Re: IL law enjoined

151
Fingers crossed that this gets resolved permanently - I want my Big Boy Toyz back in State and a few more standard cap magazines for my Berettas and HK pistols. It's already been settled in Bruen, Heller and others. It's unconstitutional what they are doing and they know it. I'm afraid that even if SCOTUS rules and strikes it (it'll be years yet) they'll just ramrod another similar law thru in days and we'll be doing this for decades. There needs to be penalties and repercussions against people who ignore SCOTUS rulings and precedent.

VooDoo
Tyrants disarm the people they intend to oppress. Hope is not a Plan.

Dot 'em if ya got 'em!

Re: IL law enjoined

152
VodoundaVinci wrote: Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:39 am Fingers crossed that this gets resolved permanently - I want my Big Boy Toyz back in State and a few more standard cap magazines for my Berettas and HK pistols. It's already been settled in Bruen, Heller and others. It's unconstitutional what they are doing and they know it. I'm afraid that even if SCOTUS rules and strikes it (it'll be years yet) they'll just ramrod another similar law thru in days and we'll be doing this for decades. There needs to be penalties and repercussions against people who ignore SCOTUS rulings and precedent.

VooDoo
Agree, unfortunately. CA's Miller case (filed in 2019) about our AWB and Duncan case (filed 2017) about standard magazines have been going on for years. Both have won at the District court twice and been overturned by CA9 once. Duncan went all the way to SCOTUS and was GVRd. Both now languish at CA9.

SCOTUS taking the Snope case is about our only hope of resolution.

Re: IL law enjoined

153
VodoundaVinci wrote: Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:39 am Fingers crossed that this gets resolved permanently - I want my Big Boy Toyz back in State and a few more standard cap magazines for my Berettas and HK pistols. It's already been settled in Bruen, Heller and others. It's unconstitutional what they are doing and they know it. I'm afraid that even if SCOTUS rules and strikes it (it'll be years yet) they'll just ramrod another similar law thru in days and we'll be doing this for decades. There needs to be penalties and repercussions against people who ignore SCOTUS rulings and precedent.

VooDoo
Some years ago, Florida enacted a law holding lawmakers personally liable for un-Constitutional laws. Quite a few un-Constitutional laws got repealed in several Florida localities, and in a hurry, as I recall. Perhaps it's time for a Federal version of that, holding all state and local government lawmakers likewise personally liable.
"SF Liberal With A Gun + Free Software Advocate"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/
Image

Re: IL law enjoined

155
U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn, who sits on the federal court in East Saint Louis, wrote in his 168-page opinion that the statewide ban on assault-style weapons violates the Second Amendment.

The Protect Illinois Communities Act bans the sale of assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines, and requires existing owners of those weapons to register them with Illinois State Police.

The legislation, signed into law in January 2023, banned dozens of specific brands or types of rifles and handguns, .50-caliber guns, attachments and rapid-firing devices. No rifle will be allowed to accommodate more than 10 rounds, with a 15-round limit for handguns.

As part of his ruling that the assault weapons ban is unconstitutional, McGlynn issued a permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of the ban, but he stayed that injunction for 30 days to give the state time to file an appeal.
https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/il ... itutional/

CDF
Shine your shoes, light your fuse. Can you use them ol' U.S. Blues?
I'll drink your health, share your wealth, run your life, steal your wife.

Re: IL law enjoined

156
General feeling in Illinois is that the State will prevail....on appeal, the 7th Circuit will most certainly overturn McGlynn's ruling. The ban has been in effect for nearly a year and will likely remain so until SCOTUS specifically shoots it down. General feeling is that when/if they do it will be ignored by Illinois or another bill/act with slightly altered wording will be ramrodded forward in days foring the same scenario where The Peoples only recourse is to sue and it'll take another few years to run the course. In the meantime we'll be lucky if we get a few days/weeks between rulings where we can exercise our rights.

No more votes from me for Democrats. Ever.

VooDoo
Tyrants disarm the people they intend to oppress. Hope is not a Plan.

Dot 'em if ya got 'em!

Re: IL law enjoined

157
I agree that the 7th Circuit will probably overturn the district court ruling, so GOA and the other groups should consider requesting an en banc hearing from the 7th Circuit which will probably be refused. Then it's time to petition for cert at SCOTUS. Barnett vs Raoul has been at SCOTUS once before and was granted cert.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: IL law enjoined

158
Meanwhile, months/years are/will be ticking past. A right delayed is a right denied. Illinois has us residents who own firearms by the short hairs. I don't personally believe that I'll be legally able to bring my firearms on the banned list back into the State without registering them. Not sure how many years to wait before I either sell them (out of State) or register. Registration is a prelude to confiscation I believe and admission of guilt the way Illinois is doing it.

I'm screwed.

VooDoo
Tyrants disarm the people they intend to oppress. Hope is not a Plan.

Dot 'em if ya got 'em!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests