Page 1 of 2

HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:37 am
by DispositionMatrix
Author is Josh Sugarmann, who has built his career on gun prohibition and either invented or popularized the nonsense term "assault weapon" now written into law in ban states.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-suga ... 58806.html
Assault weapons, like the two pictured above in a police photo of the weapons used in San Bernardino, are a relatively new addition to our nation's gun larder. Prior to the mid-1980s, revolvers dominated the handgun market and most rifles and shotguns were designed for hunting or sport. Even most law enforcement agencies still relied primarily on revolvers and standard (non-military-style) long guns.

But in the 1980s and 1990s, the gun industry, desperate to lift sagging sales, introduced U.S. gun buyers to assault weapons with detachable high-capacity ammunition magazines. Most of these were semiautomatic versions (firing one bullet per trigger pull) of fully automatic (the weapon will fire as long as the trigger is depressed) military weapons. They quickly became the "must-have" item for a segment of America's gun-owning population: both law-abiding and criminal. Soon, MAC-10 and TEC-9 assault pistols, as well as AR-15, AK-47, UZI and SKS assault rifles were the desired weapons of the drug dealers that drove the crack cocaine market of the late 1980s and early 1990s.

These guns were favored not just for their increased firepower, but their ability to intimidate. The inevitable result of introducing weapons originally designed to inflict as many deaths as possible in as efficient a manner as could be imagined was soon seen. The modern era of mass-casualty public shootings was inaugurated when James Huberty decided to go "hunting for humans" with an UZI Carbine at a McDonald's restaurant in San Ysidro, California on July 18, 1984.
Archived link:
https://archive.is/hYyrC

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:39 am
by KnightsFan
weapons originally designed to inflict as many deaths as possible in as efficient a manner as could be
But doesn't that describe every firearm ever designed?

Modern sporting rifles are just the latest update. I wonder if there was hand wringing in the 1860s about lever action carbines being tools of death not needed for civilian hunters?

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:43 am
by Inquisitor
KnightsFan wrote:
weapons originally designed to inflict as many deaths as possible in as efficient a manner as could be
But doesn't that describe every firearm ever designed?

Modern sporting rifles are just the latest update. I wonder if there was hand wringing in the 1860s about lever action carbines being tools of death not needed for civilian hunters?
There were capacity arguments, but if I recall, centered around ammunition waste. The American Rifle, a Biography is a good read.

http://www.amazon.com/American-Rifle-Bi ... 0553384384

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:52 am
by KnightsFan
I'll have to check that out, sounds interesting.

Also isn't that the same argument they made against fully-automatic infantry rifles?

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:54 am
by beaurrr
Huffy Post and Salon have out-Foxed Fox.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:08 pm
by workinstiff
My SKS is an "assault rifle"? Actually, not even by the author's description.

And I always know who the drug dealers area 'cause they are the dudes down by the corner with AK 47s. :roll:

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:47 pm
by Merkwuerdigliebe
I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:14 pm
by begemot
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.
I've lived in the DC metro area for 22 years and worked in three different DC neighborhoods for a third of that time, including Anacostia. I've never once heard "full auto gunfire" coming from anywhere. Most of my friends live in DC and they haven't either.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:26 pm
by CDFingers
If the case for banning "assault weapons" were strong, we would have seen an increase in "assault weapon" crimes when the Federal AW ban did its sunset. We didn't, so it's not.

CDFingers

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:56 pm
by senorgrand
Actually, homicides went declined faster in the 5 years after the AWB sunset compared to the 5 years prior.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 4:55 pm
by Bacchus
The obsession with banning 'assault' thingies continues to aggravate. I'd just always chalk up AWB talk to politics and noise if it didn't suck the air out of any conversation about tackling root cause solutions. AWB has no effect on crime and its promoters' resistant to evidence just.... just.... Boy, is it ever irritating.

Makes me grateful there is good whiskey at hand.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:16 pm
by MayhemVI
Ever since this thread came up I've been going back and forth on what I feel is a relevant question: Are we going to set our heads on fire every time we come across an anti-gun blog? On HuffPost no less?

I know how that reads, and I have no problem and never will have of any thread that gets posted. I guess I'm saying, what morning of your life have you ever woken up and considered the possibility that every anti-gunner choked to death on a ham sandwich the night before? Today, tomorrow, 50 years, 226 years from now...when do you think every gun hater will either be eradicated or permanently muzzled (pun not intended)?

These articles/blogs are a predictable as can be as are the replies on this thread. So what have we accomplished here?

Again, I'm not Mr. Thread-Monitor, and I don't want the OP to think I'm throwing rocks at him. But one more "I Hate Guns" article on HuffPost doesn't take me by surprise and it doesn't make me feel threatened to any degree whatsoever.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:18 pm
by DispositionMatrix
Articles/blog posts are presented by me as what, given the sources, could loosely be called information, and usually with little commentary. There should not be any reason to make the leap heads are "on fire."

Also, choosing not to read these threads is effortless.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 3:18 am
by workinstiff
DispositionMatrix wrote:Articles/blog posts are presented by me as what, given the sources, could loosely be called information, and usually with little commentary. There should not be any reason to make the leap heads are "on fire."

Also, choosing not to read these threads is effortless.
It is effortless but don't you sell yourself short. I do read your threads because you are garnering interesting information and I do appreciate what you do. Ya a little crabby tonight (not baiting, honestly) I do appreciate your news feeds.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 3:29 am
by Tedzilla
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.
Most of us in McLean and Great Falls can't afford full auto HK MP5s... If you think you're hearing full auto in SW DC pull your head out and listen again.
Yeah, I lived in parts of DC not as nice as Capital Hill for years...

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 9:26 am
by Inquisitor
workinstiff wrote:
DispositionMatrix wrote:Articles/blog posts are presented by me as what, given the sources, could loosely be called information, and usually with little commentary. There should not be any reason to make the leap heads are "on fire."

Also, choosing not to read these threads is effortless.
It is effortless but don't you sell yourself short. I do read your threads because you are garnering interesting information and I do appreciate what you do. Ya a little crabby tonight (not baiting, honestly) I do appreciate your news feeds.
Our very own Eeyore RSS feed.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:03 am
by CDFingers
I also appreciate the news feeds, but I'd like to more commentary from the various posters.

CDFingers

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:39 am
by Merkwuerdigliebe
begemot wrote:
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.
I've lived in the DC metro area for 22 years and worked in three different DC neighborhoods for a third of that time, including Anacostia. I've never once heard "full auto gunfire" coming from anywhere. Most of my friends live in DC and they haven't either.
By not uncommon I'm talking about two or three times per year. Mostly I will hear rapid semi-auto fire of a whole magazine about once a month. And a random two or three gun shots another two times a month. I'm a notorious night hawk so you might have simply been sleeping. This has almost always been like 1 or 2 am. DC is very quiet at night and the gun fire is hard to miss. It almost all comes from SE.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:09 am
by Merkwuerdigliebe
Tedzilla wrote:
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.
Most of us in McLean and Great Falls can't afford full auto HK MP5s... If you think you're hearing full auto in SW DC pull your head out and listen again.
Yeah, I lived in parts of DC not as nice as Capital Hill for years...
Like I said, I don't know what they are using. Referenced the H&K just as an example of the type of weapon. A MAC-10 and TEC-9 are machine pistols too, so I suppose the reference was unnecessary. I don't think cost is much of an issue for these guys whatever they are using since I have no doubt it is drug related.

If you think Capitol Hill is in SW, it's been awhile for you hasn't it?

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:46 am
by Inquisitor
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:
begemot wrote:
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.
I've lived in the DC metro area for 22 years and worked in three different DC neighborhoods for a third of that time, including Anacostia. I've never once heard "full auto gunfire" coming from anywhere. Most of my friends live in DC and they haven't either.
By not uncommon I'm talking about two or three times per year. Mostly I will hear rapid semi-auto fire of a whole magazine about once a month. And a random two or three gun shots another two times a month. I'm a notorious night hawk so you might have simply been sleeping. This has almost always been like 1 or 2 am. DC is very quiet at night and the gun fire is hard to miss. It almost all comes from SE.

I am pretty damn sure that we would have seen that somewhere in the news, if suddenly actual real "machine guns" were being used, well, anywhere.

You may have heard a gun fight between guys with the same guns, but select fire is really unlikely. I have heard select fire weapons discharged, they are different from almost everything. Not to mention if they have REAL machine guns, those would be worth more than anything that might come from the crimes being perpetrated in suburban DC, and even the crooks know that.

Gonna have to back that up, mon amis.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:54 am
by shinzen
As pointed out, there's a big difference between the full auto fire referred to in your first post and the "rapid semi auto fire" in your second. The first is highly unlikely, and the uneducated may frequently conflate it with the latter, but they are distinctly different. It goes back to one of the root issues that a lot of us have with the coverage in the press in the first place. An AR-15 or MAC 10 is not full auto without substantial and illegal modification.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:10 pm
by wifesbane
I continue to be amazed at all the rhetoric that still ignores the data that "assault rifles", however you want to define that term, used in "mass shootings", ditto, cause a tiny number of injuries/deaths each year compared to the total. 200 of 33000 == why the f--- even bother. More kids (~600) die each year from improper storage / handling. Doesn't anyone care about the children?
:sarcasm:

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:15 pm
by Merkwuerdigliebe
shinzen wrote:As pointed out, there's a big difference between the full auto fire referred to in your first post and the "rapid semi auto fire" in your second. The first is highly unlikely, and the uneducated may frequently conflate it with the latter, but they are distinctly different. It goes back to one of the root issues that a lot of us have with the coverage in the press in the first place. An AR-15 or MAC 10 is not full auto without substantial and illegal modification.
Both firearms have always been illegal in DC so it doesn't really matter if they have illegal modifications. If you read the second message I quantify it -- full auto two or three times a year and rapid fire semi once a month or so. I know the difference and I have personally fired both types.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:28 pm
by Merkwuerdigliebe
Inquisitor wrote:
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:
begemot wrote:
Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:I think the drug dealer reference was more specific to the MAC-10 and TEC-9 which was true. As far as the other weapons I'm not sure what they are using, but it is not uncommon to hear full auto gunfire coming from the rougher sections of DC. Never really wanted to be close enough to determine what they are using but I suspect they are machine pistols of the H&K MP5/7 variety.
I've lived in the DC metro area for 22 years and worked in three different DC neighborhoods for a third of that time, including Anacostia. I've never once heard "full auto gunfire" coming from anywhere. Most of my friends live in DC and they haven't either.
By not uncommon I'm talking about two or three times per year. Mostly I will hear rapid semi-auto fire of a whole magazine about once a month. And a random two or three gun shots another two times a month. I'm a notorious night hawk so you might have simply been sleeping. This has almost always been like 1 or 2 am. DC is very quiet at night and the gun fire is hard to miss. It almost all comes from SE.

I am pretty damn sure that we would have seen that somewhere in the news, if suddenly actual real "machine guns" were being used, well, anywhere.

You may have heard a gun fight between guys with the same guns, but select fire is really unlikely. I have heard select fire weapons discharged, they are different from almost everything. Not to mention if they have REAL machine guns, those would be worth more than anything that might come from the crimes being perpetrated in suburban DC, and even the crooks know that.

Gonna have to back that up, mon amis.
Why would you expect to see it in the news? What is any different between getting sprayed with bullets from semi-auto fire and full auto fire? What, you think gang related violence is only done a certain way? If you want factual evidence, I don't know if the Shot Tracker in DC is following that. But what reason could I possibly have in saying something like that if it wasn't true? There were 39,000 gunshots in the Eastern part of DC between 2006 and 2013 and I would think your friends heard none of them. Me, I'm fairly well bracketed by the hot spots.

Re: HuffPo Blog: "The Case for Banning Assault Weapons"

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:42 pm
by Merkwuerdigliebe
...which brings up a relatively poignant point. I think much of the 2A "mob" (better?) is unawares of what the cities have to deal with when it comes to guns. DC isn't exactly a hotbed of violence -- it's a much bigger problem in the major cities (eg NYC, LA, Chicago, and Atlanta).