I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/editorial

1
As an avid shooter, collector, student, and defender of firearms, I view the reaction to recent tragedies with a truly torn heart. Our country is being torn apart by it and we mourn, cry and ask why. I understand the need to fill the void with “DO SOMETHING”! But blaming the inanimate object makes no sense to me. How can you blame the gun, when the gun has always been there?
Since the birth of our nation, guns have been there. They created our nation, protected our homes, put food on the table, and gave every man and woman personal freedom. As they said in the 1870’s “God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal:” Guns were there during civil unrest, during economic disasters, during social upheavals that have turned other countries upside down.
…But there never were the unspeakable horrors that have occurred in the last 15-20 years even though the guns were there.
So what’s changed if the gun has ALWAYS been present?
Many say, blame the technology, blame the modern rifle. The military style magazine fed semi-automatic rifle has been in civilian hands since the early 1950’s. In fact their use by civilians was fostered by President Kennedy during his presidency with his support of the Department of Civilian Marksmanship and its rifle competitions using military arms including civilian versions of the M14 known as the M1A, and the AR15 known as the SP-1. He understood the need for a trained, armed citizenry.
So what’s changed if the gun has ALWAYS been present?
The gun has always been there. So how can you blame the gun? Or worse make criminals of the tens of millions of law abiding gun owners who just want to feels safe, target shoot, or not rely on big business to put food on their table.
I’ll tell you what changed:
It is parents not doing their jobs as parents; be it their fault or not. Propping kids in front of ultra violent movies, TV shows and video games for 8-10 hours at a time with no social interaction, or worse, giving them no attention at all. drugged up on the latest boutique “kid calmer” drug. As the lines between reality and fantasy fade, what is the fantasy we have given them?
It is Hollywood and the acting community taking no responsibility for their portrayal of wanton mass murder. How sickening is it to see an actor calling gun owning citizens the “bad guys” when they just cashed a 30 million dollar check for portraying gun horrors that sicken gun owners. How can I say that? Because gun owners understand and respect the lethal force and responsibility of gun ownership.
It’s the media for only showing the dark side of firearms ownership and not the thousands of citizens that use them to defend their family and property every year.
It is a society that accepts hundreds of scenes of gun violence on television in a given day, but is flabbergasted at the sight of a bare breast.
What do you call endless hours of drug induced subjection to scenes of mass murder, glorifying gunplay and it’s social acceptance, Hollywood glorified and celebrated for their wealth and fame as they portray blood soaked murder, and media flooding you with bias reporting against gun ownership?
I call it brainwashing.
And if you think one more gun law will change our society, I think you’ve been brainwashed, too.

Thanks for reading.
Fearing tomorrow and regretting yesterday makes for a very short ride....Carpe Diem!

Re: I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/edito

4
First half: awesome!

Second half: I think you're too confident in the same old answers that people have been giving for the "decline of society" (or minor variations thereof) for literally hundreds of years. The clarity of your opening should be supported by a better second half. Economics and science are your friend here. Just one suggestion for a well-supported possibility for a contributing factor that I was pointed to the other day. It significantly changed my thinking.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... ine?page=1

Re: I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/edito

5
Fukshot wrote:First half: awesome!

Second half: I think you're too confident in the same old answers that people have been giving for the "decline of society" (or minor variations thereof) for literally hundreds of years. The clarity of your opening should be supported by a better second half. Economics and science are your friend here. Just one suggestion for a well-supported possibility for a contributing factor that I was pointed to the other day. It significantly changed my thinking.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... ine?page=1
What he said. :newhere:

By the way I'm with you. As a sixteen year old militaria and history enthusiast, I can say that my habit of studying history has made me quite cynical, which is now increasin even more.
If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.
George S. Patton

"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary. ” – Karl Marx

Re: I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/edito

9
Fukshot wrote:First half: awesome!

Second half: I think you're too confident in the same old answers that people have been giving for the "decline of society" (or minor variations thereof) for literally hundreds of years. The clarity of your opening should be supported by a better second half. Economics and science are your friend here. Just one suggestion for a well-supported possibility for a contributing factor that I was pointed to the other day. It significantly changed my thinking.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... ine?page=1
The graphs in the MJ article remind me of this one.
uploadfromtaptalk1357519499801.jpg
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired...

-Washington: Art. I, § 24 (enacted 1889)

Re: I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/edito

10
Dandyone wrote:
Fukshot wrote:First half: awesome!

Second half: I think you're too confident in the same old answers that people have been giving for the "decline of society" (or minor variations thereof) for literally hundreds of years. The clarity of your opening should be supported by a better second half. Economics and science are your friend here. Just one suggestion for a well-supported possibility for a contributing factor that I was pointed to the other day. It significantly changed my thinking.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... ine?page=1
The graphs in the MJ article remind me of this one.
uploadfromtaptalk1357519499801.jpg
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
That is a bar graph superimposed on a line graph. The valleys in the bar graph are conveniently ignored by the the eye. If it were two line graphs there would be no discernible correlation. It looks suspiciously like it's from an oil company propaganda pseudo science chain email to me.

This is the wrong forum for that kind of crap.
'Sorry stupid people but there are some definite disadvantages to being stupid."

-John Cleese

Re: I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/edito

11
Fukshot wrote:First half: awesome!

Second half: I think you're too confident in the same old answers that people have been giving for the "decline of society" (or minor variations thereof) for literally hundreds of years. The clarity of your opening should be supported by a better second half. Economics and science are your friend here. Just one suggestion for a well-supported possibility for a contributing factor that I was pointed to the other day. It significantly changed my thinking.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... ine?page=1
I think he did just fine ! It's his opinion............

Re: I need a vote. Should I send this in as an opinion/edito

12
irishman wrote:
Fukshot wrote:First half: awesome!

Second half: I think you're too confident in the same old answers that people have been giving for the "decline of society" (or minor variations thereof) for literally hundreds of years. The clarity of your opening should be supported by a better second half. Economics and science are your friend here. Just one suggestion for a well-supported possibility for a contributing factor that I was pointed to the other day. It significantly changed my thinking.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... ine?page=1
I think he did just fine ! It's his opinion............
I agree. NJgunner came asking for input. I agree with what he said, but I was making suggestions to increase the chance of making more people agree with us. I don't mean to demean what he wrote at all.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest