Page 1 of 1

I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 3:47 pm
by SamuraiCowboy
I no longer wish to be associated with right wing political action committees who no longer care about Second Amendment rights. Fox News reported the the NRA is backing the contemp vote for Holder.
I charge both GOA and the NRA with funding the Fast and Furious witch hunt without ever bringing up Operation Wide Reciever and never questioning former AG Mulkasy.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 3:48 pm
by ErikO
:welcome: back. :)

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:14 pm
by hagagaga
GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:25 pm
by Fukshot
hagagaga wrote:GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.
Yes. That's the reason given. Do you actually believe that's the motivation for going after Holder?

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:34 pm
by hagagaga
Fukshot wrote:
hagagaga wrote:GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.
Yes. That's the reason given. Do you actually believe that's the motivation for going after Holder?
For a significant portion, I'm sure it is.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:37 pm
by KVoimakas
Fukshot wrote:
hagagaga wrote:GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.
Yes. That's the reason given. Do you actually believe that's the motivation for going after Holder?
Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:42 pm
by Fukshot
KVoimakas wrote:Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.
Wasn't arguing that point. I don't like him one bit.

Not sure where I am on the balance between the evil that is Holder and the evil that is letting the douchebags in congress score points on this shit.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:00 pm
by ErikO
Fukshot wrote:
KVoimakas wrote:Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.
Wasn't arguing that point. I don't like him one bit.

Not sure where I am on the balance between the evil that is Holder and the evil that is letting the douchebags in congress score points on this shit.
In a war between douchebags and asshats, the bystanders are the only ones that loose.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:11 pm
by Progurt
It's a great opportunity to be pissed off at the asshats on both sides.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:49 pm
by Wurble
ErikO wrote:
Fukshot wrote:
KVoimakas wrote:Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.
Wasn't arguing that point. I don't like him one bit.

Not sure where I am on the balance between the evil that is Holder and the evil that is letting the douchebags in congress score points on this shit.
In a war between douchebags and asshats, the bystanders are the only ones that loose.
LOSE. LOSE.

GAAAAAAH!

There's nothing "loose" about the bystanders damnit! :cry:

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:18 pm
by rolandson
Wurble wrote:
ErikO wrote: In a war between douchebags and asshats, the bystanders are the only ones that loose.
LOSE. LOSE.

GAAAAAAH!
There's nothing "loose" about the bystanders damnit! :cry:
depends upon the type of asshat or douche that the bystander happened to fall victim to....some of that can leave the recipient quite loose...

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:26 pm
by punkinlobber
As a statistical bystander, I regret douche bags and ass hats. I long for the days when folks in white cowboy hats knew how to walk the line. Now, nobody wears a hat and the line is a crude smear.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:29 pm
by ErikO
I blame my iPhone for the loose bystanders. :angel:

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:04 am
by Cabrito
My guts get loose every time I think about Issa.