The Liberal Gun Club Forum

There's still time to enter to win the rifle signed by four Xtian Dominionist asshats! I can't really say it's "free" since you'll have to at least pay the price of being spammed by Steve King, but that's what extra Yahoo mail accounts are for. If I win, I'll be laminating a picture of Elizabeth Warren over their names. And maybe Emma Goldman's, in honor of Fukshot.

http://www.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/2 ... -kings-gun

edit: I just realized this could be described as a rifle raffle. I didn't think I was that slow.

Buck13 wrote:There's still time to enter to win the rifle signed by four Xtian Dominionist asshats! I can't really say it's "free" since you'll have to at least pay the price of being spammed by Steve King, but that's what extra Yahoo mail accounts are for. If I win, I'll be laminating a picture of Elizabeth Warren over their names. And maybe Emma Goldman's, in honor of Fukshot.

http://www.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/2 ... -kings-gun

edit: I just realized this could be described as a rifle raffle. I didn't think I was that slow.

I entered. If I win I'll have to go back to DC and get Elizabeth Warren to put on an a Elmer Fudd hat and pose with the gun saying she is hunting Wepublicans!

Buck13 wrote:edit: I just realized this could be described as a rifle raffle. I didn't think I was that slow.

As long as the wrong people don't enter. Then it would be a riff-raff rifle raffle rife with roughs.

CDFingers

CDFingers wrote: As long as the wrong people don't enter. Then it would be a riff-raff rifle raffle rife with roughs.

I'm pretty sure I am the wrong people.

Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

DispositionMatrix wrote:Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

Elizabeth Warren is reprehensible filth? That's a bit strong isn't it? I mean, I personally want her to be the next President. But even if you have a problem with her, calling her filth seems a bit off the rails.

Entered - I could totally get those chicken scratches off...

MayhemVI wrote:

DispositionMatrix wrote:Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

Elizabeth Warren is reprehensible filth? That's a bit strong isn't it? I mean, I personally want her to be the next President. But even if you have a problem with her, calling her filth seems a bit off the rails.

I'll have to agree to disagree. While her fawning worshippers outside the MA area are happy to blindly support Warren as some kind of messianic figure, I was here (working in MA) when she was running for office and had a better vantage point. Despite the media desperately trying to run interference for her, she was obviously grotesquely self-serving and obscenely arrogant. MA is an extremely corrupt state and though its pols inspire their die hard bootlickers, being in their presence makes me want to retreat to the nearest decontamination chamber to de-slime.

Upon reflection, I would sell the .30-30 to a GOP fanatic willing to pay far more than it's worth.

I like warren. Better than Scott Brown. Not sure I am a boot licker, though.

I am sure you think I am lots of things I am not though.

It'd cost about $10 in Goo-gone, sandpaper, and wood finish to obliterate the offensiveness and make that a fine rifle for your collection.

DispositionMatrix wrote:obscenely arrogant.

Not always a bad thing. I think you'd have to be pretty damned arrogant to enjoy calling people out like she does in some of those hearings.

Upon reflection, I would sell the .30-30 to a GOP fanatic willing to pay far more than it's worth.

Might be worth a try.

I'd do the defacing of the signatures publicly as a publicity stunt for liberal gun owners, but I don't want my name in the papers.

MayhemVI wrote:

DispositionMatrix wrote:Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

Elizabeth Warren is reprehensible filth? That's a bit strong isn't it? I mean, I personally want her to be the next President. But even if you have a problem with her, calling her filth seems a bit off the rails.

It's pretty mild compared to what many members of this forum call conservatives.

FiremanBob wrote:

MayhemVI wrote:

DispositionMatrix wrote:Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

Elizabeth Warren is reprehensible filth? That's a bit strong isn't it? I mean, I personally want her to be the next President. But even if you have a problem with her, calling her filth seems a bit off the rails.

It's pretty mild compared to what many members of this forum call conservatives.

Well, it's going to be pretty mild to what I call them if I keep asking them questions and they keep frittering off without answering them.

http://www.theliberalgunclub.com/phpBB3 ... =1&t=34625

DispositionMatrix wrote:

MayhemVI wrote:

DispositionMatrix wrote:Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

Elizabeth Warren is reprehensible filth? That's a bit strong isn't it? I mean, I personally want her to be the next President. But even if you have a problem with her, calling her filth seems a bit off the rails.

I'll have to agree to disagree. While her fawning worshippers outside the MA area are happy to blindly support Warren as some kind of messianic figure, I was here (working in MA) when she was running for office and had a better vantage point. Despite the media desperately trying to run interference for her, she was obviously grotesquely self-serving and obscenely arrogant. MA is an extremely corrupt state and though its pols inspire their die hard bootlickers, being in their presence makes me want to retreat to the nearest decontamination chamber to de-slime.

Upon reflection, I would sell the .30-30 to a GOP fanatic willing to pay far more than it's worth.

Objectify this statement "she was obviously grotesquely self-serving and obscenely arrogant". If it was obvious you should be able to hitch it to specific statements or actions.

To be honest your observations are suspect. Self-aggrandizement would be so out of character for her that I think only a Republican tool would make an observation like that about her actions or record in Washington. And it is so typical of current Republican insanity to discredit and smear anyone defying the K Street big business hatchet men and their payola in an effort to do something for the American public.

Merkwuerdigliebe wrote:

DispositionMatrix wrote:

MayhemVI wrote:

DispositionMatrix wrote:Those signatures would buff right off, and those clowns, like Warren, are reprehensible filth. Decent rifle though.

Elizabeth Warren is reprehensible filth? That's a bit strong isn't it? I mean, I personally want her to be the next President. But even if you have a problem with her, calling her filth seems a bit off the rails.

I'll have to agree to disagree. While her fawning worshippers outside the MA area are happy to blindly support Warren as some kind of messianic figure, I was here (working in MA) when she was running for office and had a better vantage point. Despite the media desperately trying to run interference for her, she was obviously grotesquely self-serving and obscenely arrogant. MA is an extremely corrupt state and though its pols inspire their die hard bootlickers, being in their presence makes me want to retreat to the nearest decontamination chamber to de-slime.

Upon reflection, I would sell the .30-30 to a GOP fanatic willing to pay far more than it's worth.

Objectify this statement "she was obviously grotesquely self-serving and obscenely arrogant". If it was obvious you should be able to hitch it to specific statements or actions.

To be honest your observations are suspect. Self-aggrandizement would be so out of character for her that I think only a Republican tool would make an observation like that about her actions or record in Washington. And it is so typical of current Republican insanity to discredit and smear anyone defying the K Street big business hatchet men and their payola in an effort to do something for the American public.

Dispo was talking about his personal observations of her in MA, before she made it to Washington.

And you are asking for "objectified statements"? You..? Please excuse me while I giggle and snicker...[emoji23]

I would love to win. Not sure if I would buff off the signatures or sell it to some Ted Cruz fanboy.

JimSteel wrote:I would love to win. Not sure if I would buff off the signatures or sell it to some Ted Cruz fanboy.

Maybe sell it and buy a couple of clean ones for the money?