Re: Ask a conservative

26
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:58 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:54 pm OK, here's a question: what's you're stance on LGBT rights? For my part I am a liberal gun owner precisely because I want *all* of my rights and not just some of them. The Democrats offer to protect some rights and take away others. The Republicans do they same, but they generally reverse the lists of what to protect and what to take away.
Could care less one way or the other. What consenting adults do is their own business and it's not my place to judge others. Everyone should be treated with dignity.

I honestly think many younger conservatives are more open to gay rights than you would expect.

You live your life how you want, let me live my life how I want
:)

A pleasant response. Thank you! I wish more conservatives felt that way.
109+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Ask a conservative

27
Bardo wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:57 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:55 pm
Bardo wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:48 pm Underatanding, at least intuitively, that time is linear and all things change why would you associate yourself with what is by definition a fundementally losing notion such as conservatism? Given this realization do you see how conservatism itself is a mental disorder not a choerent, rational political stance?
Calling conservatism a mental disorder is not helpful or even correct. It is natural for humans to want to avoid change, because fear of change is built in to our pysches. It is only through reason that we come to accept change as good.
In other words an irrational, emotion based, psychological shortcoming.....better known as a mental disorder

Rationally, policy should be argued on merit not on 'its different so nay'
By your way of thinking, most every human being has a mental disorder, and so I'd say your definition of "mental disorder" is not meaningful or useful.
109+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Ask a conservative

28
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:58 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:54 pm OK, here's a question: what's you're stance on LGBT rights? For my part I am a liberal gun owner precisely because I want *all* of my rights and not just some of them. The Democrats offer to protect some rights and take away others. The Republicans do they same, but they generally reverse the lists of what to protect and what to take away.
Could care less one way or the other. What consenting adults do is their own business and it's not my place to judge others. Everyone should be treated with dignity.

I honestly think many younger conservatives are more open to gay rights than you would expect.

You live your life how you want, let me live my life how I want
Living is one thing, but what about things like marriage, hospital visitation rights, and the ability to be treated fairly by businesses?

Re: Ask a conservative

29
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:26 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:58 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:54 pm OK, here's a question: what's you're stance on LGBT rights? For my part I am a liberal gun owner precisely because I want *all* of my rights and not just some of them. The Democrats offer to protect some rights and take away others. The Republicans do they same, but they generally reverse the lists of what to protect and what to take away.
Could care less one way or the other. What consenting adults do is their own business and it's not my place to judge others. Everyone should be treated with dignity.

I honestly think many younger conservatives are more open to gay rights than you would expect.

You live your life how you want, let me live my life how I want
:)

A pleasant response. Thank you! I wish more conservatives felt that way.
You'd be surprised the amount of conservatives that think that way. Many conservatives think exactly like that but have to choose one party since it fits them better just like the majority of people here love guns but have to choose the other party because it fits them better.

I would think if you somehow got an honest poll about the LGBT issue, many people who vote Republican would surprise you.

It's a serious problem we are facing in having to choose one or the other. I really wish the libertarian party would pick up steam. It actually represents lots of issues from both parties.

Re: Ask a conservative

30
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:34 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:58 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:54 pm OK, here's a question: what's you're stance on LGBT rights? For my part I am a liberal gun owner precisely because I want *all* of my rights and not just some of them. The Democrats offer to protect some rights and take away others. The Republicans do they same, but they generally reverse the lists of what to protect and what to take away.
Could care less one way or the other. What consenting adults do is their own business and it's not my place to judge others. Everyone should be treated with dignity.

I honestly think many younger conservatives are more open to gay rights than you would expect.

You live your life how you want, let me live my life how I want
Living is one thing, but what about things like marriage, hospital visitation rights, and the ability to be treated fairly by businesses?
To go even further, why does marriage even have to be an issue. A friend, girlfriend or boyfriend should have those same rights. That's discrimination against unmarried people. If I want my straight, male best friend who lives with me to visit me in the hospital or get medical benefits from my job, I should be able to do that.

I don't think marriage should be a qualifier for any of those things. It should be a household issue.

Re: Ask a conservative

31
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:14 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:52 pm
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:48 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:37 pm
Aside from quote tags, our first problem is that you think that the Democratic party is liberal or progressive. That's a common misconception, and it's one that's echoed in right-wing pro-gun echo chambers. Another is your choice to use the 'Democrat' label rather than the name of the Democratic party. The 'Democrat' politician label is pejorative coined by right-wingers to slur their enemies.

What would you say if I told you that in the 2016 election that President Trump was the leftist and that Secretary Clinton was the more conservative choice?

On some issues you would be correct. Hillary is definitely more hawkish / neo con

The single biggest divide was Hillary is a big government globalist while trump is a nationalist. That's why he received so much support from blue collar democrats.
I appreciate your answer. I disagree with your assessment that President Trump received so much support from blue-collar Democrats because he's a nationalist (but maybe some of the votes from Caucasian blue-collar folk was), but we can save that for later.

The folks that run this project work from the totality of what a politician does, not what they say in rallies.

Image

https://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2016

So - the first problem with the beliefs of pro-gun Republican/Libertarian folk is their insistence that Democratic = liberal or leftist. Today's Democratic party is neither, just as today's Republican party is not the one that existed in the 1960s and early 1970s when they were actually 'conservatives' (as in the root: conservation).

What do you think?


I've taken the political compass quiz and I end up in the bottom right quadrant. Maybe a little left of Gary Johnson. But that test isn't perfect. I recognize that no one platform will perfectly align with personal viewpoints.

I certainly agree that both major party's have changed since the 1960s I attribute that change to an over abundant influence of special interests.

What I meant earlier about the blue collar dems, was that trump received more crossover support from them than did other recent republican (bush, mccain, Romney etc) and I would attribute it to his strong nationalist platform that appealed to them.

Re: Ask a conservative

32
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:34 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:58 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:54 pm OK, here's a question: what's you're stance on LGBT rights? For my part I am a liberal gun owner precisely because I want *all* of my rights and not just some of them. The Democrats offer to protect some rights and take away others. The Republicans do they same, but they generally reverse the lists of what to protect and what to take away.
Could care less one way or the other. What consenting adults do is their own business and it's not my place to judge others. Everyone should be treated with dignity.

I honestly think many younger conservatives are more open to gay rights than you would expect.

You live your life how you want, let me live my life how I want
Living is one thing, but what about things like marriage, hospital visitation rights, and the ability to be treated fairly by businesses?
Be treated just the same as anyone else.

Re: Ask a conservative

33
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:58 pm
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:34 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:58 pm
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:54 pm OK, here's a question: what's you're stance on LGBT rights? For my part I am a liberal gun owner precisely because I want *all* of my rights and not just some of them. The Democrats offer to protect some rights and take away others. The Republicans do they same, but they generally reverse the lists of what to protect and what to take away.
Could care less one way or the other. What consenting adults do is their own business and it's not my place to judge others. Everyone should be treated with dignity.

I honestly think many younger conservatives are more open to gay rights than you would expect.

You live your life how you want, let me live my life how I want
Living is one thing, but what about things like marriage, hospital visitation rights, and the ability to be treated fairly by businesses?
Be treated just the same as anyone else.
That can mean different things to different people, so lets get specific. Do you think the states should have the ability to define marriage as one man and one woman?
109+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Ask a conservative

35
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:51 pm
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:14 pm
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:52 pm
AndyH wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:48 pm
Aside from quote tags, our first problem is that you think that the Democratic party is liberal or progressive. That's a common misconception, and it's one that's echoed in right-wing pro-gun echo chambers. Another is your choice to use the 'Democrat' label rather than the name of the Democratic party. The 'Democrat' politician label is pejorative coined by right-wingers to slur their enemies.

What would you say if I told you that in the 2016 election that President Trump was the leftist and that Secretary Clinton was the more conservative choice?

On some issues you would be correct. Hillary is definitely more hawkish / neo con

The single biggest divide was Hillary is a big government globalist while trump is a nationalist. That's why he received so much support from blue collar democrats.
I appreciate your answer. I disagree with your assessment that President Trump received so much support from blue-collar Democrats because he's a nationalist (but maybe some of the votes from Caucasian blue-collar folk was), but we can save that for later.

The folks that run this project work from the totality of what a politician does, not what they say in rallies.

Image

https://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2016

So - the first problem with the beliefs of pro-gun Republican/Libertarian folk is their insistence that Democratic = liberal or leftist. Today's Democratic party is neither, just as today's Republican party is not the one that existed in the 1960s and early 1970s when they were actually 'conservatives' (as in the root: conservation).

What do you think?


I've taken the political compass quiz and I end up in the bottom right quadrant. Maybe a little left of Gary Johnson. But that test isn't perfect. I recognize that no one platform will perfectly align with personal viewpoints.

I certainly agree that both major party's have changed since the 1960s I attribute that change to an over abundant influence of special interests.

What I meant earlier about the blue collar dems, was that trump received more crossover support from them than did other recent republican (bush, mccain, Romney etc) and I would attribute it to his strong nationalist platform that appealed to them.
I heard you about the cross-over, but I think you're missing two important factors: Most of the crossover was from WHITE voters. From a left perspective, Secretary Clinton was a HORRIBLE candidate, the Democratic party ran a corrupt election, true progressives favored Senator Sanders and we know what the Dem organization did there. In other words, I'd suggest that nationalism was less of a factor in Trump's non-majority win than the white nationalist wing of the Republican party might want to admit.

ETA... I'm a tick up/right from Jill Stein. Congrats - we're both libertarians! :beer2:
Last edited by AndyH on Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Ask a conservative

36
willjr75 wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:35 pm No.States shouldn't even define marriage. It should be a household issue. Marriage shouldn't even be a requirement for services.
In the real world it has to be much more than a 'household' issue for two reasons: 1. marriage and civil unions are state (state and federal) functions and 2. there's a vocal minority that are working hard to make sure minorities (from LGBTQ to 'race' to religion) are not allowed to be treated equally.

Re: Ask a conservative

37
My problems with Conservatives are simply that most are not at all conservative, nor do they fit the definition of what, say, a Buckley Conservative might be.(I'm not even sure he was really a Conservative...but I won't get into that).

Mostly I despise that someone, like a Dinesh D'Souza or an Ann Coulter or Trump throws out something that's down-right slanderous and so patently false, and then gets picked up by the so-called "conservatives" and is taken as gospel.

Somewhere up in this thread one of our new "conservatives" said that he found some Democrats who are patriots. You see? That's pure and utter BULLSHIT! I do not know one Democrat, one Liberal, or one Progressive who doesn't love America with all of their heart, not one. But what they DO do is feel that they MUST criticize the shortcomings, both in lack of compassion for our fellow citizens, and for violations of the Constitution.

Just today, the President is out there saying Democrats want illegal immigrants to pour across the border and immediately register and vote for Democrats.
He said Democrats want to raise YOUR taxes (the ordinary people) , want to destroy our economy, take your jobs and give them to foreigners.
He went on to say that because of the Democrats, the immigration question cannot be settled, and if they would just come to the table it would all be cleared up in an hour.

Every single word of that is factually exactly the opposite of the truth. In fact, it's flat-out lies, yet every person in the place cheered him on!

1) NOBODY wants illegal immigrants to pour across the border unchecked. But we have LAWS that allow people at the border to apply for asylum, laws that are being ignored, and we want them followed instead.
2) NOBODY wants new immigrants to immediately vote, nor is anyone proposing repealing the laws that say first an immigrant must be able to get a Green Card, then must live and work here for at LEAST 5 years before they can even APPLY for citizenship. And NOBODY is advocating allowing non-citizens the right to vote. Not in the DemocratIC Party, the Republican Party, or in ANY nation on Earth--a Trumpian blatant lie, yet believed.
3) Democrats don't want to raise ordinary people's taxes, they want to hold them constant or lower but opposed the trillion dollar tax cut that went to the top 1% (and most of THAT to the top 0.1%) and corporations. And, like it or not, Trump HAS raised everyone's taxes regressively because who do you think pays those duties on now-more expensive goods? WE DO! Until 1913, that's how the Federal government raised money--tariffs and duties that raised the price of good to ordinary people.
4) Democrats don't want to destroy the economy--Republicans nearly did between 1995 and 2009. Remember the bailouts of 2008? And the hemorrhaging of jobs by the economy? Oh, and the $1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? All that was the result of Republican policies. Obama fought to reverse that and did. And under Clinton the WORST quarter America had was still better than the BEST quarter America had under Bush--you can look it up.
5) Take your jobs and give them to foreigners? We can't even FILL all the jobs now because unemployment is so low. We are technically at full employment (there are technical reasons why SOME unemployment is needed as people move from job to job). Besides, it was Reagan who began the process of shipping jobs offshore back in 2001--to undermine the unions.
6) Since the Republican hold both the House and the Senate, and have no problem setting aside the filibuster rule and every other Senate "courtesy" rule, the Democrats simply do not have the power stop ANY action that Trump, McConnell and Ryan agree on. If it fails, it is TOTALLY because neither can control their caucus enough to get it done.

These are all factually demonstrable events, yet Trump's lying and Republicans' belief in them is MY issue with Conservatives.

If Democrats say water is wet and Republicans say no it's not, and we have "alternative facts" to prove it, there is NO basis for discussion, for debate, for bi-partisanship, or for compromise.

Remember: The idea that one side shouldn't compromise starts with Newt Gingrich, first as a back-bencher in the minority, then as Speaker. Hastert went further and wouldn't advance ANY legislation that didn't get a majority of the majority, even when there were EASILY enough votes for a solid bi-partisan majority. Boehner would advocate a policy, as would McConnell, but as soon as Obama endorsed it and the rank & file shrieked that Obama couldn't be given a "victory" both would then oppose the policy.

Modern-day obstruction was invented and implemented by Republicans, SOLELY to achieve power.

That's why I'm not a Republican, not a "Conservative", and despite being Progressive and a gun-owner, have real sympathy for TRUE Conservatives like George Will, Bill Kristol, Joe Scarborough, Christine Todd Whitman, Steve Schmidt, and others like them.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Ask a conservative

41
No, im speaking of dennis hastert who had been black mailed for decades and when caught by the FBI admitted under oath to sexually molesting multiple children of the same sex.

Ya know....the darned reality thing v CONservative gossip
Last edited by Bardo on Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Ask a conservative

42
ANYONE who abuses children is not fit to be a member of society. Period.

It's even worse for a person in power or authority to abuse that.

That goes for politicians of any party, teachers, priests, scout leaders, coaches, etc..

I don't care who the person is if they are a child sex predator at the very least they need to spend serious time in prison.
Last edited by koolaidblue on Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Ask a conservative

43
Bardo wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:22 pm No, im speaking of dennis hastert who had been black mailed for decades and when caught by the FBI admitted under oath to sexually molesting multiple children of the same sex.

Ya know....the darned reality thing v CONservative gossip
And he's also a scumbag like many others who should be locked up.


Unfortunately it seems that there are 2 standards in this country. Us common folk, and, powerful politicians. Definitely not equal standards.

Politicians should be held to higher standards but they routinely get away with things we would not.

Re: Ask a conservative

45
YT, good comment. As for the little chart, I’m consistently in the lower left quadrant left of Jill, much more left.

On the OP, why is hard for conservatives grasp that the bill of rights including the second are liberal constructs rather than conservative? The founders didn’t just decide to set a group of liberal concepts and a conservative one thrown in. The conservative position was with the crown and most likely those conservatives of the day had no problem trying to disarm the liberal rabble that wanted to reform. As a liberal, I believe in expanding rights and not restricting them, expanding for everyone. There seems to be a failure among some conservatives to recognize the difference between liberal and authoritarian. A true liberal is not going to be an authoritarian. I fail to see the rational among conservatives to label, Pelosi, Feinstein or even Clinton’s as liberals. They are in the authoritarian group just like Trump and a bunch of other republicans. Why does it seem that conservatives want to label these corporatists (neo-liberals at best) as liberals? Ultimately I suspect because they play for the same team, the corporations.
Image
Image

"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated!" Loquacious of many. Texas Chapter Chief Cat Herder.

Re: Ask a conservative

46
sikacz wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:33 pm YT, good comment. As for the little chart, I’m consistently in the lower left quadrant left of Jill, much more left.

On the OP, why is hard for conservatives grasp that the bill of rights including the second are liberal constructs rather than conservative? The founders didn’t just decide to set a group of liberal concepts and a conservative one thrown in. The conservative position was with the crown and most likely those conservatives of the day had no problem trying to disarm the liberal rabble that wanted to reform. As a liberal, I believe in expanding rights and not restricting them, expanding for everyone. There seems to be a failure among some conservatives to recognize the difference between liberal and authoritarian. A true liberal is not going to be an authoritarian. I fail to see the rational among conservatives to label, Pelosi, Feinstein or even Clinton’s as liberals. They are in the authoritarian group just like Trump and a bunch of other republicans. Why does it seem that conservatives want to label these corporatists (neo-liberals at best) as liberals? Ultimately I suspect because they play for the same team, the corporations.
Damn, Juha. Why do you have to be so reasonable? That really sours my caramel corn. :tongue:
Cynistoicureanism: The world view best expressed by "I can't trust 'em any farther then I can throw 'em, There's nothing I can do about it anyway, So let's have a drink".

Re: Ask a conservative

47
sikacz wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:33 pm YT, good comment. As for the little chart, I’m consistently in the lower left quadrant left of Jill, much more left.

On the OP, why is hard for conservatives grasp that the bill of rights including the second are liberal constructs rather than conservative? The founders didn’t just decide to set a group of liberal concepts and a conservative one thrown in. The conservative position was with the crown and most likely those conservatives of the day had no problem trying to disarm the liberal rabble that wanted to reform. As a liberal, I believe in expanding rights and not restricting them, expanding for everyone. There seems to be a failure among some conservatives to recognize the difference between liberal and authoritarian. A true liberal is not going to be an authoritarian. I fail to see the rational among conservatives to label, Pelosi, Feinstein or even Clinton’s as liberals. They are in the authoritarian group just like Trump and a bunch of other republicans. Why does it seem that conservatives want to label these corporatists (neo-liberals at best) as liberals? Ultimately I suspect because they play for the same team, the corporations.
Based on the time of the bill of rights was drafted compared to the time of the era, they were IMO righteous ideas influenced by libertarian and liberal ideas. I agree with your statement.

In fact I value the constitution so much I hold strong constitutional conservative beliefs where I think our founders were extremely wise to do what they did and it's something that needs to be protected. I value the ideals out into the bill of rights that's why I do not want them changed.

I also agree with you I want as absolutely much personal freedom and limited government interference.

I suspect you have a lot of classical liberal leanings? I often feel that classical liberals and libertarians share a lot of overlapping ideas and values. I think classical liberals, libertarians and constitutional conservatives have more in common than we realize.
:beer2:

Re: Ask a conservative

48
Eris wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:04 pm I wish I could give you a medal for that, YT, but I can't so have a gif instead.

Image
I accept gold bullion coins in lieu of medals! :smart: :laugh: :thumbup: :thanks:

(And yes, I recognize the "Citizen Kane" scene!)
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."

Re: Ask a conservative

49
koolaidblue wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:44 pm
sikacz wrote: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:33 pm YT, good comment. As for the little chart, I’m consistently in the lower left quadrant left of Jill, much more left.

On the OP, why is hard for conservatives grasp that the bill of rights including the second are liberal constructs rather than conservative? The founders didn’t just decide to set a group of liberal concepts and a conservative one thrown in. The conservative position was with the crown and most likely those conservatives of the day had no problem trying to disarm the liberal rabble that wanted to reform. As a liberal, I believe in expanding rights and not restricting them, expanding for everyone. There seems to be a failure among some conservatives to recognize the difference between liberal and authoritarian. A true liberal is not going to be an authoritarian. I fail to see the rational among conservatives to label, Pelosi, Feinstein or even Clinton’s as liberals. They are in the authoritarian group just like Trump and a bunch of other republicans. Why does it seem that conservatives want to label these corporatists (neo-liberals at best) as liberals? Ultimately I suspect because they play for the same team, the corporations.
Based on the time of the bill of rights was drafted compared to the time of the era, they were IMO righteous ideas influenced by libertarian and liberal ideas. I agree with your statement.

In fact I value the constitution so much I hold strong constitutional conservative beliefs where I think our founders were extremely wise to do what they did and it's something that needs to be protected. I value the ideals out into the bill of rights that's why I do not want them changed.

I also agree with you I want as absolutely much personal freedom and limited government interference.

I suspect you have a lot of classical liberal leanings? I often feel that classical liberals and libertarians share a lot of overlapping ideas and values. I think classical liberals, libertarians and constitutional conservatives have more in common than we realize.
:beer2:
I see government as an instrument of the people to perform and advance our common goals. Would it surprise you that I self identify as a liberal green democratic socialist. As I said I’m way left of Jill or Bernie. I would say government has to be big enough to achieve those tasks the people set for it and no bigger. I don’t believe in the elimination or privatization of public services either. That is from my understanding where I differ with right wing type libertarians. Some don’t seem to see a need for government at all. Yes, I take the bill of rights seriously, all of it. So there is that in common and undoubtedly room for dialogue on other areas.
By the way for me that would be a liberal constitutional belief.
Image
Image

"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated!" Loquacious of many. Texas Chapter Chief Cat Herder.

Re: Ask a conservative

50
From a liberal perspective, one can’t advance civil liberties by restricting rights. It’s my firm belief that one can only be truly liberal by embracing the whole bill of rights. There is no such thing as conservatism in the bill of rights unless one believes those rights only belong to the same limited groups that were present at the founding, that would be conservative. The denial of change that is inevitable in an expanding and growing society would also be conservative.
Image
Image

"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated!" Loquacious of many. Texas Chapter Chief Cat Herder.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests