The Liberal Gun Club Forum

I listened to one of the commentator arguments on TV the other day. They went into some of the details of how Romney, working for Bain Capital, would engineer the demise of corporations during leveraged buy outs and then end up making lots of money for his employers when the company died. Now, since the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are people, this makes Romney guilty of murder in the first. No wonder he does not want to talk about Bain Capital in his campaign.

Gnigma wrote:I listened to one of the commentator arguments on TV the other day. They went into some of the details of how Romney, working for Bain Capital, would engineer the demise of corporations during leveraged buy outs and then end up making lots of money for his employers when the company died. Now, since the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are people, this makes Romney guilty of murder in the first. No wonder he does not want to talk about Bain Capital in his campaign.

technically wouldn't that make Bain, not romney, the murderer, since he was working on behalf, or in otherwords part of bain? So what do we do to corporate people when they break the law, how many years in jail do they get?

I fully expect Obama to pick up the term vulture capitalist, a term used by the Rick Perry campaign against Romney.

According to the pundits, he engineered his own killings, so he is the murderer, and his backers at Bain would be accessories.

No federal charge of 'murder' on the books, yet another reason why Holder can ignore Romney.

Mitt Romney is a murderer?

And Barack Obama, king of the drone strikes, is not?

troutkiller wrote:Mitt Romney is a murderer?

And Barack Obama, king of the drone strikes, is not?

Ouch.

Mitt Romney is a murderer?
And Hitler is not?

Mitt Romney a murderer??,thats up for debate I suppose but I am pretty sure he is a lying,cheating,conniving,back stabbing two faced asshole from hell

Vodkin wrote:Mitt Romney a murderer??,thats up for debate I suppose but I am pretty sure he is a lying,cheating,conniving,back stabbing two faced asshole from hell

I don't know about lying, he's a fairly honest politician in comparison, granted everything he says is pretty despicable, but he's more honest than most other politicians out there, including Obama. But telling the truth is what you get to do when you pander to the stupid, the psychopathic and the just plain evil.

If you're definition of telling the truth is changing positions whichever way the wind blows, then I guess he's truthful. In all actuality, the man is a flat pos liar, to say otherwise is ridiculous.

Superimpose Mitt's face on Gordon Gecko (movie - Wall Street) when he tells his audience, "Greed is Good". There are so many avenues the Obama campaign can take with the Romney - Bain Capital connection, I hope they don't wimp out.

Vodkin wrote:Mitt Romney a murderer??,thats up for debate I suppose but I am pretty sure he is a lying,cheating,conniving,back stabbing two faced asshole from hell

Hell? I thought he was from Utah....

troutkiller wrote:

Vodkin wrote:Mitt Romney a murderer??,thats up for debate I suppose but I am pretty sure he is a lying,cheating,conniving,back stabbing two faced asshole from hell

Hell? I thought he was from Utah....

I've lived there, it counts.

Meh, at least Obama's drone strikes were done in the context of an armed conflict. (I know it's not a real war, but try to explain that little tidbit to the Rangers and Marines in Afghanistan.) And, yeah, those drones kill civilians--- terrorists, by definition, are civilians. I'm not apologizing for Obama--- he's way the hell too willing to work with the regressives for me. I'm just thinking that the SCOTUS deciding that corporations are people could be the pinhole in the dam leading to charges against Wall Street and big corporations in general. In general, big corporations kill off small corporations. They are either "people" or not, but apparently legally, they're people. Let's hear some charges!

Gnigma wrote:Meh, at least Obama's drone strikes were done in the context of an armed conflict.

The drone strikes are of very dubious legality in the world's eyes:

http://www.google.com/search?q=drone+st ... 90&bih=584

troutkiller wrote:

Gnigma wrote:Meh, at least Obama's drone strikes were done in the context of an armed conflict.

The drone strikes are of very dubious legality in the world's eyes:

http://www.google.com/search?q=drone+st ... 90&bih=584

The sad truth is illegality in the eyes of the rest of the world has never seemed to change the things the US government does abroad. Our government has that in common with the Nazis and other oppressive regimes.

troutkiller wrote:

Gnigma wrote:Meh, at least Obama's drone strikes were done in the context of an armed conflict.

The drone strikes are of very dubious legality in the world's eyes:

http://www.google.com/search?q=drone+st ... 90&bih=584

They also don't work for reducing or fighting terrorism, but I suspect my drum on this topic has been quite sufficiently beaten.