I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

1
I no longer wish to be associated with right wing political action committees who no longer care about Second Amendment rights. Fox News reported the the NRA is backing the contemp vote for Holder.
I charge both GOA and the NRA with funding the Fast and Furious witch hunt without ever bringing up Operation Wide Reciever and never questioning former AG Mulkasy.
"Shaka, when the walls fell. Timba, his eyes wide open. Darmok and Jilad at Tenagra."

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

3
GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

4
hagagaga wrote:GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.
Yes. That's the reason given. Do you actually believe that's the motivation for going after Holder?

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

5
Fukshot wrote:
hagagaga wrote:GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.
Yes. That's the reason given. Do you actually believe that's the motivation for going after Holder?
For a significant portion, I'm sure it is.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

6
Fukshot wrote:
hagagaga wrote:GOA is a radical tenther organization that I would never support.

Fact is, Fast and Furious actually has one key difference from operations like Wide Receiver that makes it not only illegal, but an act of war. Previous operations were done with cooperation of Mexican law enforcement. Fast and Furious was done without the knowledge of the Mexican government. Arming an insurgent group without the government's consent is an act of war.
Yes. That's the reason given. Do you actually believe that's the motivation for going after Holder?
Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.
Image

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

8
Fukshot wrote:
KVoimakas wrote:Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.
Wasn't arguing that point. I don't like him one bit.

Not sure where I am on the balance between the evil that is Holder and the evil that is letting the douchebags in congress score points on this shit.
In a war between douchebags and asshats, the bystanders are the only ones that loose.
In a bacon, egg and cheese sandwich the chicken and cow are involved while the pig is committed.

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

10
ErikO wrote:
Fukshot wrote:
KVoimakas wrote:Absolutely not. But why don't we get rid of him? He's not a hero of our's.
Wasn't arguing that point. I don't like him one bit.

Not sure where I am on the balance between the evil that is Holder and the evil that is letting the douchebags in congress score points on this shit.
In a war between douchebags and asshats, the bystanders are the only ones that loose.
LOSE. LOSE.

GAAAAAAH!

There's nothing "loose" about the bystanders damnit! :cry:

Re: I am not renewing GOA, JPFO, or NRA

11
Wurble wrote:
ErikO wrote: In a war between douchebags and asshats, the bystanders are the only ones that loose.
LOSE. LOSE.

GAAAAAAH!
There's nothing "loose" about the bystanders damnit! :cry:
depends upon the type of asshat or douche that the bystander happened to fall victim to....some of that can leave the recipient quite loose...
People want leadership, and in the absence of genuine leadership they'll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone.”Aaron Sorkin/Michael J Fox The American President
Subliterate Buffooery of the right...
Literate Ignorance of the left...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests