The posts on this public forum do not necessarily represent the LGC
https://theliberalgunclub.com/phpBB3/
That's why I don't believe it when people say "There's no chance for Sanders to get the Dem nomination". It's pretty clear that Clinton and allies are taking him seriously as a threat.DispositionMatrix wrote: The Party never wanted him. The DNC and its media surrogates have always been in the tank for Hillary. Now they want Sanders out.
That would throw it into the House of Representatives. You cab bet it would then go to Rubio/Cruz even if they had the lowest vote count.KnightsFan wrote:A four way race between Clinton, Sanders, Rubio/Cruz and Trump would make 2016 very stressful indeed. Especially since I doubt a candidate would win a majority of the electoral college.
Yes, I would be surprised if the Clinton crew orchestrated the "leak".beto wrote:Given the.DNC is a branch of the Clinton campaign and this is the second time a "window" has opened, it might be fishing to get theSanders campaign to bite and this time they did. Bernie scares the hell out of them and threatens to derail the coronation.
If that happened. I'd be very scared. Honestly, it might spark something close to civil war.TrueTexan wrote:That would throw it into the House of Representatives. You cab bet it would then go to Rubio/Cruz even if they had the lowest vote count.KnightsFan wrote:A four way race between Clinton, Sanders, Rubio/Cruz and Trump would make 2016 very stressful indeed. Especially since I doubt a candidate would win a majority of the electoral college.
Clinton/Sanders ticket I would not hesitate to vote for.CDFingers wrote:As long as they stay civil, the debate inside the Democratic Party will be good.
Clinton took the gold ring with "May the Force be with you."
If Sanders does not get the nom, I'll vote Green.
Clinton should select Sanders as her VP. That would take the prize to the max. Hence, the need for civility now.
CDFingers
MSM =Bernie who?lurker wrote:i've been watching for some media discussion of the actual debate, and there's nothing. closest i've seen is yahoo's 12 pics of the candidates, and hillary appears in 11 of them. the media (all of it) is trying to pretend bernie sanders doesn't exist. this is starting to tick me off. there's little or nothing democratic about the "democratic" party.
Him and McKinley were both trust busters. But TR was FAR more progressive for sure.senorgrand wrote:A similar thing happened when TR was sellected as VP...it was meant to keep him under wraps by a party that didn't like him much.
Feel like writing her about her position on the 2nd. Grrrr.Juha --
Welcome, and thank you for being a member of Hillary for America.
I can’t tell you how much it means to me to know that you’re with us. With your support, we’re going to grow this organization even faster and even smarter -- that means building new tools to communicate with supporters and hiring organizers who will knock on doors and make phone calls to earn each and every American’s vote.
Now will you chip in $1 or more to support this work?
This campaign isn’t about me. It’s about everyday Americans -- hard workers, problem solvers, and goal-reachers. Americans deserve a raise, and an economy that puts people first.
You need someone willing to fight for you. I want to be that fighter.
This team is growing every single day, and I’m thrilled for each and every American who joins our campaign. Together, we can work toward the America that we believe in -- where everyone has the opportunity to get ahead and stay ahead.
Again, I want to thank you for your support. Taking this campaign all the way -- and defending ourselves against baseless attacks -- is going to mean everyone chipping in what they can, when they can. If you’re with me, will you donate $1 right now and become an official donor to this campaign?
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/donate/
You’ll hear from the campaign again soon, so keep an eye out for important updates. And thank you again. I’m so glad that you’re here.
Hillary
What's even more my concern since the DNC seems to think lists have owners is that the last contribution I made was during the President's last campaign. And I've only gone to Bernie's campaign and put myself on his mailing list.modernhamlet wrote:Literally NOTHING in that email was substantive or specific to her as a candidate. Barf.
Not to mention the prediction of some pundits of a banner year for third party candidates. The LP and the Greens could conceivably throw monkey wrenches into more than one race.KnightsFan wrote:A four way race between Clinton, Sanders, Rubio/Cruz and Trump would make 2016 very stressful indeed. Especially since I doubt a candidate would win a majority of the electoral college.
When the firewall dropped, the access went BOTH ways. Clinton's people could access Bernie's data just as easily as Bernie's people could access Clinton's.sikacz wrote:What's even more my concern since the DNC seems to think lists have owners is that the last contribution I made was during the President's last campaign. And I've only gone to Bernie's campaign and put myself on his mailing list.modernhamlet wrote:Literally NOTHING in that email was substantive or specific to her as a candidate. Barf.
That was my though too.Wurble wrote:When the firewall dropped, the access went BOTH ways. Clinton's people could access Bernie's data just as easily as Bernie's people could access Clinton's.sikacz wrote:What's even more my concern since the DNC seems to think lists have owners is that the last contribution I made was during the President's last campaign. And I've only gone to Bernie's campaign and put myself on his mailing list.modernhamlet wrote:Literally NOTHING in that email was substantive or specific to her as a candidate. Barf.
Who wants to bet that Clinton's people drained Bernie's entire database and put it on a backup somewhere secret?