives

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 7:06 pm
by highdesert
This is a narrow ruling in that the court noted that its decision applies only to wedding invitations.
Up to plaintiffs if they want to take it to SCOTUS. The SCOTUS decision in the Masterpiece gay wedding cake case was also a limited win for the religionists. A recent case where a CA winery that hosts weddings refused to host a lesbian couple because of the owners religious beliefs. It got into social media and the winery changed their policy but the couple found another venue.