Page 2 of 2

Re: Our friend in the White House

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:28 am
by troutkiller
ErikO wrote:Which boardroom is that?
Any one of them apparently.

America, where corporations are people and the sheeple are afraid.

Re: Our friend in the White House

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:43 pm
by RJHinPDX
Vote Obamney 2012

Hope you don't mind, but I'm stealing this.

Re: Our friend in the White House

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:47 pm
by gendoikari87
RJHinPDX wrote:Vote Obamney 2012

Hope you don't mind, but I'm stealing this.
How come no ones used the obvious Robama 2012 or my personal favorite, Robamney

Re: Our friend in the White House

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:18 pm
by Progurt
Because Obamney has a nice ring to it and it's easier to say. Go ahead and steal it RJ, I got it off facebook.

Re: Our friend in the White House

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:01 pm
by JayFromPA
gendoikari87 wrote: Honestly if we as a people truly believe we are heading unchangeably for a major downfall, is it not better to get there quicker, so we can get that part over with and maybe MAYBE start to rebuild before our children come of age, than to put them through the downfall and put the burden of the clean up on them? I mean if we truly believe that's where we are headed regardless of what we do. It's a different story though, if you think there is something we can do about it.
Additionally, less time spent dithering before the actual downfall means less time for decay to settle further into the infrastructure, like the 30ish% of our water pipes that are ticking away ready to rupture. Better to get to the rebuild before water spouts from the streets than after.

Re: Our friend in the White House

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:05 pm
by Progurt
JayFromPA wrote:
gendoikari87 wrote: Honestly if we as a people truly believe we are heading unchangeably for a major downfall, is it not better to get there quicker, so we can get that part over with and maybe MAYBE start to rebuild before our children come of age, than to put them through the downfall and put the burden of the clean up on them? I mean if we truly believe that's where we are headed regardless of what we do. It's a different story though, if you think there is something we can do about it.
Additionally, less time spent dithering before the actual downfall means less time for decay to settle further into the infrastructure, like the 30ish% of our water pipes that are ticking away ready to rupture. Better to get to the rebuild before water spouts from the streets than after.
Good point.