GuitarsandGuns wrote:The massacre in Newtown is far from Bushmaster's first brush with tragedy. The company's semiautomatic rifles were used in at least four high-profile mass shootings since 1999, including a 2009 rampage that left 10 dead across southern Alabama, and a 2010 shooting spree in Virginia that killed eight people over 19 hours. Most notoriously, a Bushmaster .223 rifle was used by the so-called Beltway snipers, John Allen Muhammed and Lee Boyd Malvo, who murdered 15 people in 2001 and 2002.
I know the Huffington Post is trying to beat up a fever pitch against so-called assault rifles, but what exactly is the point of the above? That Bushmaster sells a lot of guns?
Take the McLendon mass shooting in Alabama. The shooter had a SKS (fixed magazine, by the way) and Bushmaster (no collapsible stock, no bayonet lug, if a quick search is to be believed), along with a shotgun and a .38 revolver. He killed 11 unarmed people, and killed himself at the end of a shootout with police... the first armed folks he encountered during the incident. It's unclear which weapon(s) he used. You could take away both rifles AND the shotgun and this perp is still far better armed than any of his victims, and still able to kill them with ease. The only difference might have been the police shootout's duration... and perhaps he would not have hit the Police Chief in the arm.
Virginia would be the Speight shootings, although the description is inaccurate. As far as I know, the gun he used wasn't ever determined, as he turned himself in unarmed after an 18 hour manhunt. He owned a Colt AR, a Bushmaster AR, and a couple of Norincos, and "other military arms." Obviously, if the Bushmaster magically disappeared, the guy was still a match for eight unarmed victims. The DC snipers stole a Bushmaster. Nothing about that gun made them more or less effective, and like most criminals usiong a stolen gun it's reasonable to assume their reason for that gun was because it was availble.
HuffPo WANTS to imply that if only we could get rid of these Bushmaster and similar "assault rifles" then these tragedies would not have happened. That's completely illogical. As always, it's the person. If not the Bushmaster, another gun. If not a gun, a car, or propane tank, or rat poison, or fertilizer.