Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
2May “may issue” go away. Here’s hoping.
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
3Indeed.
"Maybe" we'll let you vote.
Two sides of the same coin.
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
4True. It does seem like some republicans are pushing for “may vote”.NegativeApproach wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 2:20 amIndeed.
"Maybe" we'll let you vote.
Two sides of the same coin.
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
5sbɐɯ ʎʇıɔɐdɐɔ pɹɐpuɐʇs ɟo ןןnɟ ǝɟɐs
ɯɯ6 bdd ɹǝɥʇןɐʍ
13ʞ
"ǝuıqɹɐɔ 1ɐ4ɯ" dɯɐʇsןןoɹ --- ɯoɔos0269ǝן ʇןoɔ
"ǝuıqɹɐɔ ʇuǝɯǝɔɹoɟuǝ ʍɐן sʇןoɔ" dɯɐʇsןןoɹ --- 0269ǝן ʇןoɔ
(béɟ) 59-pɯɐ
ɯɯ6 bdd ɹǝɥʇןɐʍ
13ʞ
"ǝuıqɹɐɔ 1ɐ4ɯ" dɯɐʇsןןoɹ --- ɯoɔos0269ǝן ʇןoɔ
"ǝuıqɹɐɔ ʇuǝɯǝɔɹoɟuǝ ʍɐן sʇןoɔ" dɯɐʇsןןoɹ --- 0269ǝן ʇןoɔ
(béɟ) 59-pɯɐ
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
6Do we want to trade a woman's right to choose for the right to carry a gun?
Case decided in the fall.
CDFingers
Case decided in the fall.
CDFingers
Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eyed Jack
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eyed Jack
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
7If each state can’t arbitrarily restrict the right to bear arms, it can’t arbitrarily restrict the right of a woman to conduct medical procedures on her own body.
Glad that federal government is boring again.
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
8You expect logic, consistency, fairness, and "Stare Decisis" from the Six?????????Stiff wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 8:05 am If each state can’t arbitrarily restrict the right to bear arms, it can’t arbitrarily restrict the right of a woman to conduct medical procedures on her own body.
"States' Rights" has always been inconsistently applied, always in favor of the WORST policies--like slavery--and violated in favor of the WORST policies--the Fugitive Slave Act.
"Even if the bee could explain to the fly why pollen is better than shit, the fly could never understand."
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
9The two issues are not a trade. Neither restriction is acceptable.CDFingers wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 7:23 am Do we want to trade a woman's right to choose for the right to carry a gun?
Case decided in the fall.
CDFingers
Re: SCOTUS to determine if
11DispositionMatrix wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 5:24 am Original NYSRPA v. Corlett thread:
Right to Carry petition to SCOTUS
Yes, the original thread and now three threads.
This will be argued someplace during the SCOTUS 2021-2022 Term and the opinion could end up being released at the end of June 2022.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
12Thanks sikacz for a twaddle-free answer.
I: ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED
II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY
III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET
IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET AND WHAT'S BEHIND IT
II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY
III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET
IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET AND WHAT'S BEHIND IT
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
13Crazy cat peekin' through a lace bandana
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eyed Jack
like a one-eyed Cheshire, like a diamond-eyed Jack
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
14A court that acts on political party ideology and not equality inherent in rights under the law should be feared.
Re: SCOTUS to determine if "may issue" states violate the 2A.
15As do all of us. But I'll take what I can get out of it since loses elsewhere are almost a certainty.