Page 1 of 2

NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:29 am
by TrueTexan
Violation of multiple basic firearm safety rules by a NYPD officer cost an innocent New York man his life.
The victim, Akai Gurley, 28, had spent the evening at his girlfriend’s apartment inside the Louis Pink housing projects, Bratton told reporters at a press conference. The couple left the seventh floor apartment around 11:15 p.m. and tried to take an elevator down to the bottom floor. When the elevator wouldn’t work, they entered the stairwell.

Two officers, meanwhile, were conducting a vertical patrol -- also known as a top to bottom patrol -- inside the building. Upon entering the "dark" stairwell on the eighth floor, Bratton said, Officer Peter Liang drew his gun and flashlight as a safety precaution. That's when Gurley and his girlfriend -- identified by the New York Daily News as Melissa Butler -- also entered the stairwell.

At that moment, Liang fired one round from the eighth floor landing. Gurley, who was on the seventh floor landing, was struck in the chest.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/2 ... f=new-york

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:44 am
by christianne
Why do I feel like the NYPD is the biggest "gang" out there, killing innocent people, at random? I mean, isn't that the definition of mass killers? Instead of spending $50 billion on Moms, Bloomers should have paid for the entire NYPD to receive the best and state of the art firearms training. After all, he was the Mayor of NY. They are mass killers at his direction.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:56 am
by SwampGrouch
I doubt there's any question that Liang fucked up, but how do you conclude a lack of trigger discipline from that article?

If we're going to speculate as to cause, I'd say it was a fundamental shoot-don't shoot judgement failure, it based on failing to discern whether or not the person was a threat.

A staircase is a scary place, especially for an amped up rookie.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:09 pm
by TrueTexan
SwampGrouch wrote:I doubt there's any question that Liang fucked up, but how do you conclude a lack of trigger discipline from that article?

If we're going to speculate as to cause, I'd say it was a fundamental shoot-don't shoot judgement failure, it based on failing to discern whether or not the person was a threat.

A staircase is a scary place, especially for an amped up rookie.
The police commissioner is calling it an accidental discharge.
I would call it a violation of Col. Jeff Coopers rules 2 thru 4

RULE II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY

RULE III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET

RULE IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET

You would not want to run around with finger on trigger. Looks good for TV but not safe in real life. You could stumble in dark stairwell shoot partner.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:20 pm
by SwampGrouch
Bratton said that according to a preliminary investigation, "it appears this may have been an accidental discharge."
Emphasis mine

You cannot discern from the facts presented where Liang's trigger finger was. There is, however, no doubt that he did not correctly identify his target in terms of being a threat.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 1:53 pm
by christianne
http://jimfishertruecrime.blogspot.com/ ... nnual.html

New York City

In 1971, police officers in New York City shot 314 people, killing 93. (In California, the state with the most police involved shootings in 2011, the police shot 183, killing 102.) In 2010, New York City police shot 24, killing 8. Last year, in the nation's largest city, the police shot 16, killing 6. In Columbus, Ohio, a city one eighth the size of New York, the police shot 14, killing 8. Statistical diversities like this suggest that in the cities with the highest per capita shooting rates, better people ought to be hired, or the existing forces need a lot more training in the use of deadly force.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:00 pm
by TrueTexan
SwampGrouch wrote:
Bratton said that according to a preliminary investigation, "it appears this may have been an accidental discharge."
Emphasis mine

You cannot discern from the facts presented where Liang's trigger finger was. There is, however, no doubt that he did not correctly identify his target in terms of being a threat.
I think we know where the trigger finger was, unless the gun was one of those auto firing Glocks that cause Glock Leg. :D

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:08 pm
by SwampGrouch
TrueTexan wrote:I think we know where the trigger finger was, unless the gun was one of those auto firing Glocks that cause Glock Leg. :D
I get the joke, but the fact remains, we cannot tell from the facts presented whether he was indexing prior to "acquiring the target" or not.

(But then, I'm also the fellow, who by temperament and training, will say, "Brown on this side" if you ask me what color the door is.)

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:43 pm
by fknauss
Hey, I read Stranger in a Strange land too!

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:00 pm
by MudPuppy98
I get that it it was possibly unintended, but accidental really doesn't cover situations like this. Negligent is a better term.

A non-LEO citizen would be in jail right now in those circumstances in NYC.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:15 pm
by SailDesign
fknauss wrote:Hey, I read Stranger in a Strange land too!
"Fair Witness" IIRC. :)

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:50 am
by DispositionMatrix
http://ktla.com/2014/11/21/rookie-nypd- ... discharge/
[quote]A rookie police officer shot and killed an unarmed 28-year-old man in an unlit stairwell of a housing project in what New York’s top cop said Friday was “a very unfortunate tragedy … involving an accidental discharge.”[/quote]
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/ ... 1920141121
[quote]"It appears to be an accidental discharge with no intention to strike anybody at this time," Bratton said.[/quote]
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/c ... nocent-man
[quote]Liang’s gun was already drawn from its holster and went off.

“It appears to be an accidental discharge—no intention to strike anybody,” Bratton said.[/quote]
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/nyreg ... .html?_r=0
[quote]Officer Liang and his partner came upon Mr. Gurley and called in the injury on the police radio, saying it was the result of an accidental discharge, the official said.[/quote]
http://nypost.com/2014/11/21/police-fat ... -building/
[quote]Bratton called the “accident” a tragedy and blamed it on the poorly lit stairwell.
“As the officers were entering the eighth-floor landing, the lights were not operable,” he said. “Everything points to accidental discharge.”[/quote]
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow ... story.html
[quote]“It appears to be an accidental discharge, with no intention to strike anybody,” Bratton told reporters.[/quote]

Hard to let the "accidental discharge" falsehood touted by NY Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, Officer Liang, and his partner slide. The account varies by article, but it was either a bad shoot or a negligent discharge (human error), not an "accidental discharge" (mechanical error).

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:56 am
by DispositionMatrix
MudPuppy98 wrote:I get that it it was possibly unintended, but accidental really doesn't cover situations like this. Negligent is a better term.

A non-LEO citizen would be in jail right now in those circumstances in NYC.
And if it had been a non-LEO citizen, there would be no one in authority trying to spin it as an "accidental discharge." The PD would wholeheartedly be claiming it was a negligent discharge.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:30 am
by beto
First New York has a strong anti-gun culture and most of the Police are likely recruited in City. There is a Hollywood gun culture of blasting away at anything. This is what the recruits are exposed to, not responsible gun handling as a child. I would be willing to bet that NYC hate of guns extends to the extent that the officers do not get enough training and practice to use their forearms appropriately. This is speculation but it is based on observations.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:24 pm
by begemot
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/nyreg ... .html?_r=0
Officer Liang is left-handed, and he tried to turn the knob of the door that opens to the stairwell with that hand while also holding the gun, according to a high-ranking police official who was familiar with the investigation and who emphasized that the account could change.

It appears that in turning the knob and pushing the door open, Officer Liang rotated the barrel of the gun down and accidentally fired, the official said. He and the other officer both jumped back into the hallway, and Officer Liang shouted something to the effect that he had accidentally fired his weapon, the official said.
If accurate, an accident. But negligent discharge is more appropriate.
Why do I feel like the NYPD is the biggest "gang" out there, killing innocent people, at random? I mean, isn't that the definition of mass killers? Instead of spending $50 billion on Moms, Bloomers should have paid for the entire NYPD to receive the best and state of the art firearms training. After all, he was the Mayor of NY. They are mass killers at his direction.
Raging hyperbole, IMO. Not helpful.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:56 pm
by nhaP
Who opens a door with the hand holding the gun? If true, he should be fired for gross stupidity.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:04 pm
by SwampGrouch
fknauss wrote:Hey, I read Stranger in a Strange land too!
I read a pretty steady diet of Heinlein in my formative years. Bob knew a thing or two about disciplined thinking.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:14 pm
by SwampGrouch
beto wrote:First New York has a strong anti-gun culture and most of the Police are likely recruited in City. There is a Hollywood gun culture of blasting away at anything. This is what the recruits are exposed to, not responsible gun handling as a child. I would be willing to bet that NYC hate of guns extends to the extent that the officers do not get enough training and practice to use their forearms appropriately. This is speculation but it is based on observations.
Good point.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:05 pm
by rascally
Isn't NYC the place that requires the police weapons to be equipped with a "New York trigger" with a DA pull of 12 lbs or so? How the heck do you get an "accidental" weapon firing with a trigger like that?

If it was like my Walther PPQ with a SAO pull of 4.5 lbs maybe it would be possible. Which is why I keep my finger away from the trigger until I've made the decision to fire.

I think the rookie had a bad case of "thug fever". Similar to the familiar "buck fever" but with vastly worse consequences.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 12:21 pm
by brandonsmash
MudPuppy98 wrote:I get that it it was possibly unintended, but accidental really doesn't cover situations like this. Negligent is a better term.

A non-LEO citizen would be in jail right now in those circumstances in NYC.
Correct. It was not "accidental." At the very least it was manslaughter.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 2:00 pm
by begemot
brandonsmash wrote:
MudPuppy98 wrote:I get that it it was possibly unintended, but accidental really doesn't cover situations like this. Negligent is a better term.

A non-LEO citizen would be in jail right now in those circumstances in NYC.
Correct. It was not "accidental." At the very least it was manslaughter.
If report is accurate, he could be charged with second degree manslaughter in NY.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 2:23 pm
by Kyluckyman
Guns do not simply discharge without a finger pressing against the trigger.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:54 pm
by beto
Kyluckyman wrote:Guns do not simply discharge without a finger pressing against the trigger.
and with a 14 lb trigger pull!!!! My Enfield that has about 1 14 lb pull. Sorry no accident. Look at NYC culture and the fact the gun culture is "cops and thugs' gun culture. The police are not seperate from the culture. Unfortuately in reality the identity of a cop or thug may not be obvious.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:14 am
by eelj
Having been a gun owner since my early teens I find these accidental or negligent shootings almost unbelievable. In my profession there were certain mistakes that would involve certain dismissal with no other recourse or protection from the union. I feel this cop should be fired and never let back, I wouldn't want him for a partner in the future if they might be prone to second guessing because of this incident in a hairy situation.

Re: NYPD shooting no trigger discipline.

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 4:03 pm
by TrueTexan
This has gotten worse. Seems the officer that accidently shot the victim in the stairwell didn't call for emergency help but texted his Union Rep instead. The officers were not supposed to be doing vertical patrols. Had been told not to do them. Did not know the address of the building. This and more all according to NY Daily News.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/bro ... -1.2034219