Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

9
Jokes aside, I'm not sure indecent exposure or lewd behavior or whatever is enough of a threat to justify the counter threat of deadly force. Unpleasant? Yes. In fear? Quite possibly. In fear for life or limb? I don't think so.

I don't mean to minimize the unpleasantness for the victim. I don't mean (even a tiny bit) to apologize for this creep's behavior. I just question if this rises to an adequate threat to pull a gun on someone, as the event is described in the article. I like to think I would have confronted verbally before elevating the situation.

Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

10
Fukshot wrote:Jokes aside, I'm not sure indecent exposure or lewd behavior or whatever is enough of a threat to justify the counter threat of deadly force. Unpleasant? Yes. In fear? Quite possibly. In fear for life or limb? I don't think so.

I don't mean to minimize the unpleasantness for the victim. I don't mean (even a tiny bit) to apologize for this creep's behavior. I just question if this rises to an adequate threat to pull a gun on someone, as the event is described in the article. I like to think I would have confronted verbally before elevating the situation.
I agree with you on this one. If all he was doing was flashing, there is no threat to your life there.

Pointing and laughing while calling 911 would probably have gotten the job done.
-+-+-+-+
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space. Everything else is just opinion." -Democritus 
-+-+-+-+-
Come check out my custom 1911 grips and other wooden items at my Etsy store.

Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

13
Ultravox wrote:
Fukshot wrote:Jokes aside, I'm not sure indecent exposure or lewd behavior or whatever is enough of a threat to justify the counter threat of deadly force. Unpleasant? Yes. In fear? Quite possibly. In fear for life or limb? I don't think so.

I don't mean to minimize the unpleasantness for the victim. I don't mean (even a tiny bit) to apologize for this creep's behavior. I just question if this rises to an adequate threat to pull a gun on someone, as the event is described in the article. I like to think I would have confronted verbally before elevating the situation.
I agree with you on this one. If all he was doing was flashing, there is no threat to your life there.

Pointing and laughing while calling 911 would probably have gotten the job done.
Yes.
"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times"
"Namaste"
"Don't Tread on Me"

Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

14
Ultravox wrote:
Fukshot wrote:Jokes aside, I'm not sure indecent exposure or lewd behavior or whatever is enough of a threat to justify the counter threat of deadly force. Unpleasant? Yes. In fear? Quite possibly. In fear for life or limb? I don't think so.

I don't mean to minimize the unpleasantness for the victim. I don't mean (even a tiny bit) to apologize for this creep's behavior. I just question if this rises to an adequate threat to pull a gun on someone, as the event is described in the article. I like to think I would have confronted verbally before elevating the situation.
I agree with you on this one. If all he was doing was flashing, there is no threat to your life there.

Pointing and laughing while calling 911 would probably have gotten the job done.
Image


No gun for me. Especially one carried so stupidly.
How to Embed a Youtube Video - click here
If you live a long life, it is a testament to your friends' self control.
Join The LGC

Thread Killer

Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

15
Baikal49 wrote:
Fukshot wrote:Well, he was masturbating and told her she was welcome to watch. I would find that threatening, but not pull a gun and send the dogs after him threatening.
Welcome to watch without more is not deadly force responsive. Its just can invite you can reject, right?
:D
I'd say it is more than an invite that can be rejected. Presenting his genitals and stroking them before making the invite also crosses the line of consent and is something quite serious ethically and in the eyes of the law. That don't make it worthy of a bullet in the head (in the eyes of the law) and that seems to me the standard for drawing and aiming.

Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

17
ya know, something about this just isn't passing the smell test.

"Just had a 'feeling'" Had time to load the weapon and chamber a round in while turning her child's head away? Commanded the dog to give chase and actually corner the perv only to let him go? First the perv is sitting and asks her to approach, later in the story he approaches her aggressively...like she hung around a while?

if this thing really happened, these two incompetents were made for each other.
People want leadership, and in the absence of genuine leadership they'll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone.”Aaron Sorkin/Michael J Fox The American President
Subliterate Buffooery of the right...
Literate Ignorance of the left...

Re: Woman pulls gun on flasher

21
I always heard "throw it back" was the appropriate response to a flasher.

If she felt that he was going to sexually assault her, then of course the gun should make an appearance, but short of physical harm, it would seem like an unequal counter of force to the infraction. Which, in turn, justifies stringent and difficult-to-overcome requirements to getting a ccw permit.

Then again, I didn't see his junk, so maybe she had something to be seriously afraid of, besides losing her lunch.
"Smell the hot rain on the street; it could be love, it could be alcohol."

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests