The Liberal Gun Club Forum

A Michigan doctor has been accused of performing genital cutting on two 7-year-old girls at a medical clinic, in a case that federal officials believe to be the first prosecution under a law banning the brutal practice.

The doctor, Jumana Nagarwala, 44, was arrested on Wednesday on charges that she performed the genital cutting at an unnamed medical clinic in Livonia, Mich.; transported minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity; and lied to federal agents.

According to a criminal complaint filed in federal court on Wednesday, Dr. Nagarwala performed the procedure on two girls from Minnesota who traveled to the clinic with their parents in February. The complaint also said that “multiple” other girls, including some from Michigan, may have been victimized between 2005 and 2007.

One of the girls told investigators that she thought she and the other girl had gone to the doctor because “our tummies hurt.” The other said the cutting procedure was so painful that she screamed and could barely walk afterward. She drew a picture of the room where the procedures were allegedly carried out, marking an “X” on the spot where she said she had bled on the examination table, according to the complaint.

“Dr. Nagarwala is alleged to have performed horrifying acts of brutality on the most vulnerable victims,” Kenneth A. Blanco, an acting assistant attorney general with the Justice Department’s criminal division, said in a statement on Thursday. “The Department of Justice is committed to stopping female genital mutilation in this country, and will use the full power of the law to ensure that no girls suffer such physical and emotional abuse.”

Dr. Nagarwala appeared in court on Thursday and was ordered held in jail until another hearing on Monday. The doctor’s lawyer, Shannon M. Smith, could not be reached by phone for comment on Thursday. According to the complaint, Dr. Nagarwala said she had never performed genital cutting on any children.

Dr. Nagarwala, who practices emergency medicine at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, has been placed on administrative leave, said David Olejarz, a spokesman for the Henry Ford Health System.

“The alleged criminal activity did not occur at any Henry Ford facility,” he said in an email. “We would never support or condone anything related to this practice.”

Female genital cutting involves removing parts of the genitalia. The World Health Organization has documented the practice in 30 countries, most of them in Africa. The procedure, which is illegal in the United States, is typically performed on girls before they reach puberty and can lead to infections, childbirth complications or pain during urination or menstruation.

The World Health Organization estimates that worldwide, more than 200 million girls and women alive today have undergone some form of genital cutting. A study last year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that more than a half million women and girls were affected by, or at risk of, genital cutting in the United States in 2012.

Genital cutting has been illegal in the United States since 1996, but that law was amended in 2013 to outlaw what is sometimes referred to as “vacation cutting,” or transporting a girl overseas to carry out the procedure.

The Michigan case is significant because it can help to raise awareness of an issue that often flies under the radar, said Shelby Quast of Equality Now, an international women’s rights advocacy organization.

She said people who might see evidence of genital cutting, such as teachers and health care providers, are not always aware of obligations to report it. “We need better information about exactly where they are,” Ms. Quast said of practitioners of genital cutting. “We know that this is a child abuse issue, and we know that we need to start training our child protection folks better.”

SwampGrouch wrote:But circumcision is tradition so it's okay.

highdesert wrote:FGM is much more than male circumcision.

SwampGrouch wrote:

highdesert wrote:FGM is much more than male circumcision.

Genital mutilation of children is genital mutilation of children, period. Nothing short of demonstrated medical necessity* in the case of a specific individual makes it okay.

*Postulated future health benefits don't count.

SwampGrouch wrote:But circumcision is tradition so it's okay.

Mossberg42MB wrote:Circumcision allegedly enhances sexual pleasure, whereas clitorectomy prevents it. Significant difference there.

SwampGrouch wrote:

Mossberg42MB wrote:Circumcision allegedly enhances sexual pleasure, whereas clitorectomy prevents it. Significant difference there.

On the contrary, male circumcision was not common in the US outside of the Jewish community until the late 19th Century. At that time, British and American doctors began recommending it primarily as a deterrent to masturbation, masturbatory insanity being such a terrible threat to public health and order.

TrueTexan wrote:If the doctor is being charged are the parents being charge with child endangerment or child abuse?

BKinzey wrote:What male who has been circumcised as a child went on to experience pain in performing intercourse as an adult due to the circumcision?

That's the difference.

You can argue they are both wrong but FGM often affects the rest of the woman's sex life.

BKinzey wrote:What male who has been circumcised as a child went on to experience pain in performing intercourse as an adult due to the circumcision?

That's the difference.

You can argue they are both wrong but FGM often affects the rest of the woman's sex life.

BKinzey wrote:All you need do is look up FGM on the internet.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Female+Genital+Mutilation

Bisbee wrote:Watch, the lawyers are going to bring up protections for freedom of religious expression in their defense. With all the anti-abortion cases in play throughout the States, this would be an interesting test case for future decisions on religion and medical procedures.

Mason wrote:The doctor fucked up my circumcision. I remember it being very painful to pee and spending a couple of days in hospital when they "fixed" it. I musta been four- ish. I hadn't stared school. I have visible scars. The general anisthetic giant shot in the ass was a blast for a scared four year old. I remember the horror the second time they put me under, I knew what was coming.

Mikester wrote:

Bisbee wrote:Watch, the lawyers are going to bring up protections for freedom of religious expression in their defense. With all the anti-abortion cases in play throughout the States, this would be an interesting test case for future decisions on religion and medical procedures.

You called it... In the first hearing the Defense Attorney claimed protection under free exercise of religion.

Surprising nobody, this doctor is Muslim and performing the procedure in accordance with her bullshit religion. According to the Defense, this procedure is actually being performed secretly in Mosques across the US, and the clinic was used as an alternative to keep it sterile.

That defense reveals some horrifying behavior that should really be investigated. FGM is absolutely unacceptable and destructive to the sexual health and psychological well-being of women.


However, all the doctor needs to do now is claim "Islamaphobia" and a bunch of misguided people on the far left will rush to the defense of this atrocious act. [emoji14]

Last year, the Journal of Medical Ethics published an article making the case that it's time to revisit the blanket prohibition on female genital mutilation and consider allowing exceptions because the ban is "culturally insensitive" to Muslims, is "supremacist" and some-crazy-how "discriminatory against women."

This appalling argument was made by the type of so-called "progressive" now more frequently referred to as the "regressive left." If you want to know why people talk about "political correctness run amuck," this is why.