Czech site interview with the UK's Callum Long-Collins on confiscation of his firearms

1
Interview – Callum Long-Collins: A man whose guns were confiscated for committing a thought-crime
The catalyst to the removal of my firearms was a false allegation of assault, whilst there was no evidence of the assault and all charges were dropped it allowed the police to investigate further into my suitability to own firearms. Due to the opinions I had shared on EnglishShooting they felt that removing my certificates and firearms was in the interest of public safety.
I appealed the revocation in Magistrates Court. This is a panel made up of a judge and 2 magistrates that hears both sides and will decide the outcome between themselves, so no jury.

They upheld the revocation due to “my unwillingness to accept that my views were anything but mainstream and reasonable”. It was felt that I was trying to incite vigilantism amongst firearms owners and had taken my words out of context.

Re: Czech site interview with the UK's Callum Long-Collins on confiscation of his firearms

2
Magistrate's courts are the lowest rung of the English judicial system, basically they are non-lawyers who deal with most minor offenses. He should have appealed to a circuit or crown court but that would take a barrister or solicitor to represent him and if funds are an issue he's screwed. Firearms are not a right so each regional constabulary has discretion and it can be arbitrary.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest