Page 1 of 1

Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2022 4:22 pm
by DispositionMatrix

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2022 5:07 pm
by sikacz
Another elitist authoritarian. Surprised not.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 8:36 am
by F4FEver
Don't see the point of banning any 'tool', but the rest...I have no problem with those. Access is the problem. Many, many deranged, violent, wackos 'out there' who have legally bought guns. Can't buy a gun in Colorado? Go to the gun show in Wyoming, bring cash, bring home a gun...

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:06 am
by highdesert
Sounds very Trumpian, the laws aren't meant for her.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:31 pm
by sikacz
highdesert wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:06 am Sounds very Trumpian, the laws aren't meant for her.
There are authoritarians on the left, right and probably in the center. Their key commonality is nothing applies to them and the special few that are superior to the rest of us.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:39 pm
by tonguengroover
Well in the link of her doing the training I didn't see one of them awful assault guns. I bet she owns one or three. But good for her doing training.
Also wants bipartisan solutions. Ha.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:17 pm
by sikacz
I want someone who is not a hypocrite. One of us would be fine.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 12:05 am
by YankeeTarheel
She's of the Krysten Sinema "School" of fake Democrats, ie, useless DINOs.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 11:17 am
by highdesert
sikacz wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:31 pm
highdesert wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:06 am Sounds very Trumpian, the laws aren't meant for her.
There are authoritarians on the left, right and probably in the center. Their key commonality is nothing applies to them and the special few that are superior to the rest of us.
Yup

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 11:55 am
by featureless
highdesert wrote: Thu Oct 06, 2022 11:17 am
sikacz wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:31 pm
highdesert wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:06 am Sounds very Trumpian, the laws aren't meant for her.
There are authoritarians on the left, right and probably in the center. Their key commonality is nothing applies to them and the special few that are superior to the rest of us.
Yup
Do you guys mean like how Newsom didn't follow the Covid mandates the rest of us did?

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 12:20 pm
by highdesert
featureless wrote: Thu Oct 06, 2022 11:55 am
highdesert wrote: Thu Oct 06, 2022 11:17 am
sikacz wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:31 pm
highdesert wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:06 am Sounds very Trumpian, the laws aren't meant for her.
There are authoritarians on the left, right and probably in the center. Their key commonality is nothing applies to them and the special few that are superior to the rest of us.
Yup
Do you guys mean like how Newsom didn't follow the Covid mandates the rest of us did?

Exactly featureless ! Like Newsom's attendance unmasked at the famous birthday party at the French Laundry Restaurant in Napa during the height of COVID. While Newsom was the chief enforcer of California's COVID regulations, which included a mask mandate.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:02 pm
by wooglin
Last I checked evil black guns were still legal.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 4:30 pm
by sikacz
Not for lack of trying….

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:10 am
by highdesert
Former congresswoman and 2020 presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has announced she is leaving the Democratic party.

"I can no longer remain in today's Democratic party," she said on an episode of her podcast. "It's now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers, driven by cowardly wokeness..."

Gabbard additionally accused the party of "stoking anti-white racism," being contemptuous toward religion and police and driving the country closer to nuclear war.
https://www.npr.org/2022/10/12/11283075 ... atic-party

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 8:21 am
by Wino
I never understood why she claimed to be a dem in the first place. Her leaving party is like me boycotting Chik-Fil-A - a business I've NEVER bought from, been in or intend to, ever - you can't leave or boycott something you've never been or done. Unless you're just an attention whore like daddy turd.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 9:02 am
by DispositionMatrix

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 12:31 pm
by tonguengroover
She's not getting enough attention and money so she's butt hurt. Is she going repug or independent?

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 12:43 pm
by Wino
Was that a rhetorical question ??? Cause I don't believe anyone gives a flying fuck what she does.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 1:54 pm
by tonguengroover
Wino wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 12:43 pm Was that a rhetorical question ??? Cause I don't believe anyone gives a flying fuck what she does.
Well I would like to know if she's going repug traitor so no.

Re: Bans supported by Tulsi Gabbard were not meant for her, apparently

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 7:59 am
by INVICTVS138
She’s a bought and paid for Russian troll…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk