"Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

1
Striking workers in California, including writers and actors still picketing Hollywood studios, would be eligible for unemployment benefits under legislation state lawmakers passed on Thursday. Gov. Gavin Newsom now faces a critical decision on whether to sign the bill into law and help provide financial relief to striking entertainment workers and other union members walking out during an era of rising tensions between labor and employers in California.

Under Senate Bill 799, California would become one of the few states that allow striking workers to collect unemployment benefits, joining New York and New Jersey. The bill, as strongly supported by labors unions as it was opposed by the California Chamber of Commerce, would allow striking workers to collect unemployment benefits after being on strike for two weeks. If the governor signs the bill, it would take effect in January.

Newsom has been taking a backstage role as the Hollywood strikes drag on for more than 100 days, emphasizing he’s working with both sides. At an event hosted by Politico on Tuesday, the governor expressed concerns about the unemployment insurance fund’s debt but didn’t say whether he would veto the bill. California’s unemployment fund is more than $18 billion in debt after it borrowed money from the federal government to pay for unemployment benefits. “I think one has to be cautious about that before you enter the conversation about expanding its utilization,” Newsom said.

Democrats, on the other hand, have been voicing their support for the unions. “We want people to be able to pay their rent and want people to be able to put food on their table during a strike or not during the strike. It’s the right thing to do,” said Sen. Anthony Portantino (D-Burbank), who wrote the bill, on the Senate floor. In California, unemployment pay is $450 per week for a maximum of 26 weeks. To be eligible for unemployment, Californians have to meet other requirements such as conducting a reasonable effort to search for work.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/ ... employment

If it passed with an "urgency clause", it would have taken effect immediately after Newsom signed it and Hollywood writers and actors could have applied immediately. Sen Portantino is the author of SB 2, the new concealed carry bill.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

3
Newscum has a big problem, though. The Hollywood top bosses control a whole lot of the media and have boatloads of cash for campaign contributions. If he signs it (overt support) or lets it pass without his signature (tacit support), those Hollywood decision-makers likely will quietly withdraw their support for him come campaign time. It's like with Feinstein and Pelosi; they claim to support "the little guy" until their Hollywood puppetmasters tell them not to. So, basically, he's caught between a rock (the Democrat-supporting unions and their allies) and a hard place (the Hollywood bosses who control the money).

In the end, I suspect he'll try to straddle the fence and let it pass without his signature. Remember that he still wants to run for President. But Hollywood bosses aren't stupid, and they'll consider tacit support just as damning in their eyes as overt support.

It might actually be kinda entertaining watching that scumbag squirm a bit. Popcorn, anyone? :-)
"SF Liberal With A Gun + Free Software Advocate"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/
Image

Re: "Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

4
You're right CT, usually the first stop for Democratic presidential candidates is a visit to LA and getting wined and dined by the Hollywood moguls and leaving with chests of cash and then they travel north to San Francisco for the SF and Silicon Valley money. This campaign season Dems will probably avoid NYC since residents are protesting the migrant overload and even AOC is getting heckled.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

5
California Governor Gavin Newsom on Saturday vetoed a bill that would have paid unemployment benefits to striking workers, and had drawn strong support from labor unions and from his fellow Democrats in the state legislature. In rejecting the bill, Newsom noted that the state's unemployment trust fund is already nearing $20 billion in debt. "Now is not the time to increase costs or incur this sizable debt," he wrote in a message explaining his veto.

The Democratic-majority legislature passed the bill in September amid several high-profile strikes. Hollywood writers ended their nearly five-month walkout 12 days later but Hollywood actors remain out on the picket lines. Southern California hotel workers are also on strike. The bill would have made workers out on strike for at least two weeks eligible for unemployment checks. The vast majority of states, with the exception of New York and New Jersey, do not offer unemployment benefits to striking workers.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/califo ... 023-10-01/
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

6
Well, there it is. The anti worker thought is that workers will want more to strike if they get unemployment. Not that without unemployment their families will go hungry.

My teacher's union has a no strike clause, a deal cut thirty years ago when we unionized at that school. So Gavin has unions in CA by the balls. If corporations offer a no strike clause as a condition, we gotchyer indentured servitude with corporate pay structures. WCGW?

Neoliberals are not our friends. Tough choice between neoliberals and red hats. I belive I'll have a beer.

Maybe we should replace governors with AI? Just asking the question.

CDFingers
The wolf came in; I got my cards; we sat down for a game.
I cut my deck to the Queen of spades, but the cards were all the same.

Re: "Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

7
I updated the thread because I had similar thoughts CDF. California's annual budget is over $310 billion and our unemployment program teeters on insolvency? One party government that is beholden to special interests.
Last edited by highdesert on Sun Oct 01, 2023 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: "Newsom in the hot seat after California passes bill to give striking workers unemployment benefits"

10
sikacz wrote: Sun Oct 01, 2023 11:40 am Drinking is going to be a popular option with me.
Drinking will get you through times of no moral government better than a moral government will get you through times of no drinking. We made booze illegal, then wised up. He he.

CDFingers
The wolf came in; I got my cards; we sat down for a game.
I cut my deck to the Queen of spades, but the cards were all the same.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 31 guests