Very interesting. I have several hundred rounds of Interceptors, and was not aware they were considered particularly 'hot' loads. (I also note that the posts in the link are about 10 years old.) The Taurus 942 was no happier with the Interceptors than with anything else, though I haven't been to the range in a couple of months.
I will now likely avoid the Interceptors in my Mark II, because it's having feeding problems anyway-- I suspect the magazine (one is better than the other, but even the one that feeds is pretty unreliable).
What I'm most interested in is Federal Punch, which narrows the gap between .22 LR and most 'normal' .22 WMR from a two-inch barrel, but also because the manufacturing may be better, and I'm hoping to get fewer light strikes from the Taurus. If I ever find any, I'll probably use it for the Taurus and the Rough Rider, and only rarely in the Ruger. I had no failures to fire from the Interceptors in the Mark II, but I didn't shoot a lot of 'em.
Might be time to buy a Ruger Mark IV during the short window when we in CA can purchase non-microstamped handguns.
https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/handgun/mark-iv-40183
https://www.turners.com/ruger/ruger-mk- ... ck-1876017
I'm not pushing Turners, just showing they're for sale in CA.Statistics: Posted by highdesert — Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:24 am
]]>