SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post your links to the latest news.

Moderators: admin, Inquisitor, ForumModerator, WebsiteContent

Post Reply
User avatar
DispositionMatrix
Carpal Tunnel
Posts: 11808
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:12 pm
Location: SoNH
Contact:

SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by DispositionMatrix »

Court won’t revive suit against gun site over spa shooting
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won’t revive a lawsuit against a firearms website over a suburban Milwaukee spa shooting.

The justices rejected an appeal Monday from the daughter of one of three people shot to death by a man who illegally bought a semi-automatic pistol and ammunition from someone he met through Armslist.com.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed the suit, ruling that federal law protects website operators from liability for posting content from a third party. The state court rejected arguments that websites that enable gun deals must take reasonable care to prevent sales to people prohibited from purchasing firearms. The Wisconsin shooter was under a court order that prohibited him from possessing guns.

User avatar
DispositionMatrix
Carpal Tunnel
Posts: 11808
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:12 pm
Location: SoNH
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by DispositionMatrix »

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/tech-and- ... urt Review
The daughter of a mass shooting victim lost her bid to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court that Armslist LLC should be held liable for selling the killer a gun online.

The justices Nov. 25 denied a petition by Yasmeen Daniel to review a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that a federal online publisher law prohibited her from suing the firearms website.

The high court turned down the chance to review the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which grants websites broad immunity from liability for user-posted content. Several bills are pending in Congress to change the decades-old law as part of a wide-ranging look into how big tech companies police content on their platforms.

User avatar
K9s
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 11302
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:18 pm
Location: LGC Member: Georgia
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by K9s »

So, we are still waiting on the NY decision, it seems.
The border between civilization and savagery is porous and patrolled by opportunists. Resist fascism. Vote like your democracy depends on it.

User avatar
YankeeTarheel
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 12573
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:01 pm
Location: The Jughandle State
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by YankeeTarheel »

K9s wrote:
Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:30 pm
So, we are still waiting on the NY decision, it seems.
And the NJ one, too.
""If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." -- LBJ

User avatar
highdesert
Carpal Tunnel
Posts: 18080
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:54 pm
Location: Biggest state on the Left Coast
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by highdesert »

It looks like mixed messages from SCOTUS to the public on firearms cases, but each case is different. Just because SCOTUS allowed the CT lawsuit against Remington to proceed doesn't mean plaintiffs will eventually win.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

User avatar
awshoot
Been around awhile
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:40 am
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by awshoot »

highdesert wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 9:57 am
It looks like mixed messages from SCOTUS to the public on firearms cases, but each case is different. Just because SCOTUS allowed the CT lawsuit against Remington to proceed doesn't mean plaintiffs will eventually win.
It seems to me that whether the plaintiffs prevail or suffer defeat, they won. Their goal is to cripple the industry via the exorbitant cost of mounting a legal defense. Prevailing in the actual lawsuit would just be icing.

User avatar
K9s
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 11302
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:18 pm
Location: LGC Member: Georgia
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by K9s »

awshoot wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 8:34 pm
highdesert wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 9:57 am
It looks like mixed messages from SCOTUS to the public on firearms cases, but each case is different. Just because SCOTUS allowed the CT lawsuit against Remington to proceed doesn't mean plaintiffs will eventually win.
It seems to me that whether the plaintiffs prevail or suffer defeat, they won. Their goal is to cripple the industry via the exorbitant cost of mounting a legal defense. Prevailing in the actual lawsuit would just be icing.
Like almost every other industry, the oligarchs will survive and thrive. The upstarts will be purchased or squashed.
The border between civilization and savagery is porous and patrolled by opportunists. Resist fascism. Vote like your democracy depends on it.

User avatar
DispositionMatrix
Carpal Tunnel
Posts: 11808
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:12 pm
Location: SoNH
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by DispositionMatrix »


User avatar
BKinzey
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 2184
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:34 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by BKinzey »

DispositionMatrix wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 8:24 pm
Brady is suing Armslist again.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/docume ... -et-al.pdf
Glancing through the PDF it seems this is their case:
16. Jones, in 2017, purchased a Glock 26 9mm handgun (“the Handgun”) from
Caldwell through his Armslist.com “store.” Jones foreseeably resold the Handgun into the broader
criminal market, where it ultimately was obtained by Shomari Legghette, a Prohibited Purchaser
unable to buy guns in the legal firearms market due to past felony convictions. Legghette
foreseeably used the Handgun to murder Commander Bauer on February 13, 2018.
And Armslist is a place for legal commerce that we don't like.

User avatar
lurker
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 16233
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: spencer, nc.
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by lurker »

BKinzey wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:31 pm
Jones foreseeably resold
Legghette foreseeably used

User avatar
K9s
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 11302
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:18 pm
Location: LGC Member: Georgia
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by K9s »

Next stop, banning gun stores and liquor stores?
The border between civilization and savagery is porous and patrolled by opportunists. Resist fascism. Vote like your democracy depends on it.

User avatar
DispositionMatrix
Carpal Tunnel
Posts: 11808
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:12 pm
Location: SoNH
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by DispositionMatrix »

K9s wrote:Next stop, banning gun stores and liquor stores?
Various municipalities already are trying to get rid of firearm dealers.
sbɐɯ ʎʇıɔɐdɐɔ pɹɐpuɐʇs ɟo ןןnɟ ǝɟɐs
ɯɯ6 bdd ɹǝɥʇןɐʍ
13ʞ
"ǝuıqɹɐɔ 1ɐ4ɯ" dɯɐʇsןןoɹ --- ɯoɔos0269ǝן ʇןoɔ
"ǝuıqɹɐɔ ʇuǝɯǝɔɹoɟuǝ ʍɐן sʇןoɔ" dɯɐʇsןןoɹ --- 0269ǝן ʇןoɔ
(béɟ) 59-pɯɐ

User avatar
JohnNewell
Grizzled Veteran
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 11:15 pm
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by JohnNewell »

K9s wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 12:48 am
Next stop, banning gun stores and liquor stores?
In Wisconsin you can have a gun store in a bar. I dunno how common that is, but I've been in one.

Can't do that in Texas any more. One of our local liquor stores is called Guns and Liquor but the truth of the matter is that the owner died, the family stopped the gun business, and the state changed the laws. So now they just sell the T-shirts.

User avatar
K9s
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 11302
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:18 pm
Location: LGC Member: Georgia
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by K9s »

I think there are more laws against booze than guns here in Georgia.
The border between civilization and savagery is porous and patrolled by opportunists. Resist fascism. Vote like your democracy depends on it.

User avatar
BillMcD
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:12 pm
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS rejects appeal in Wisconsin case against Armslist

Post by BillMcD »

lurker wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 11:24 pm
BKinzey wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:31 pm
Jones foreseeably resold
Legghette foreseeably used
Yeah those are leading statements that require hard proof. Fault lies with the straw purchaser, Jones, who won't be buying guns for anyone now. Unless they plan on banning online liquor sales and pharmacies as well, i don't see an online gun store going poof unless they somehow they get shut down by spurious lawsuits against public participation.

Oh that would be a fun way for anti-gunners to go out, get struck down for anti-SLAPP law violations.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NegativeApproach and 0 guests